这个问题已经问了几年了，但是这个扩展方法对我来说似乎更干净，使用当前版本的AutoMapper (3.2.1):

public static IMappingExpression<TSource, TDestination> IgnoreUnmappedProperties<TSource, TDestination>(this IMappingExpression<TSource, TDestination> expression)
{
    var typeMap = Mapper.FindTypeMapFor<TSource, TDestination>();
    if (typeMap != null)
    {
        foreach (var unmappedPropertyName in typeMap.GetUnmappedPropertyNames())
        {
            expression.ForMember(unmappedPropertyName, opt => opt.Ignore());
        }
    }

    return expression;
}

这似乎是一个老问题，但我想我会把我的答案贴出来给那些长得像我的人。

我使用ConstructUsing，对象初始化器加上ForAllMembers忽略例如

    Mapper.CreateMap<Source, Target>()
        .ConstructUsing(
            f =>
                new Target
                    {
                        PropVal1 = f.PropVal1,
                        PropObj2 = Map<PropObj2Class>(f.PropObj2),
                        PropVal4 = f.PropVal4
                    })
        .ForAllMembers(a => a.Ignore());

在3.3.1版本中，您可以使用IgnoreAllPropertiesWithAnInaccessibleSetter()或IgnoreAllSourcePropertiesWithAnInaccessibleSetter()方法。

默认情况下，AutoMapper使用目标类型来验证成员，但您可以通过使用MemberList跳过验证。没有选择。

var configuration = new MapperConfiguration(cfg =>
  cfg.CreateMap<Source2, Destination2>(MemberList.None);
);

你可以在这里找到参考资料

我更新了Robert Schroeder对AutoMapper 4.2的答案。对于非静态映射器配置，我们不能使用mapper . getalltypemaps()，但表达式有一个对所需的TypeMap的引用:

public static IMappingExpression<TSource, TDestination> 
    IgnoreAllNonExisting<TSource, TDestination>(this IMappingExpression<TSource, TDestination> expression)
{
    foreach (var property in expression.TypeMap.GetUnmappedPropertyNames())
    {
        expression.ForMember(property, opt => opt.Ignore());
    }
    return expression;
}

The only infromation about ignoring many of members is this thread - http://groups.google.com/group/automapper-users/browse_thread/thread/9928ce9f2ffa641f . I think you can use the trick used in ProvidingCommonBaseClassConfiguration to ignore common properties for similar classes. And there is no information about the "Ignore the rest" functionality. I've looked at the code before and it seems to me that will be very and very hard to add such functionality. Also you can try to use some attribute and mark with it ignored properties and add some generic/common code to ignore all marked properties.