根据@Stephane LaFlèche的回答，我提出了另一个剧本版本。

JSFiddle演示

var obj = {"a":{"b":{"c":"Hello World"}},"resTest":"potato","success":"This path exists"};
checkForPathInObject = function(object,path,value) {
        var pathParts   = path.split("."),
            result      = false;
        // Check if required parameters are set; if not, return false
        if(!object || typeof object == 'undefined' || !path || typeof path != 'string')
            return false;
        /* Loop through object keys to find a way to the path or check for value
         * If the property does not exist, set result to false
         * If the property is an object, update @object
         * Otherwise, update result */
        for(var i=0;i<pathParts.length;i++){
            var currentPathPart = pathParts[i];
            if(!object.hasOwnProperty( currentPathPart )) {
                result = false;
            } else if (object[ currentPathPart ] && path == pathParts[i]) {
                result = pathParts[i];
                break;
            } else if(typeof object[ currentPathPart ] == 'object') {
                object = object[ currentPathPart ];
            } else {
                result = object[ currentPathPart ];
            }
        }
        /* */
        if(typeof value != 'undefined' && value == result)
            return true;
        return result;
};
// Uncomment the lines below to test the script
// alert( checkForPathInObject(obj,'a.b.c') ); // Results "Hello World"
// alert( checkForPathInObject(obj,'a.success') ); // Returns false
// alert( checkForPathInObject(obj,'resTest', 'potato') ); // Returns true

我知道这个问题很古老，但我想通过将其添加到所有对象来提供一个扩展。我知道人们倾向于不赞成使用Object原型来实现扩展的对象功能，但我发现没有什么比这更容易的了。此外，现在还允许使用Object.defineProperty方法。

Object.defineProperty( Object.prototype, "has", { value: function( needle ) {
    var obj = this;
    var needles = needle.split( "." );
    for( var i = 0; i<needles.length; i++ ) {
        if( !obj.hasOwnProperty(needles[i])) {
            return false;
        }
        obj = obj[needles[i]];
    }
    return true;
}});

现在，为了测试任何对象中的任何属性，只需执行以下操作：

if( obj.has("some.deep.nested.object.somewhere") )

这里有一个jsfiddle来测试它，特别是它包含一些jQuery，如果您直接修改Object.prototype，因为属性变为可枚举，则会中断。这对于第三方图书馆来说应该很好。

您可以尝试可选链接（但要注意浏览器兼容性）。

let test = {level1: {level2: {level3: 'level3'}}};

let level3 = test?.level1?.level2?.level3;
console.log(level3); // level3

level3 = test?.level0?.level1?.level2?.level3;
console.log(level3); // undefined

有一个babel插件（@babel/plugin建议可选链接）用于光学通道。所以，如果需要，请升级您的babel。

怎么样

try {
   alert(test.level1.level2.level3)
} catch(e) {
 ...whatever

}

今天刚刚编写了这个函数，它对嵌套对象中的属性进行了深入搜索，如果找到了，则返回该属性的值。

/**
 * Performs a deep search looking for the existence of a property in a 
 * nested object. Supports namespaced search: Passing a string with
 * a parent sub-object where the property key may exist speeds up
 * search, for instance: Say you have a nested object and you know for 
 * certain the property/literal you're looking for is within a certain
 * sub-object, you can speed the search up by passing "level2Obj.targetProp"
 * @param {object} obj Object to search
 * @param {object} key Key to search for
 * @return {*} Returns the value (if any) located at the key
 */
var getPropByKey = function( obj, key ) {
    var ret = false, ns = key.split("."),
        args = arguments,
        alen = args.length;

    // Search starting with provided namespace
    if ( ns.length > 1 ) {
        obj = (libName).getPropByKey( obj, ns[0] );
        key = ns[1];
    }

    // Look for a property in the object
    if ( key in obj ) {
        return obj[key];
    } else {
        for ( var o in obj ) {
            if ( (libName).isPlainObject( obj[o] ) ) {
                ret = (libName).getPropByKey( obj[o], key );
                if ( ret === 0 || ret === undefined || ret ) {
                    return ret;
                }
            }
        }
    }

    return false;
}

还有一个非常紧凑的：

function ifSet(object, path) {
  return path.split('.').reduce((obj, part) => obj && obj[part], object)
}

打电话：

let a = {b:{c:{d:{e:'found!'}}}}
ifSet(a, 'b.c.d.e') == 'found!'
ifSet(a, 'a.a.a.a.a.a') == undefined

它的性能不会很好，因为它拆分了一个字符串（但增加了调用的可读性），并遍历所有内容，即使已经很明显找不到任何内容（但提高了函数本身的可读性。

至少比get快http://jsben.ch/aAtmc