最好的方法取决于您计划如何安排这些组件。下面是我现在想到的几个例子:

<Filters />是<List />的子组件 <Filters />和<List />都是父组件的子组件 <Filters />和<List />完全存在于单独的根组件中。

可能还有其他我没有想到的情况。如果你的不符合这些要求，请告诉我。以下是我处理前两种情况的一些非常粗略的例子:

场景# 1

您可以将处理程序从<List />传递到<Filters />，然后可以在onChange事件上调用该处理程序以使用当前值筛选列表。

JSFiddle for #1 →

/** @jsx React.DOM */

var Filters = React.createClass({
  handleFilterChange: function() {
    var value = this.refs.filterInput.getDOMNode().value;
    this.props.updateFilter(value);
  },
  render: function() {
    return <input type="text" ref="filterInput" onChange={this.handleFilterChange} placeholder="Filter" />;
  }
});

var List = React.createClass({
  getInitialState: function() {
    return {
      listItems: ['Chicago', 'New York', 'Tokyo', 'London', 'San Francisco', 'Amsterdam', 'Hong Kong'],
      nameFilter: ''
    };
  },
  handleFilterUpdate: function(filterValue) {
    this.setState({
      nameFilter: filterValue
    });
  },
  render: function() {
    var displayedItems = this.state.listItems.filter(function(item) {
      var match = item.toLowerCase().indexOf(this.state.nameFilter.toLowerCase());
      return (match !== -1);
    }.bind(this));

    var content;
    if (displayedItems.length > 0) {
      var items = displayedItems.map(function(item) {
        return <li>{item}</li>;
      });
      content = <ul>{items}</ul>
    } else {
      content = <p>No items matching this filter</p>;
    }

    return (
      <div>
        <Filters updateFilter={this.handleFilterUpdate} />
        <h4>Results</h4>
        {content}
      </div>
    );
  }
});

React.renderComponent(<List />, document.body);

场景# 2

与场景#1类似，但是父组件将把处理程序函数传递给<Filters />，并将过滤后的列表传递给< list />。我更喜欢这个方法，因为它将<List />与<Filters />解耦。

JSFiddle for #2 →

/** @jsx React.DOM */

var Filters = React.createClass({
  handleFilterChange: function() {
    var value = this.refs.filterInput.getDOMNode().value;
    this.props.updateFilter(value);
  },
  render: function() {
    return <input type="text" ref="filterInput" onChange={this.handleFilterChange} placeholder="Filter" />;
  }
});

var List = React.createClass({
  render: function() {
    var content;
    if (this.props.items.length > 0) {
      var items = this.props.items.map(function(item) {
        return <li>{item}</li>;
      });
      content = <ul>{items}</ul>
    } else {
      content = <p>No items matching this filter</p>;
    }
    return (
      <div className="results">
        <h4>Results</h4>
        {content}
      </div>
    );
  }
});

var ListContainer = React.createClass({
  getInitialState: function() {
    return {
      listItems: ['Chicago', 'New York', 'Tokyo', 'London', 'San Francisco', 'Amsterdam', 'Hong Kong'],
      nameFilter: ''
    };
  },
  handleFilterUpdate: function(filterValue) {
    this.setState({
      nameFilter: filterValue
    });
  },
  render: function() {
    var displayedItems = this.state.listItems.filter(function(item) {
      var match = item.toLowerCase().indexOf(this.state.nameFilter.toLowerCase());
      return (match !== -1);
    }.bind(this));

    return (
      <div>
        <Filters updateFilter={this.handleFilterUpdate} />
        <List items={displayedItems} />
      </div>
    );
  }
});

React.renderComponent(<ListContainer />, document.body);

场景# 3

当组件不能在任何类型的父子关系之间进行通信时，文档建议设置一个全局事件系统。

我就是这么处理的。 假设你有一个<select>表示月，一个<select>表示日。 天数取决于选择的月份。

这两个列表都属于第三个对象，即左面板。两个<select>也是leftPanel <div>的子元素 这是一个在LeftPanel组件中带有回调和处理程序的游戏。

