我更喜欢使用等待和通知。它简单明了。

@Test
public void test() throws Throwable {
    final boolean[] asyncExecuted = {false};
    final Throwable[] asyncThrowable= {null};

    // do anything async
    new Thread(new Runnable() {
        @Override
        public void run() {
            try {
                // Put your test here.
                fail(); 
            }
            // lets inform the test thread that there is an error.
            catch (Throwable throwable){
                asyncThrowable[0] = throwable;
            }
            // ensure to release asyncExecuted in case of error.
            finally {
                synchronized (asyncExecuted){
                    asyncExecuted[0] = true;
                    asyncExecuted.notify();
                }
            }
        }
    }).start();

    // Waiting for the test is complete
    synchronized (asyncExecuted){
        while(!asyncExecuted[0]){
            asyncExecuted.wait();
        }
    }

    // get any async error, including exceptions and assertationErrors
    if(asyncThrowable[0] != null){
        throw asyncThrowable[0];
    }
}

基本上，我们需要创建一个最终的数组引用，在匿名内部类中使用。我宁愿创建一个布尔[]，因为如果我们需要wait()，我可以设置一个值来控制。当一切都完成后，我们只需释放asyncExecuted。

我更喜欢使用等待和通知。它简单明了。

@Test
public void test() throws Throwable {
    final boolean[] asyncExecuted = {false};
    final Throwable[] asyncThrowable= {null};

    // do anything async
    new Thread(new Runnable() {
        @Override
        public void run() {
            try {
                // Put your test here.
                fail(); 
            }
            // lets inform the test thread that there is an error.
            catch (Throwable throwable){
                asyncThrowable[0] = throwable;
            }
            // ensure to release asyncExecuted in case of error.
            finally {
                synchronized (asyncExecuted){
                    asyncExecuted[0] = true;
                    asyncExecuted.notify();
                }
            }
        }
    }).start();

    // Waiting for the test is complete
    synchronized (asyncExecuted){
        while(!asyncExecuted[0]){
            asyncExecuted.wait();
        }
    }

    // get any async error, including exceptions and assertationErrors
    if(asyncThrowable[0] != null){
        throw asyncThrowable[0];
    }
}

基本上，我们需要创建一个最终的数组引用，在匿名内部类中使用。我宁愿创建一个布尔[]，因为如果我们需要wait()，我可以设置一个值来控制。当一切都完成后，我们只需释放asyncExecuted。

对于测试异步方法，我发现一个非常有用的方法是在测试对象的构造函数中注入Executor实例。在生产中，执行器实例被配置为异步运行，而在测试中，它可以被模拟为同步运行。

所以假设我试图测试异步方法Foo#doAsync(Callback c)，

class Foo {
  private final Executor executor;
  public Foo(Executor executor) {
    this.executor = executor;
  }

  public void doAsync(Callback c) {
    executor.execute(new Runnable() {
      @Override public void run() {
        // Do stuff here
        c.onComplete(data);
      }
    });
  }
}

在生产中，我会用Executors.newSingleThreadExecutor() Executor实例构造Foo，而在测试中，我可能会用执行以下操作的同步执行器构造它

class SynchronousExecutor implements Executor {
  @Override public void execute(Runnable r) {
    r.run();
  }
}

现在异步方法的JUnit测试非常干净

@Test public void testDoAsync() {
  Executor executor = new SynchronousExecutor();
  Foo objectToTest = new Foo(executor);

  Callback callback = mock(Callback.class);
  objectToTest.doAsync(callback);

  // Verify that Callback#onComplete was called using Mockito.
  verify(callback).onComplete(any(Data.class));

  // Assert that we got back the data that we expected.
  assertEquals(expectedData, callback.getData());
}

值得一提的是，《并发实践》中有一章非常有用，它描述了一些单元测试方法，并给出了解决问题的方案。

如果测试结果是异步生成的，这就是我现在使用的方法。

public class TestUtil {

    public static <R> R await(Consumer<CompletableFuture<R>> completer) {
        return await(20, TimeUnit.SECONDS, completer);
    }

    public static <R> R await(int time, TimeUnit unit, Consumer<CompletableFuture<R>> completer) {
        CompletableFuture<R> f = new CompletableFuture<>();
        completer.accept(f);
        try {
            return f.get(time, unit);
        } catch (InterruptedException | TimeoutException e) {
            throw new RuntimeException("Future timed out", e);
        } catch (ExecutionException e) {
            throw new RuntimeException("Future failed", e.getCause());
        }
    }
}

使用静态导入，测试读起来还不错。 (注意，在这个例子中，我开始一个线程来说明这个想法)

    @Test
    public void testAsync() {
        String result = await(f -> {
            new Thread(() -> f.complete("My Result")).start();
        });
        assertEquals("My Result", result);
    }

如果未调用f.f complete，测试将在超时后失败。你也可以使用f.c earteexceptions来提前失败。

我找到一个库套接字。IO来测试异步逻辑。使用LinkedBlockingQueue看起来简单。这里有一个例子:

    @Test(timeout = TIMEOUT)
public void message() throws URISyntaxException, InterruptedException {
    final BlockingQueue<Object> values = new LinkedBlockingQueue<Object>();

    socket = client();
    socket.on(Socket.EVENT_CONNECT, new Emitter.Listener() {
        @Override
        public void call(Object... objects) {
            socket.send("foo", "bar");
        }
    }).on(Socket.EVENT_MESSAGE, new Emitter.Listener() {
        @Override
        public void call(Object... args) {
            values.offer(args);
        }
    });
    socket.connect();

    assertThat((Object[])values.take(), is(new Object[] {"hello client"}));
    assertThat((Object[])values.take(), is(new Object[] {"foo", "bar"}));
    socket.disconnect();
}

使用LinkedBlockingQueue使用API来阻塞直到得到结果，就像同步方式一样。并设置超时，以避免假设有太多时间等待结果。