查看Effective Java，第2版第27页。 第7项:避免终结词

终结器是不可预测的，通常是危险的，而且通常是不必要的。永远不要在终结器中做任何时间紧迫的事情。从来没有 依赖终结器更新关键持久状态。

要终止一个资源，请使用try-finally:

// try-finally块保证终止方法的执行 Foo Foo =新的Foo(…); 尝试{ //用foo做必须做的事情 .．. }最后{ foo.terminate ();//显式终止方法 ｝

An Object becomes eligible for Garbage collection or GC if its not reachable from any live threads or any static refrences in other words you can say that an object becomes eligible for garbage collection if its all references are null. Cyclic dependencies are not counted as reference so if Object A has reference of object B and object B has reference of Object A and they don't have any other live reference then both Objects A and B will be eligible for Garbage collection. Generally an object becomes eligible for garbage collection in Java on following cases:

该对象的所有引用显式设置为空，例如object = null 对象在块内创建，一旦控件退出该块，引用就会离开作用域。 父对象设置为空，如果一个对象持有另一个对象的引用，并且当您将容器对象的引用设置为空时，子对象或包含对象自动符合垃圾收集的条件。 如果一个对象只有通过WeakHashMap的活动引用，那么它就有资格进行垃圾收集。

正如在https://wiki.sei.cmu.edu/confluence/display/java/MET12-J.+Do+not+use+finalizers上指出的那样，

There is no fixed time at which finalizers must be executed because time of execution depends on the Java Virtual Machine (JVM). The only guarantee is that any finalizer method that executes will do so sometime after the associated object has become unreachable (detected during the first cycle of garbage collection) and sometime before the garbage collector reclaims the associated object's storage (during the garbage collector's second cycle). Execution of an object's finalizer may be delayed for an arbitrarily long time after the object becomes unreachable. Consequently, invoking time-critical functionality such as closing file handles in an object's finalize() method is problematic.

一般来说，最好不要依赖finalize()来做任何清理等。

根据Javadoc(值得一读)，它是:

当垃圾回收确定对象不再有引用时，由垃圾回收器在对象上调用。

正如Joachim指出的，如果对象总是可访问的，那么在程序的生命周期中，这可能永远不会发生。

此外，垃圾收集器不保证在任何特定时间运行。一般来说，我想说的是finalize()可能不是最好的方法，除非有特定的事情需要它。

在最近与终结器方法搏斗之后(为了在测试期间处理连接池)，我不得不说终结器缺少很多东西。使用VisualVM来观察以及使用弱引用来跟踪实际的交互，我发现以下事情在Java 8环境中是正确的(Oracle JDK, Ubuntu 15):

Finalize is not called immediately the Finalizer (GC part) individually owns the reference elusively The default Garbage Collector pools unreachable objects Finalize is called in bulk pointing to an implementation detail that there is a certain phase the garbage collector frees the resources. Calling System.gc() often does not result in objects being finalized more often, it just results in the Finalizer getting aware of an unreachable object more rapidly Creating a thread dump almost always result in triggering the finalizer due to high heap overhead during performing the heap dump or some other internal mechanism Finalization seams to be bound by either memory requirements (free up more memory) or by the list of objects being marked for finalization growing of a certain internal limit. So if you have a lot of objects getting finalized the finalization phase will be triggered more often and earlier when compared with only a few There were circumstances a System.gc() triggered a finalize directly but only if the reference was a local and short living. This might be generation related.

最后认为

最后确定方法是不可靠的，但只能用于一件事。您可以确保在垃圾收集之前关闭或释放对象，从而在正确处理涉及生命结束操作的更复杂生命周期的对象时实现故障安全。这是我能想到的一个值得我们去推翻它的原因。

Finalize将打印出类创建的计数。

protected void finalize() throws Throwable {
    System.out.println("Run F" );
    if ( checkedOut)
        System.out.println("Error: Checked out");
        System.out.println("Class Create Count: " + classCreate);
}

main

while ( true) {
    Book novel=new Book(true);
    //System.out.println(novel.checkedOut);
    //Runtime.getRuntime().runFinalization();
    novel.checkIn();
    new Book(true);
    //System.runFinalization();
    System.gc();

如你所见。下面的输出显示了类计数为36时第一次执行的gc。

C:\javaCode\firstClass>java TerminationCondition
Run F
Error: Checked out
Class Create Count: 36
Run F
Error: Checked out
Class Create Count: 48
Run F