例子:
absolute="/foo/bar"
current="/foo/baz/foo"
# Magic
relative="../../bar"
我如何创造魔法(希望不是太复杂的代码…)?
当前回答
我把你的问题作为一个挑战，用“可移植的”shell代码来编写它，即。
考虑到POSIX外壳 没有数组之类的bashisms 避免像打瘟疫一样打外部电话。脚本中没有一个分叉!这使得它非常快，特别是在有显著分叉开销的系统上，比如cygwin。 必须处理路径名中的glob字符(*，?，[，])
它运行在任何POSIX兼容shell (zsh, bash, ksh, ash, busybox，…)上。它甚至包含一个测试套件来验证其操作。路径名的规范化留作练习。: -)
#!/bin/sh
# Find common parent directory path for a pair of paths.
# Call with two pathnames as args, e.g.
# commondirpart foo/bar foo/baz/bat -> result="foo/"
# The result is either empty or ends with "/".
commondirpart () {
result=""
while test ${#1} -gt 0 -a ${#2} -gt 0; do
if test "${1%${1#?}}" != "${2%${2#?}}"; then # First characters the same?
break # No, we're done comparing.
fi
result="$result${1%${1#?}}" # Yes, append to result.
set -- "${1#?}" "${2#?}" # Chop first char off both strings.
done
case "$result" in
(""|*/) ;;
(*) result="${result%/*}/";;
esac
}
# Turn foo/bar/baz into ../../..
#
dir2dotdot () {
OLDIFS="$IFS" IFS="/" result=""
for dir in $1; do
result="$result../"
done
result="${result%/}"
IFS="$OLDIFS"
}
# Call with FROM TO args.
relativepath () {
case "$1" in
(*//*|*/./*|*/../*|*?/|*/.|*/..)
printf '%s\n' "'$1' not canonical"; exit 1;;
(/*)
from="${1#?}";;
(*)
printf '%s\n' "'$1' not absolute"; exit 1;;
esac
case "$2" in
(*//*|*/./*|*/../*|*?/|*/.|*/..)
printf '%s\n' "'$2' not canonical"; exit 1;;
(/*)
to="${2#?}";;
(*)
printf '%s\n' "'$2' not absolute"; exit 1;;
esac
case "$to" in
("$from") # Identical directories.
result=".";;
("$from"/*) # From /x to /x/foo/bar -> foo/bar
result="${to##$from/}";;
("") # From /foo/bar to / -> ../..
dir2dotdot "$from";;
(*)
case "$from" in
("$to"/*) # From /x/foo/bar to /x -> ../..
dir2dotdot "${from##$to/}";;
(*) # Everything else.
commondirpart "$from" "$to"
common="$result"
dir2dotdot "${from#$common}"
result="$result/${to#$common}"
esac
;;
esac
}
set -f # noglob
set -x
cat <<EOF |
/ / .
/- /- .
/? /? .
/?? /?? .
/??? /??? .
/?* /?* .
/* /* .
/* /** ../**
/* /*** ../***
/*.* /*.** ../*.**
/*.??? /*.?? ../*.??
/[] /[] .
/[a-z]* /[0-9]* ../[0-9]*
/foo /foo .
/foo / ..
/foo/bar / ../..
/foo/bar /foo ..
/foo/bar /foo/baz ../baz
/foo/bar /bar/foo ../../bar/foo
/foo/bar/baz /gnarf/blurfl/blubb ../../../gnarf/blurfl/blubb
/foo/bar/baz /gnarf ../../../gnarf
/foo/bar/baz /foo/baz ../../baz
/foo. /bar. ../bar.
EOF
while read FROM TO VIA; do
relativepath "$FROM" "$TO"
printf '%s\n' "FROM: $FROM" "TO: $TO" "VIA: $result"
if test "$result" != "$VIA"; then
printf '%s\n' "OOOPS! Expected '$VIA' but got '$result'"
fi
done
# vi: set tabstop=3 shiftwidth=3 expandtab fileformat=unix :
其他回答
这里的答案并不是每天都能用的。由于在纯bash中很难正确地做到这一点，我建议以下可靠的解决方案(类似于注释中的一个建议):
function relpath() {
python -c "import os,sys;print(os.path.relpath(*(sys.argv[1:])))" "$@";
}
然后，你可以得到基于当前目录的相对路径:
echo $(relpath somepath)
或者你可以指定路径相对于给定的目录:
echo $(relpath somepath /etc) # relative to /etc
一个缺点是这需要python，但是:
它在任何python >= 2.6中工作相同 它不要求文件或目录存在。 文件名可以包含更广泛的特殊字符。 例如，如果文件名包含 空格或其他特殊字符。 它是一个单行函数，不会使脚本混乱。
注意，包含basename或dirname的解决方案不一定更好，因为它们要求安装coreutils。如果有人有可靠而简单的纯bash解决方案(而不是令人费解的好奇心)，我会感到惊讶。
该脚本仅对绝对路径或没有绝对路径的相对路径的输入提供正确的结果。或者. .:
#!/bin/bash
# usage: relpath from to
if [[ "$1" == "$2" ]]
then
echo "."
