最初的帖子包含了解决方案(忽略回复，他们没有添加任何有用的东西)。有趣的工作是由前面提到的unix命令readlink和选项-f完成的。当以绝对路径和相对路径调用脚本时，此方法有效。

对于bash, sh, ksh:

#!/bin/bash 
# Absolute path to this script, e.g. /home/user/bin/foo.sh
SCRIPT=$(readlink -f "$0")
# Absolute path this script is in, thus /home/user/bin
SCRIPTPATH=$(dirname "$SCRIPT")
echo $SCRIPTPATH

对于tcsh, csh:

#!/bin/tcsh
# Absolute path to this script, e.g. /home/user/bin/foo.csh
set SCRIPT=`readlink -f "$0"`
# Absolute path this script is in, thus /home/user/bin
set SCRIPTPATH=`dirname "$SCRIPT"`
echo $SCRIPTPATH

参见:https://stackoverflow.com/a/246128/59087

对于tcsh，您可以使用:h变量修饰符来检索路径。

需要注意的是，如果脚本作为tcsh myscript执行。Csh，那么您将只获得脚本名称。一个解决方法是验证路径，如下所示。

#!/bin/tcsh

set SCRIPT_PATH = $0:h
if ( $SCRIPT_PATH == $0 ) then
        set SCRIPT_PATH = "."
endif

$SCRIPT_PATH/compile.csh > $SCRIPT_PATH/results.txt

关于变量修饰语的更多信息可以在https://learnxinyminutes.com/docs/tcsh/上找到

在Bash中，你应该像这样得到你需要的东西:

#!/usr/bin/env bash

BASEDIR=$(dirname "$0")
echo "$BASEDIR"

灵感来自blueyed的回答

read < <(readlink -f $0 | xargs dirname)
cd $REPLY

So many answers, all plausible, each with pro's and con's & slightly differeing objectives (which should probably be stated for each). Here's another solution that meets a primary objective of both being clear and working across all systems, on all bash (no assumptions about bash versions, or readlink or pwd options), and reasonably does what you'd expect to happen (eg, resolving symlinks is an interesting problem, but isn't usually what you actually want), handle edge cases like spaces in paths, etc., ignores any errors and uses a sane default if there are any issues.

每个组件都存储在一个单独的变量中，您可以单独使用:

# script path, filename, directory
PROG_PATH=${BASH_SOURCE[0]}      # this script's name
PROG_NAME=${PROG_PATH##*/}       # basename of script (strip path)
PROG_DIR="$(cd "$(dirname "${PROG_PATH:-$PWD}")" 2>/dev/null 1>&2 && pwd)"

cd $(dirname $(readlink -f $0))