要测试它，只需将代码复制到两个分开的文件中并运行index.html。然后选择一个月，看看天数的变化情况。

dates.js

    /** @jsx React.DOM */


    var monthsLength = [0,31, 28, 31, 30, 31, 30, 31, 31, 30, 31, 30, 31];
    var MONTHS_ARR = ["Jan","Feb","Mar","Apr","May","Jun","Jul","Aug","Sep","Oct","Nov","Dec"];

    var DayNumber = React.createClass({
        render: function() {
            return (
                <option value={this.props.dayNum}>{this.props.dayNum}</option>
            );
        }
    });

    var DaysList = React.createClass({
        getInitialState: function() {
            return {numOfDays: 30};
        },
        handleMonthUpdate: function(newMonthix) {
            this.state.numOfDays = monthsLength[newMonthix];
            console.log("Setting days to " + monthsLength[newMonthix] + " month = " + newMonthix);

            this.forceUpdate();
        },
        handleDaySelection: function(evt) {
            this.props.dateHandler(evt.target.value);
        },
        componentDidMount: function() {
            this.props.readyCallback(this.handleMonthUpdate)
        },
        render: function() {
            var dayNodes = [];
            for (i = 1; i <= this.state.numOfDays; i++) {
                dayNodes = dayNodes.concat([<DayNumber dayNum={i} />]);
            }
            return (
                <select id={this.props.id} onChange = {this.handleDaySelection}>
                    <option value="" disabled defaultValue>Day</option>
                        {dayNodes}
                </select>
                );
        }
    });

    var Month = React.createClass({
        render: function() {
            return (
                <option value={this.props.monthIx}>{this.props.month}</option>
            );
        }
    });

    var MonthsList = React.createClass({
        handleUpdate: function(evt) {
            console.log("Local handler:" + this.props.id + " VAL= " + evt.target.value);
            this.props.dateHandler(evt.target.value);

            return false;
        },
        render: function() {
            var monthIx = 0;

            var monthNodes = this.props.data.map(function (month) {
                monthIx++;
                return (
                    <Month month={month} monthIx={monthIx} />
                    );
            });

            return (
                <select id = {this.props.id} onChange = {this.handleUpdate}>
                    <option value="" disabled defaultValue>Month</option>
                        {monthNodes}
                </select>
                );
        }
    });

    var LeftPanel = React.createClass({
        dayRefresh: function(newMonth) {
            // Nothing - will be replaced
        },
        daysReady: function(refreshCallback) {
            console.log("Regisering days list");
        this.dayRefresh = refreshCallback;
        },
        handleMonthChange: function(monthIx) {
            console.log("New month");
            this.dayRefresh(monthIx);
        },
        handleDayChange: function(dayIx) {
            console.log("New DAY: " + dayIx);
        },
        render: function() {
            return(
                <div id="orderDetails">
                    <DaysList id="dayPicker" dateHandler={this.handleDayChange} readyCallback = {this.daysReady} />
                    <MonthsList data={MONTHS_ARR} id="monthPicker" dateHandler={this.handleMonthChange}  />
                </div>
            );
        }
    });



    React.renderComponent(
        <LeftPanel />,
        document.getElementById('leftPanel')
    );

以及用于运行左侧面板组件的HTML index . html

<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
    <title>Dates</title>

    <script src="//cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/jquery/2.1.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
    <script src="//cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/underscore.js/1.6.0/underscore-min.js"></script>
    <script src="//fb.me/react-0.11.1.js"></script>
    <script src="//fb.me/JSXTransformer-0.11.1.js"></script>
</head>

    <style>

        #dayPicker {
            position: relative;
            top: 97px;
            left: 20px;
            width: 60px;
            height: 17px;
        }

        #monthPicker {
            position: relative;
            top: 97px;
            left: 22px;
            width: 95px;
            height: 17px;
        }

        select {
            font-size: 11px;
        }

    </style>


    <body>
        <div id="leftPanel">
        </div>

        <script type="text/jsx" src="dates.js"></script>

    </body>
</html>

我曾经是你现在的位置，作为一个初学者，你有时会觉得不适应如何反应的方式来做这件事。我将尝试用我现在思考的方式来解决这个问题。

国家是交流的基石

通常它归结于你改变这个组件的状态的方式在你的例子中你指出三个组件。

<List />:它可能会根据筛选器显示项目列表 <Filters />:筛选将更改数据的选项。 <TopBar />:选项列表。

为了协调所有这些交互你需要一个更高的组件我们叫它App，它会把动作和数据传递给每个组件例如，它看起来是这样的

<div>
  <List items={this.state.filteredItems}/>
  <Filter filter={this.state.filter} setFilter={setFilter}/>
</div>