exit
fi
IFS="/"
current=($1)
absolute=($2)
abssize=${#absolute[@]}
cursize=${#current[@]}
while [[ ${absolute[level]} == ${current[level]} ]]
do
(( level++ ))
if (( level > abssize || level > cursize ))
then
break
fi
done
for ((i = level; i < cursize; i++))
do
if ((i > level))
then
newpath=$newpath"/"
fi
newpath=$newpath".."
done
for ((i = level; i < abssize; i++))
do
if [[ -n $newpath ]]
then
newpath=$newpath"/"
fi
newpath=$newpath${absolute[i]}
done
echo "$newpath"
我使用的macOS默认情况下没有realpath命令，所以我做了一个纯bash函数来计算它。
#!/bin/bash
##
# print a relative path from "source folder" to "target file"
#
# params:
# $1 - target file, can be a relative path or an absolute path.
# $2 - source folder, can be a relative path or an absolute path.
#
# test:
# $ mkdir -p ~/A/B/C/D; touch ~/A/B/C/D/testfile.txt; touch ~/A/B/testfile.txt
#
# $ getRelativePath ~/A/B/C/D/testfile.txt ~/A/B
# $ C/D/testfile.txt
#
# $ getRelativePath ~/A/B/testfile.txt ~/A/B/C
# $ ../testfile.txt
#
# $ getRelativePath ~/A/B/testfile.txt /
# $ home/bunnier/A/B/testfile.txt
#
function getRelativePath(){
local targetFilename=$(basename $1)
local targetFolder=$(cd $(dirname $1);pwd) # absolute target folder path
local currentFolder=$(cd $2;pwd) # absulute source folder
local result=.
while [ "$currentFolder" != "$targetFolder" ];do
if [[ "$targetFolder" =~ "$currentFolder"* ]];then
pointSegment=${targetFolder#$currentFolder}
result=$result/${pointSegment#/}
break
fi
result="$result"/..
currentFolder=$(dirname $currentFolder)
done
result=$result/$targetFilename
echo ${result#./}
}
另一个解决方案，纯bash + GNU readlink，在以下上下文中易于使用:
ln -s "$(relpath "$A" "$B")" "$B"
编辑:确保“$B”是不存在或没有软链接在这种情况下，否则relpath遵循这个链接，这不是你想要的!
这几乎适用于当前所有的Linux。如果readlink -m在您这边不起作用，请尝试readlink -f。请参见https://gist.github.com/hilbix/1ec361d00a8178ae8ea0查看可能的更新:
: relpath A B
# Calculate relative path from A to B, returns true on success
# Example: ln -s "$(relpath "$A" "$B")" "$B"
relpath()
{
local X Y A
# We can create dangling softlinks
X="$(readlink -m -- "$1")" || return
Y="$(readlink -m -- "$2")" || return
X="${X%/}/"
A=""
while Y="${Y%/*}"
[ ".${X#"$Y"/}" = ".$X" ]
do
A="../$A"
done
X="$A${X#"$Y"/}"
X="${X%/}"
echo "${X:-.}"
}
注:
Care was taken that it is safe against unwanted shell meta character expansion, in case filenames contain * or ?. The output is meant to be usable as the first argument to ln -s: relpath / / gives . and not the empty string relpath a a gives a, even if a happens to be a directory Most common cases were tested to give reasonable results, too. This solution uses string prefix matching, hence readlink is required to canonicalize paths. Thanks to readlink -m it works for not yet existing paths, too.
在旧系统上，readlink -m不可用，如果文件不存在，readlink -f将失败。所以你可能需要一些像这样的解决方法(未经测试!):
readlink_missing()
{
readlink -m -- "$1" && return
readlink -f -- "$1" && return
[ -e . ] && echo "$(readlink_missing "$(dirname "$1")")/$(basename "$1")"
}
这在$1包含的情况下是不正确的。或. .对于不存在的路径(如/doesnotexist/./a)，但它应该涵盖大多数情况。
(用readlink_missing替换上面的readlink -m——)
编辑，因为下面是反对票
下面是一个测试，这个函数确实是正确的:
check()
{
res="$(relpath "$2" "$1")"
[ ".$res" = ".$3" ] && return
printf ':WRONG: %-10q %-10q gives %q\nCORRECT %-10q %-10q gives %q\n' "$1" "$2" "$res" "$@"
}
# TARGET SOURCE RESULT
check "/A/B/C" "/A" ".."
