extension Array {
    subscript (safe index: Index) -> Element? {
        0 <= index && index < count ? self[index] : nil
    }
}

O(1)的性能 类型安全 正确处理[MyType?)(返回MyType??，可以在两个级别上展开) 不会导致set的问题吗 简洁的代码

这是我为你做的一些测试:

let itms: [Int?] = [0, nil]
let a = itms[safe: 0] // 0 : Int??
a ?? 5 // 0 : Int?
let b = itms[safe: 1] // nil : Int??
b ?? 5 // nil : Int? (`b` contains a value and that value is `nil`)
let c = itms[safe: 2] // nil : Int??
c ?? 5 // 5 : Int?

2022

无限索引访问和安全idx访问(如果没有这样的idex，则返回nil):

public extension Collection {
    subscript (safe index: Index) -> Element? {
        return indices.contains(index) ? self[index] : nil
    }

    subscript (infinityIdx idx: Index) -> Element where Index == Int {
        return self[ abs(idx) % self.count ]
    }
}

但是要小心，如果数组/集合为空，它将抛出异常

使用

(0...10)[safe: 11] // nil

(0...10)[infinityIdx: 11] // 0
(0...10)[infinityIdx: 12] // 1
(0...10)[infinityIdx: 21] // 0
(0...10)[infinityIdx: 22] // 1

适用于Swift 2

尽管这个问题已经被回答过很多次了，但我想给出一个更符合Swift编程时尚走向的答案，用Crusty的话来说就是:“先考虑协议”。

• What do we want to do? - Get an Element of an Array given an Index only when it's safe, and nil otherwise • What should this functionality base it's implementation on? - Array subscripting • Where does it get this feature from? - Its definition of struct Array in the Swift module has it • Nothing more generic/abstract? - It adopts protocol CollectionType which ensures it as well • Nothing more generic/abstract? - It adopts protocol Indexable as well... • Yup, sounds like the best we can do. Can we then extend it to have this feature we want? - But we have very limited types (no Int) and properties (no count) to work with now! • It will be enough. Swift's stdlib is done pretty well ;)

extension Indexable {
    public subscript(safe safeIndex: Index) -> _Element? {
        return safeIndex.distanceTo(endIndex) > 0 ? self[safeIndex] : nil
    }
}

不正确，但它给出了一个概念

extension Array {
    subscript (safe index: Index) -> Element? {
        0 <= index && index < count ? self[index] : nil
    }
}

O(1)的性能 类型安全 正确处理[MyType?)(返回MyType??，可以在两个级别上展开) 不会导致set的问题吗 简洁的代码

这是我为你做的一些测试:

let itms: [Int?] = [0, nil]
let a = itms[safe: 0] // 0 : Int??
a ?? 5 // 0 : Int?
let b = itms[safe: 1] // nil : Int??
b ?? 5 // nil : Int? (`b` contains a value and that value is `nil`)
let c = itms[safe: 2] // nil : Int??
c ?? 5 // 5 : Int?

extension Array {
  subscript (safe index: UInt) -> Element? {
    return Int(index) < count ? self[Int(index)] : nil
  }
}

使用上述提到的扩展返回nil，如果任何时候索引超出界限。

let fruits = ["apple","banana"]
print("result-\(fruits[safe : 2])")

结果-无

Alex的回答对这个问题有很好的建议和解决方案，然而，我碰巧发现了一个更好的实现这个功能的方法:

extension Collection {
    /// Returns the element at the specified index if it is within bounds, otherwise nil.
    subscript (safe index: Index) -> Element? {
        return indices.contains(index) ? self[index] : nil
    }
}

例子

let array = [1, 2, 3]

for index in -20...20 {
    if let item = array[safe: index] {
        print(item)
    }
}