我有这样的东西:

$scope.traveler = [
            {  description: 'Senior', Amount: 50},
            {  description: 'Senior', Amount: 50},
            {  description: 'Adult', Amount: 75},
            {  description: 'Child', Amount: 35},
            {  description: 'Infant', Amount: 25 },
];

现在,为了得到这个数组的总数量,我做了这样的事情:

$scope.totalAmount = function(){
       var total = 0;
       for (var i = 0; i < $scope.traveler.length; i++) {
              total = total + $scope.traveler[i].Amount;
            }
       return total;
}

当只有一个数组时,这很容易,但我有其他具有不同属性名的数组,我想要求和。

如果我能做这样的事情,我会更快乐:

$scope.traveler.Sum({ Amount });

但我不知道怎样才能在将来重复使用它:

$scope.someArray.Sum({ someProperty });

当前回答

经过这些回答后,我认为实际上一个for(或forEach或for of with await)循环比reduce甚至map和reduce更具可读性。 认为:

在6个月后回到这段代码或者由其他人维护它。我认为你使用循环的方法已经足够好了。 在将来扩展这个函数,以防您想要添加货币转换或类似的功能。在一行代码中执行此操作并不是一个好主意。

Var traveler = [ {数量:50,描述:'高级'}, {数量:50,描述:'高级'}, {数量:75,描述:“成人”}, {数量:35,描述:'Child'}, {数量:25,描述:“婴儿”} ]; var sumFromArray = (propertyName, array) => { 设sum = 0; 数组中。forEach(item => { sum += item[propertyName] ?0; }); 返回总和; }; var sumOfTraveler = sumFromArray('Amount', traveler); console.log (sumOfTraveler);

使用类型你的函数定义可能像这样:

const sumFromArray = (propertyName: string, array: Array<{[propertyName: string]: number}>) => { ... };

类型文字中的计算属性名必须直接引用内置符号

我没有反对地图,减少或单行,这只是思考的食物。

其他回答

我知道这个问题已经有了一个公认的答案,但我认为我应该加入一个使用数组的替代方案。Reduce,因为对数组求和是Reduce的规范示例:

$scope.sum = function(items, prop){
    return items.reduce( function(a, b){
        return a + b[prop];
    }, 0);
};

$scope.travelerTotal = $scope.sum($scope.traveler, 'Amount');

小提琴

只是另一种说法,这就是原生JavaScript函数Map和Reduce的用途(Map和Reduce是许多语言中的强大功能)。

var traveler = [{description: 'Senior', Amount: 50},
                {description: 'Senior', Amount: 50},
                {description: 'Adult', Amount: 75},
                {description: 'Child', Amount: 35},
                {description: 'Infant', Amount: 25}];

function amount(item){
  return item.Amount;
}

function sum(prev, next){
  return prev + next;
}

traveler.map(amount).reduce(sum);
// => 235;

// or use arrow functions
traveler.map(item => item.Amount).reduce((prev, next) => prev + next);

注意:通过创建独立的小函数,我们可以再次使用它们。

// Example of reuse.
// Get only Amounts greater than 0;

// Also, while using Javascript, stick with camelCase.
// If you do decide to go against the standards, 
// then maintain your decision with all keys as in...

// { description: 'Senior', Amount: 50 }

// would be

// { Description: 'Senior', Amount: 50 };

var travelers = [{description: 'Senior', amount: 50},
                {description: 'Senior', amount: 50},
                {description: 'Adult', amount: 75},
                {description: 'Child', amount: 35},
                {description: 'Infant', amount: 0 }];

// Directly above Travelers array I changed "Amount" to "amount" to match standards.

function amount(item){
  return item.amount;
}

travelers.filter(amount);
// => [{description: 'Senior', amount: 50},
//     {description: 'Senior', amount: 50},
//     {description: 'Adult', amount: 75},
//     {description: 'Child', amount: 35}];
//     Does not include "Infant" as 0 is falsey.

您可以执行以下操作:

$scope.traveler.map(o=>o.Amount).reduce((a,c)=>a+c);

使用reduce和解构来求和

const traveler = [
  { description: 'Senior', Amount: 50 },
  { description: 'Senior', Amount: 50 },
  { description: 'Adult', Amount: 75 },
  { description: 'Child', Amount: 35 },
  { description: 'Infant', Amount: 25 },
];

console.log(traveler.reduce((n, {Amount}) => n + Amount, 0))

提高可读性和使用Map和Reduce的替代方案:

const traveler = [
    {  description: 'Senior', amount: 50 },
    {  description: 'Senior', amount: 50 },
    {  description: 'Adult', amount: 75 },
    {  description: 'Child', amount: 35 },
    {  description: 'Infant', amount: 25 },
];

const sum = traveler
  .map(item => item.amount)
  .reduce((prev, curr) => prev + curr, 0);

可重用功能:

const calculateSum = (obj, field) => obj
  .map(items => items.attributes[field])
  .reduce((prev, curr) => prev + curr, 0);