这不是一个很简单的手术吗?但是,我看到既没有size()也没有length()方法。
当前回答
如果你有一个ResultSet类型的ResultSet。TYPE_FORWARD_ONLY您希望保持这种方式(而不是切换到ResultSet)。TYPE_SCROLL_INSENSITIVE或ResultSet。TYPE_SCROLL_INSENSITIVE,以便能够使用.last())。
我建议一种非常有效的破解方法,即在顶部添加第一个包含行数的伪/伪行。
例子
假设您的查询如下
select MYBOOL,MYINT,MYCHAR,MYSMALLINT,MYVARCHAR
from MYTABLE
where ...blahblah...
输出是这样的
true 65537 "Hey" -32768 "The quick brown fox"
false 123456 "Sup" 300 "The lazy dog"
false -123123 "Yo" 0 "Go ahead and jump"
false 3 "EVH" 456 "Might as well jump"
...
[1000 total rows]
简单地重构你的代码,就像这样:
Statement s=myConnection.createStatement(ResultSet.TYPE_FORWARD_ONLY,
ResultSet.CONCUR_READ_ONLY);
String from_where="FROM myTable WHERE ...blahblah... ";
//h4x
ResultSet rs=s.executeQuery("select count(*)as RECORDCOUNT,"
+ "cast(null as boolean)as MYBOOL,"
+ "cast(null as int)as MYINT,"
+ "cast(null as char(1))as MYCHAR,"
+ "cast(null as smallint)as MYSMALLINT,"
+ "cast(null as varchar(1))as MYVARCHAR "
+from_where
+"UNION ALL "//the "ALL" part prevents internal re-sorting to prevent duplicates (and we do not want that)
+"select cast(null as int)as RECORDCOUNT,"
+ "MYBOOL,MYINT,MYCHAR,MYSMALLINT,MYVARCHAR "
+from_where);
您的查询输出将如下所示
1000 null null null null null
null true 65537 "Hey" -32768 "The quick brown fox"
null false 123456 "Sup" 300 "The lazy dog"
null false -123123 "Yo" 0 "Go ahead and jump"
null false 3 "EVH" 456 "Might as well jump"
...
[1001 total rows]
所以你必须
if(rs.next())
System.out.println("Recordcount: "+rs.getInt("RECORDCOUNT"));//hack: first record contains the record count
while(rs.next())
//do your stuff
其他回答
int i = 0;
while(rs.next()) {
i++;
}
theStatement=theConnection.createStatement(ResultSet.TYPE_SCROLL_INSENSITIVE, ResultSet.CONCUR_READ_ONLY);
ResultSet theResult=theStatement.executeQuery(query);
//Get the size of the data returned
theResult.last();
int size = theResult.getRow() * theResult.getMetaData().getColumnCount();
theResult.beforeFirst();
(速度考虑)
很多人在这里建议ResultSet.last(),但你需要打开连接作为一个ResultSet。TYPE_SCROLL_INSENSITIVE,对于Derby嵌入式数据库,它比ResultSet.TYPE_FORWARD_ONLY慢10倍。
根据我对嵌入式Derby和H2数据库的微型测试,在SELECT之前调用SELECT COUNT(*)要快得多。
下面是我的代码和基准测试的更详细信息
SELECT COUNT(*) FROM…查询。
OR
int size =0;
if (rs != null)
{
rs.last(); // moves cursor to the last row
size = rs.getRow(); // get row id
}
在这两种情况下,都不需要遍历整个数据。
ResultSet rs = ps.executeQuery();
int rowcount = 0;
if (rs.last()) {
rowcount = rs.getRow();
rs.beforeFirst(); // not rs.first() because the rs.next() below will move on, missing the first element
}
while (rs.next()) {
// do your standard per row stuff
}
推荐文章
- Java 8接口方法中不允许“同步”的原因是什么?
- 选项(RECOMPILE)总是更快;为什么?
- 设置数据库从单用户模式到多用户
- 如何找到Java堆大小和内存使用(Linux)?
- oracle中的RANK()和DENSE_RANK()函数有什么区别?
- 的类型不能用作索引中的键列
- SQL逻辑运算符优先级:And和Or
- 使用Enum实现单例(Java)
- 如何检查一个表是否存在于给定的模式中
- RabbitMQ与通道和连接之间的关系
- 添加一个复合主键
- buildSessionFactory()配置方法在Hibernate中已弃用?
- Spring MVC -如何获得所有的请求参数在一个地图在Spring控制器?
- 如何在SQL Server Management Studio中查看查询历史
- 如何在Java中按两个字段排序?