因此，当setFilter被调用时，它将影响filteredItem并重新渲染两个组件;。如果这不是完全清楚，我给你一个例子，你可以在一个文件中检查复选框:

import React, {Component} from 'react';
import {render} from 'react-dom';

const Person  = ({person, setForDelete}) => (
          <div>
            <input type="checkbox" name="person" checked={person.checked} onChange={setForDelete.bind(this, person)} />
            {person.name}
          </div>
);


class PeopleList extends Component {

  render() {

    return(
      <div>
       {this.props.people.map((person, i) => {
         return <Person key={i} person={person} setForDelete={this.props.setForDelete} />;
       })}
       <div onClick={this.props.deleteRecords}>Delete Selected Records</div>
     </div>
    );
  }

} // end class

class App extends React.Component {

  constructor(props) {
    super(props)
    this.state = {people:[{id:1, name:'Cesar', checked:false},{id:2, name:'Jose', checked:false},{id:3, name:'Marbel', checked:false}]}
  }

  deleteRecords() {
    const people = this.state.people.filter(p => !p.checked);

    this.setState({people});
 }

  setForDelete(person) {
    const checked = !person.checked;
    const people = this.state.people.map((p)=>{
      if(p.id === person.id)
        return {name:person.name, checked};
      return p;
    });

    this.setState({people});
  }

  render () {

    return <PeopleList people={this.state.people} deleteRecords={this.deleteRecords.bind(this)} setForDelete={this.setForDelete.bind(this)}/>;
  }
}

render(<App/>, document.getElementById('app'));

下面的代码帮助我建立两个兄弟姐妹之间的通信。设置是在render()和componentDidMount()调用期间在它们的父节点中完成的。 它基于https://reactjs.org/docs/refs-and-the-dom.html 希望能有所帮助。

class App extends React.Component<IAppProps, IAppState> {
    private _navigationPanel: NavigationPanel;
    private _mapPanel: MapPanel;

    constructor() {
        super();
        this.state = {};
    }

    // `componentDidMount()` is called by ReactJS after `render()`
    componentDidMount() {
        // Pass _mapPanel to _navigationPanel
        // It will allow _navigationPanel to call _mapPanel directly
        this._navigationPanel.setMapPanel(this._mapPanel);
    }

    render() {
        return (
            <div id="appDiv" style={divStyle}>
                // `ref=` helps to get reference to a child during rendering
                <NavigationPanel ref={(child) => { this._navigationPanel = child; }} />
                <MapPanel ref={(child) => { this._mapPanel = child; }} />
            </div>
        );
    }
}

扩展@MichaelLaCroix的回答，当组件不能在任何类型的父子关系之间进行通信时，文档建议设置一个全局事件系统。

在<Filters />和<TopBar />没有任何上述关系的情况下，一个简单的全局发射器可以像这样使用:

componentDidMount -订阅事件

componentWillUnmount -从事件中取消订阅

js和EventSystem代码

EventSystem.js

class EventSystem{

    constructor() {
        this.queue = {};
        this.maxNamespaceSize = 50;
    }

    publish(/** namespace **/ /** arguments **/) {
        if(arguments.length < 1) {
            throw "Invalid namespace to publish";
        }

        var namespace = arguments[0];
        var queue = this.queue[namespace];

        if (typeof queue === 'undefined' || queue.length < 1) {
            console.log('did not find queue for %s', namespace);
            return false;
        }

        var valueArgs = Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments);

        valueArgs.shift(); // remove namespace value from value args

        queue.forEach(function(callback) {
            callback.apply(null, valueArgs);
        });

        return true;
    }

    subscribe(/** namespace **/ /** callback **/) {
        const namespace = arguments[0];
        if(!namespace) throw "Invalid namespace";
        const callback = arguments[arguments.length - 1];
        if(typeof callback !== 'function') throw "Invalid callback method";

        if (typeof this.queue[namespace] === 'undefined') {
            this.queue[namespace] = [];
        }

        const queue = this.queue[namespace];
        if(queue.length === this.maxNamespaceSize) {
            console.warn('Shifting first element in queue: `%s` since it reached max namespace queue count : %d', namespace, this.maxNamespaceSize);
            queue.shift();
        }

