你可以尝试这样做。我相信还有重构的空间。我无法使用分裂函数。也许有人知道不分裂的方法。

代码设置，可以把它放在你的。js库

使用它的代码(有客户端代码，只是因为它在浏览器中测试过):

var sentence = "My Stack is Overflowing."
document.write(sentence.reverseLetters() + '<br />');
document.write(sentence.reverseWords() + '<br />');

代码片段:

String.prototype.aggregate = function(vals, aggregateFunction) { var temp = ''; for (var i = vals.length - 1; i >= 0; i--) { temp = aggregateFunction(vals[i], temp); } return temp; } String.prototype.reverseLetters = function() { return this.aggregate(this.split(''), function(current, word) { return word + current; }) } String.prototype.reverseWords = function() { return this.aggregate(this.split(' '), function(current, word) { return word + ' ' + current; }) } var sentence = "My Stack is Overflowing." document.write(sentence.reverseLetters() + '<br />'); document.write(sentence.reverseWords() + '<br />');

保持干燥和简单，傻!!

function reverse(s){
let str = s;
var reverse = '';
for (var i=str.length;i>0;i--){

    var newstr = str.substring(0,i)
    reverse += newstr.substr(-1,1)
}
return reverse;
}

var str = "my name is saurabh ";
var empStr='',finalString='';
var chunk=[];
function reverse(str){
var i,j=0,n=str.length;
    for(i=0;i<n;++i){
        if(str[i]===' '){
            chunk[j]=empStr;
            empStr = '';
            j++;
        }else{
            empStr=empStr+str[i];
        }
    }
    for(var z=chunk.length-1;z>=0;z--){
        finalString = finalString +' '+ chunk[z];
        console.log(finalString);
    }
    return true;
}
reverse(str);

在ES6中，你还有一个选择

function reverseString (str) {
  return [...str].reverse().join('')
}

reverseString('Hello');

字符串本身是不可变的，但是你可以用下面的代码轻松地创建一个反向副本:

function reverseString(str) {

  var strArray = str.split("");
  strArray.reverse();

  var strReverse = strArray.join("");

  return strReverse;
}

reverseString("hello");

真正的答案是:你不能把它颠倒过来，但是你可以创建一个颠倒过来的新字符串。

Just as an exercise to play with recursion: sometimes when you go to an interview, the interviewer may ask you how to do this using recursion, and I think the "preferred answer" might be "I would rather not do this in recursion as it can easily cause a stack overflow" (because it is O(n) rather than O(log n). If it is O(log n), it is quite difficult to get a stack overflow -- 4 billion items could be handled by a stack level of 32, as 2 ** 32 is 4294967296. But if it is O(n), then it can easily get a stack overflow.

有时候面试官还是会问你，“作为练习，你为什么不用递归来写呢?”就是这样:

String.prototype.reverse = function() {
    if (this.length <= 1) return this;
    else return this.slice(1).reverse() + this.slice(0,1);
}

测试运行:

var s = "";
for(var i = 0; i < 1000; i++) {
    s += ("apple" + i);
}
console.log(s.reverse());

输出:

999elppa899elppa...2elppa1elppa0elppa

为了尝试获得堆栈溢出，我在谷歌Chrome中将1000更改为10000，它报告:

RangeError: Maximum call stack size exceeded