如果你只深入一层，一个嵌套的理解也可以:

>>> x = [["a","b"], ["c"]]
>>> [inner
...     for outer in x
...         for inner in outer]
['a', 'b', 'c']

在一行上，它变成:

>>> [j for i in x for j in i]
['a', 'b', 'c']

您所描述的就是所谓的将列表扁平化，有了这些新知识，您将能够在谷歌上找到许多解决方案(没有内置的扁平化方法)。以下是其中一个，来自http://www.daniel-lemire.com/blog/archives/2006/05/10/flattening-lists-in-python/:

def flatten(x):
    flat = True
    ans = []
    for i in x:
        if ( i.__class__ is list):
            ans = flatten(i)
        else:
            ans.append(i)
    return ans

对于一级扁平化，如果你关心速度，在我尝试过的所有条件下，这比之前的任何答案都快。(也就是说，如果您需要结果作为列表。如果你只需要在运行中迭代它，那么链的例子可能更好。)它的工作原理是预先分配一个最终大小的列表，并按片复制部分(这是一种比任何迭代器方法都低级别的块复制):

def join(a):
    """Joins a sequence of sequences into a single sequence.  (One-level flattening.)
    E.g., join([(1,2,3), [4, 5], [6, (7, 8, 9), 10]]) = [1,2,3,4,5,6,(7,8,9),10]
    This is very efficient, especially when the subsequences are long.
    """
    n = sum([len(b) for b in a])
    l = [None]*n
    i = 0
    for b in a:
        j = i+len(b)
        l[i:j] = b
        i = j
    return l

带注释的排序时间列表:

[(0.5391559600830078, 'flatten4b'), # join() above. 
(0.5400412082672119, 'flatten4c'), # Same, with sum(len(b) for b in a) 
(0.5419249534606934, 'flatten4a'), # Similar, using zip() 
(0.7351131439208984, 'flatten1b'), # list(itertools.chain.from_iterable(a)) 
(0.7472689151763916, 'flatten1'), # list(itertools.chain(*a)) 
(1.5468521118164062, 'flatten3'), # [i for j in a for i in j] 
(26.696547985076904, 'flatten2')] # sum(a, [])

总是有reduce(不推荐使用functools):

>>> x = [ [ 'a', 'b'], ['c'] ]
>>> for el in reduce(lambda a,b: a+b, x, []):
...  print el
...
__main__:1: DeprecationWarning: reduce() not supported in 3.x; use functools.reduce()
a
b
c
>>> import functools
>>> for el in functools.reduce(lambda a,b: a+b, x, []):
...   print el
...
a
b
c
>>>

不幸的是，用于列表连接的加号操作符不能用作函数——或者幸运的是，如果为了提高可见性，您希望lambdas变得更丑一些。

flat_list = []
map(flat_list.extend, list_of_lists)

最短!

性能比较:

import itertools
import timeit
big_list = [[0]*1000 for i in range(1000)]
timeit.repeat(lambda: list(itertools.chain.from_iterable(big_list)), number=100)
timeit.repeat(lambda: list(itertools.chain(*big_list)), number=100)
timeit.repeat(lambda: (lambda b: map(b.extend, big_list))([]), number=100)
timeit.repeat(lambda: [el for list_ in big_list for el in list_], number=100)
[100*x for x in timeit.repeat(lambda: sum(big_list, []), number=1)]

生产:

>>> import itertools
>>> import timeit
>>> big_list = [[0]*1000 for i in range(1000)]
>>> timeit.repeat(lambda: list(itertools.chain.from_iterable(big_list)), number=100)
[3.016212113769325, 3.0148865239060227, 3.0126415732791028]
>>> timeit.repeat(lambda: list(itertools.chain(*big_list)), number=100)
[3.019953987082083, 3.528754223385439, 3.02181439266457]
>>> timeit.repeat(lambda: (lambda b: map(b.extend, big_list))([]), number=100)
[1.812084445152557, 1.7702404451095965, 1.7722977998725362]
>>> timeit.repeat(lambda: [el for list_ in big_list for el in list_], number=100)
[5.409658160700605, 5.477502077679354, 5.444318360412744]
>>> [100*x for x in timeit.repeat(lambda: sum(big_list, []), number=1)]
[399.27587954973444, 400.9240571138051, 403.7521153804846]

这是在Windows XP 32位的Python 2.7.1上，但上面评论中的@temoto得到from_iterable比map+extend更快，所以它相当依赖于平台和输入。

不要使用sum(big_list， [])