        // Check if this callback already exists for this namespace
        for(var i = 0; i < queue.length; i++) {
            if(queue[i] === callback) {
                throw ("The exact same callback exists on this namespace: " + namespace);
            }
        }

        this.queue[namespace].push(callback);

        return [namespace, callback];
    }

    unsubscribe(/** array or topic, method **/) {
        let namespace;
        let callback;
        if(arguments.length === 1) {
            let arg = arguments[0];
            if(!arg || !Array.isArray(arg)) throw "Unsubscribe argument must be an array";
            namespace = arg[0];
            callback = arg[1];
        }
        else if(arguments.length === 2) {
            namespace = arguments[0];
            callback = arguments[1];
        }

        if(!namespace || typeof callback !== 'function') throw "Namespace must exist or callback must be a function";
        const queue = this.queue[namespace];
        if(queue) {
            for(var i = 0; i < queue.length; i++) {
                if(queue[i] === callback) {
                    queue.splice(i, 1); // only unique callbacks can be pushed to same namespace queue
                    return;
                }
            }
        }
    }

    setNamespaceSize(size) {
        if(!this.isNumber(size)) throw "Queue size must be a number";
        this.maxNamespaceSize = size;
        return true;
    }

    isNumber(n) {
        return !isNaN(parseFloat(n)) && isFinite(n);
    }

}

NotificationComponent.js

class NotificationComponent extends React.Component {

    getInitialState() {
        return {
            // optional. see alternative below
            subscriber: null
        };
    }

    errorHandler() {
        const topic = arguments[0];
        const label = arguments[1];
        console.log('Topic %s label %s', topic, label);
    }

    componentDidMount() {
        var subscriber = EventSystem.subscribe('error.http', this.errorHandler);
        this.state.subscriber = subscriber;
    }

    componentWillUnmount() {
        EventSystem.unsubscribe('error.http', this.errorHandler);

        // alternatively
        // EventSystem.unsubscribe(this.state.subscriber);
    }

    render() {

    }
}

好吧，有一些方法可以做到这一点，但我只想专注于使用Redux使用商店，这让你的生活在这些情况下变得更容易，而不是给你一个快速的解决方案，只有在这种情况下，使用纯React最终会在真正的大型应用程序中混乱，组件之间的通信变得越来越难，随着应用程序的增长…

那么Redux能为你做什么呢?

Redux就像应用程序中的本地存储，当你需要在应用程序的不同位置使用数据时，可以使用它。

基本上，Redux的想法最初来自于flux，但有一些根本性的变化，包括通过只创建一个存储来拥有一个真相来源的概念……

看看下面的图表，看看Flux和Redux之间的一些差异…

如果您的应用程序需要组件之间的通信，请考虑从一开始就在应用程序中应用Redux。

另外，阅读Redux文档中的这些词可能会有帮助:

As the requirements for JavaScript single-page applications have become increasingly complicated, our code must manage more state than ever before. This state can include server responses and cached data, as well as locally created data that has not yet been persisted to the server. UI state is also increasing in complexity, as we need to manage active routes, selected tabs, spinners, pagination controls, and so on. Managing this ever-changing state is hard. If a model can update another model, then a view can update a model, which updates another model, and this, in turn, might cause another view to update. At some point, you no longer understand what happens in your app as you have lost control over the when, why, and how of its state. When a system is opaque and non-deterministic, it's hard to reproduce bugs or add new features. As if this wasn't bad enough, consider the new requirements becoming common in front-end product development. As developers, we are expected to handle optimistic updates, server-side rendering, fetching data before performing route transitions, and so on. We find ourselves trying to manage a complexity that we have never had to deal with before, and we inevitably ask the question: is it time to give up? The answer is no. This complexity is difficult to handle as we're mixing two concepts that are very hard for the human mind to reason about: mutation and asynchronicity. I call them Mentos and Coke. Both can be great in separation, but together they create a mess. Libraries like React attempt to solve this problem in the view layer by removing both asynchrony and direct DOM manipulation. However, managing the state of your data is left up to you. This is where Redux enters. Following in the steps of Flux, CQRS, and Event Sourcing, Redux attempts to make state mutations predictable by imposing certain restrictions on how and when updates can happen. These restrictions are reflected in the three principles of Redux.