check "/A/B/C" "/A.x" "../../A.x"
check "/A/B/C" "/A/B" "."
check "/A/B/C" "/A/B/C" "C"
check "/A/B/C" "/A/B/C/D" "C/D"
check "/A/B/C" "/A/B/C/D/E" "C/D/E"
check "/A/B/C" "/A/B/D" "D"
check "/A/B/C" "/A/B/D/E" "D/E"
check "/A/B/C" "/A/D" "../D"
check "/A/B/C" "/A/D/E" "../D/E"
check "/A/B/C" "/D/E/F" "../../D/E/F"
check "/foo/baz/moo" "/foo/bar" "../bar"
困惑吗?好吧，这是正确的结果!即使你认为它不符合问题，以下是正确的证明:
check "http://example.com/foo/baz/moo" "http://example.com/foo/bar" "../bar"
毫无疑问，……/bar是从页面moo中看到的页面栏的准确且唯一正确的相对路径。其他一切都是完全错误的。
采用问题的输出很简单，显然假设current是一个目录:
absolute="/foo/bar"
current="/foo/baz/foo"
relative="../$(relpath "$absolute" "$current")"
这将返回所请求的内容。
在你感到惊讶之前，这里有一个稍微复杂一点的relpath变体(注意细微的区别)，它也应该适用于url语法(因此，由于一些bash魔法，末尾/幸存下来):
# Calculate relative PATH to the given DEST from the given BASE
# In the URL case, both URLs must be absolute and have the same Scheme.
# The `SCHEME:` must not be present in the FS either.
# This way this routine works for file paths an
: relpathurl DEST BASE
relpathurl()
{
local X Y A
# We can create dangling softlinks
X="$(readlink -m -- "$1")" || return
Y="$(readlink -m -- "$2")" || return
X="${X%/}/${1#"${1%/}"}"
Y="${Y%/}${2#"${2%/}"}"
A=""
while Y="${Y%/*}"
[ ".${X#"$Y"/}" = ".$X" ]
do
A="../$A"
done
X="$A${X#"$Y"/}"
X="${X%/}"
echo "${X:-.}"
}
这里有一些检查，只是为了弄清楚:它确实像所说的那样工作。
check()
{
res="$(relpathurl "$2" "$1")"
[ ".$res" = ".$3" ] && return
printf ':WRONG: %-10q %-10q gives %q\nCORRECT %-10q %-10q gives %q\n' "$1" "$2" "$res" "$@"
}
# TARGET SOURCE RESULT
check "/A/B/C" "/A" ".."
check "/A/B/C" "/A.x" "../../A.x"
check "/A/B/C" "/A/B" "."
check "/A/B/C" "/A/B/C" "C"
check "/A/B/C" "/A/B/C/D" "C/D"
check "/A/B/C" "/A/B/C/D/E" "C/D/E"
check "/A/B/C" "/A/B/D" "D"
check "/A/B/C" "/A/B/D/E" "D/E"
check "/A/B/C" "/A/D" "../D"
check "/A/B/C" "/A/D/E" "../D/E"
check "/A/B/C" "/D/E/F" "../../D/E/F"
check "/foo/baz/moo" "/foo/bar" "../bar"
check "http://example.com/foo/baz/moo" "http://example.com/foo/bar" "../bar"
check "http://example.com/foo/baz/moo/" "http://example.com/foo/bar" "../../bar"
check "http://example.com/foo/baz/moo" "http://example.com/foo/bar/" "../bar/"
check "http://example.com/foo/baz/moo/" "http://example.com/foo/bar/" "../../bar/"
下面是如何用它从问题中得到想要的结果:
absolute="/foo/bar"
current="/foo/baz/foo"
relative="$(relpathurl "$absolute" "$current/")"
echo "$relative"
如果你发现什么东西不起作用，请在下面的评论中告诉我。谢谢。
PS:
为什么relpath的论点与这里的所有其他答案相反?
如果你改变
Y="$(readlink -m -- "$2")" || return
to
Y="$(readlink -m -- "${2:-"$PWD"}")" || return
然后你可以去掉第二个参数，这样BASE就是当前目录/URL/任何东西。这只是Unix的原则。
这个答案并没有解决问题的Bash部分，但是因为我试图使用这个问题中的答案在Emacs中实现这个功能，所以我就把它扔到那里。
Emacs实际上有一个开箱即用的函数:
ELISP> (file-relative-name "/a/b/c" "/a/b/c")
"."
ELISP> (file-relative-name "/a/b/c" "/a/b")
"c"
ELISP> (file-relative-name "/a/b/c" "/c/b")
"../../a/b/c"
