我有一个对象x。我想将其复制为对象y,这样对y的更改不会修改x。我意识到复制从内置JavaScript对象派生的对象会导致额外的、不需要的财产。这不是问题,因为我正在复制我自己的一个文字构造对象。
如何正确克隆JavaScript对象?
我有一个对象x。我想将其复制为对象y,这样对y的更改不会修改x。我意识到复制从内置JavaScript对象派生的对象会导致额外的、不需要的财产。这不是问题,因为我正在复制我自己的一个文字构造对象。
如何正确克隆JavaScript对象?
当前回答
易于理解的
var restore = { name:'charlesi',
age:9}
var prev_data ={
name: 'charles'
age : 10
}
var temp = JSON.stringify(prev_data)
restore = JSON.parse(temp)
restore = {
name:'charlie',
age : 12}
输出prev_data:
{
name: 'charles'
age : 10
}
其他回答
A.Levy的答案几乎是完整的,这是我的一点贡献:有一种方法可以处理递归引用,请看下面这行
如果(this[attr]==this)copy[attr]=复制;
如果对象是XMLDOM元素,则必须改用cloneNode
if(this.cloneNode)返回this.clone节点(true);
受A.Levy的详尽研究和Calvin的原型设计方法启发,我提供了以下解决方案:
Object.prototype.clone = function() {
if(this.cloneNode) return this.cloneNode(true);
var copy = this instanceof Array ? [] : {};
for(var attr in this) {
if(typeof this[attr] == "function" || this[attr]==null || !this[attr].clone)
copy[attr] = this[attr];
else if(this[attr]==this) copy[attr] = copy;
else copy[attr] = this[attr].clone();
}
return copy;
}
Date.prototype.clone = function() {
var copy = new Date();
copy.setTime(this.getTime());
return copy;
}
Number.prototype.clone =
Boolean.prototype.clone =
String.prototype.clone = function() {
return this;
}
另请参见答案中的Andy Burke注释。
我已经编写了自己的实现。不确定它是否算作更好的解决方案:
/*
a function for deep cloning objects that contains other nested objects and circular structures.
objects are stored in a 3D array, according to their length (number of properties) and their depth in the original object.
index (z)
|
|
|
|
|
| depth (x)
|_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
/_/_/_/_/_/_/...../
/................./
/..... /
/ /
/------------------
object length (y) /
*/
实施情况如下:
function deepClone(obj) {
var depth = -1;
var arr = [];
return clone(obj, arr, depth);
}
/**
*
* @param obj source object
* @param arr 3D array to store the references to objects
* @param depth depth of the current object relative to the passed 'obj'
* @returns {*}
*/
function clone(obj, arr, depth){
if (typeof obj !== "object") {
return obj;
}
var length = Object.keys(obj).length; // native method to get the number of properties in 'obj'
var result = Object.create(Object.getPrototypeOf(obj)); // inherit the prototype of the original object
if(result instanceof Array){
result.length = length;
}
depth++; // depth is increased because we entered an object here
arr[depth] = []; // this is the x-axis, each index here is the depth
arr[depth][length] = []; // this is the y-axis, each index is the length of the object (aka number of props)
// start the depth at current and go down, cyclic structures won't form on depths more than the current one
for(var x = depth; x >= 0; x--){
// loop only if the array at this depth and length already have elements
if(arr[x][length]){
for(var index = 0; index < arr[x][length].length; index++){
if(obj === arr[x][length][index]){
return obj;
}
}
}
}
arr[depth][length].push(obj); // store the object in the array at the current depth and length
for (var prop in obj) {
if (obj.hasOwnProperty(prop)) result[prop] = clone(obj[prop], arr, depth);
}
return result;
}
Jan Turo的上述答案非常接近,由于兼容性问题,可能是在浏览器中使用的最佳选择,但这可能会导致一些奇怪的枚举问题。例如,执行:
for ( var i in someArray ) { ... }
在遍历数组元素后,将clone()方法赋给i。下面是一个避免枚举并适用于node.js的改编:
Object.defineProperty( Object.prototype, "clone", {
value: function() {
if ( this.cloneNode )
{
return this.cloneNode( true );
}
var copy = this instanceof Array ? [] : {};
for( var attr in this )
{
if ( typeof this[ attr ] == "function" || this[ attr ] == null || !this[ attr ].clone )
{
copy[ attr ] = this[ attr ];
}
else if ( this[ attr ] == this )
{
copy[ attr ] = copy;
}
else
{
copy[ attr ] = this[ attr ].clone();
}
}
return copy;
}
});
Object.defineProperty( Date.prototype, "clone", {
value: function() {
var copy = new Date();
copy.setTime( this.getTime() );
return copy;
}
});
Object.defineProperty( Number.prototype, "clone", { value: function() { return this; } } );
Object.defineProperty( Boolean.prototype, "clone", { value: function() { return this; } } );
Object.defineProperty( String.prototype, "clone", { value: function() { return this; } } );
这避免了使clone()方法可枚举,因为defineProperty()默认为false。
对于深度复制和克隆,JSON.stringify然后JSON.parse对象:
obj = { a: 0 , b: { c: 0}};
let deepClone = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(obj));
obj.a = 5;
obj.b.c = 5;
console.log(JSON.stringify(deepClone)); // { a: 0, b: { c: 0}}
在我的代码中,我经常定义一个函数(_)来处理副本,这样我就可以将值传递给函数。此代码创建一个深度副本,但保持继承。它还跟踪子副本,以便无需无限循环即可复制自引用对象。请随意使用。
这可能不是最优雅的,但它还没有让我失望。
_ = function(oReferance) {
var aReferances = new Array();
var getPrototypeOf = function(oObject) {
if(typeof(Object.getPrototypeOf)!=="undefined") return Object.getPrototypeOf(oObject);
var oTest = new Object();
if(typeof(oObject.__proto__)!=="undefined"&&typeof(oTest.__proto__)!=="undefined"&&oTest.__proto__===Object.prototype) return oObject.__proto__;
if(typeof(oObject.constructor)!=="undefined"&&typeof(oTest.constructor)!=="undefined"&&oTest.constructor===Object&&typeof(oObject.constructor.prototype)!=="undefined") return oObject.constructor.prototype;
return Object.prototype;
};
var recursiveCopy = function(oSource) {
if(typeof(oSource)!=="object") return oSource;
if(oSource===null) return null;
for(var i=0;i<aReferances.length;i++) if(aReferances[i][0]===oSource) return aReferances[i][1];
var Copy = new Function();
Copy.prototype = getPrototypeOf(oSource);
var oCopy = new Copy();
aReferances.push([oSource,oCopy]);
for(sPropertyName in oSource) if(oSource.hasOwnProperty(sPropertyName)) oCopy[sPropertyName] = recursiveCopy(oSource[sPropertyName]);
return oCopy;
};
return recursiveCopy(oReferance);
};
// Examples:
Wigit = function(){};
Wigit.prototype.bInThePrototype = true;
A = new Wigit();
A.nCoolNumber = 7;
B = _(A);
B.nCoolNumber = 8; // A.nCoolNumber is still 7
B.bInThePrototype // true
B instanceof Wigit // true