你可以使用最新的订阅类来取消对Observable的订阅，代码不会那么乱。

我们可以用普通变量来做这个，但它会在每次新的订阅上覆盖上一次订阅，所以要避免这种情况，当你处理更多数量的可观察对象时，这种方法是非常有用的，以及像behaviour Subject和Subject这样的可观察对象类型

订阅

表示一个一次性资源，比如Observable的执行。订阅有一个重要的方法，即unsubscribe，它不接受参数，只处理订阅所持有的资源。

你可以用两种方式来使用它，

you can directly push the subscription to Subscription Array subscriptions:Subscription[] = []; ngOnInit(): void { this.subscription.push(this.dataService.getMessageTracker().subscribe((param: any) => { //... })); this.subscription.push(this.dataService.getFileTracker().subscribe((param: any) => { //... })); } ngOnDestroy(){ // prevent memory leak when component destroyed this.subscriptions.forEach(s => s.unsubscribe()); } using add() of Subscription subscriptions = new Subscription(); this.subscriptions.add(subscribeOne); this.subscriptions.add(subscribeTwo); ngOnDestroy() { this.subscriptions.unsubscribe(); }

订阅可以保存子订阅并安全地取消所有订阅。这个方法处理可能的错误(例如，如果任何子订阅为空)。

希望这能有所帮助。：）

你不需要有一堆订阅和取消手动订阅。使用Subject和takeUntil组合来像boss一样处理订阅:

import { Subject } from "rxjs"
import { takeUntil } from "rxjs/operators"

@Component({
  moduleId: __moduleName,
  selector: "my-view",
  templateUrl: "../views/view-route.view.html"
})
export class ViewRouteComponent implements OnInit, OnDestroy {
  componentDestroyed$: Subject<boolean> = new Subject()

  constructor(private titleService: TitleService) {}

  ngOnInit() {
    this.titleService.emitter1$
      .pipe(takeUntil(this.componentDestroyed$))
      .subscribe((data: any) => { /* ... do something 1 */ })

    this.titleService.emitter2$
      .pipe(takeUntil(this.componentDestroyed$))
      .subscribe((data: any) => { /* ... do something 2 */ })

    //...

    this.titleService.emitterN$
      .pipe(takeUntil(this.componentDestroyed$))
      .subscribe((data: any) => { /* ... do something N */ })
  }

  ngOnDestroy() {
    this.componentDestroyed$.next(true)
    this.componentDestroyed$.complete()
  }
}

@acumartini在评论中提出了另一种方法，使用takeWhile而不是takeUntil。你可能更喜欢它，但要注意，这样你的Observable的执行就不会在组件的ngDestroy上被取消(例如，当你进行耗时的计算或等待来自服务器的数据时)。方法没有这个缺陷，它会导致立即取消请求。感谢@AlexChe在评论中的详细解释。

代码如下:

@Component({
  moduleId: __moduleName,
  selector: "my-view",
  templateUrl: "../views/view-route.view.html"
})
export class ViewRouteComponent implements OnInit, OnDestroy {
  alive: boolean = true

  constructor(private titleService: TitleService) {}

  ngOnInit() {
    this.titleService.emitter1$
      .pipe(takeWhile(() => this.alive))
      .subscribe((data: any) => { /* ... do something 1 */ })

    this.titleService.emitter2$
      .pipe(takeWhile(() => this.alive))
      .subscribe((data: any) => { /* ... do something 2 */ })

    // ...

    this.titleService.emitterN$
      .pipe(takeWhile(() => this.alive))
      .subscribe((data: any) => { /* ... do something N */ })
  }

  ngOnDestroy() {
    this.alive = false
  }
}

你可以使用最新的订阅类来取消对Observable的订阅，代码不会那么乱。

我们可以用普通变量来做这个，但它会在每次新的订阅上覆盖上一次订阅，所以要避免这种情况，当你处理更多数量的可观察对象时，这种方法是非常有用的，以及像behaviour Subject和Subject这样的可观察对象类型

订阅

表示一个一次性资源，比如Observable的执行。订阅有一个重要的方法，即unsubscribe，它不接受参数，只处理订阅所持有的资源。

你可以用两种方式来使用它，

you can directly push the subscription to Subscription Array subscriptions:Subscription[] = []; ngOnInit(): void { this.subscription.push(this.dataService.getMessageTracker().subscribe((param: any) => { //... })); this.subscription.push(this.dataService.getFileTracker().subscribe((param: any) => { //... })); } ngOnDestroy(){ // prevent memory leak when component destroyed this.subscriptions.forEach(s => s.unsubscribe()); } using add() of Subscription subscriptions = new Subscription(); this.subscriptions.add(subscribeOne); this.subscriptions.add(subscribeTwo); ngOnDestroy() { this.subscriptions.unsubscribe(); }

订阅可以保存子订阅并安全地取消所有订阅。这个方法处理可能的错误(例如，如果任何子订阅为空)。

希望这能有所帮助。：）

Angular组件中关于可观察对象取消订阅的一些最佳实践:

引用自《路由与导航》

When subscribing to an observable in a component, you almost always arrange to unsubscribe when the component is destroyed. There are a few exceptional observables where this is not necessary. The ActivatedRoute observables are among the exceptions. The ActivatedRoute and its observables are insulated from the Router itself. The Router destroys a routed component when it is no longer needed and the injected ActivatedRoute dies with it. Feel free to unsubscribe anyway. It is harmless and never a bad practice.

并在回复以下链接时:

我应该取消订阅Angular 2 Http observable吗? (2)是否有必要取消订阅Http方法创建的可观察对象? (3) RxJS:不要退订 (4)在Angular中取消订阅可观察对象的最简单方法 (5) RxJS退订的文档 (6)取消订阅服务是没有意义的，因为没有内存泄漏的机会 (7)我们需要取消订阅完成/错误输出的可观察对象吗? (8)关于http可观察对象的注释

我收集了一些Angular组件中关于可观察对象取消订阅的最佳实践，与大家分享:

http observable unsubscription is conditional and we should consider the effects of the 'subscribe callback' being run after the component is destroyed on a case by case basis. We know that angular unsubscribes and cleans the http observable itself (1), (2). While this is true from the perspective of resources it only tells half the story. Let's say we're talking about directly calling http from within a component, and the http response took longer than needed so the user closed the component. The subscribe() handler will still be called even if the component is closed and destroyed. This can have unwanted side effects and in the worse scenarios leave the application state broken. It can also cause exceptions if the code in the callback tries to call something that has just been disposed of. However at the same time occasionally they are desired. Like, let's say you're creating an email client and you trigger a sound when the email is done sending - well you'd still want that to occur even if the component is closed (8). No need to unsubscribe from observables that complete or error. However, there is no harm in doing so(7). Use AsyncPipe as much as possible because it automatically unsubscribes from the observable on component destruction. Unsubscribe from the ActivatedRoute observables like route.params if they are subscribed inside a nested (Added inside tpl with the component selector) or dynamic component as they may be subscribed many times as long as the parent/host component exists. No need to unsubscribe from them in other scenarios as mentioned in the quote above from Routing & Navigation docs. Unsubscribe from global observables shared between components that are exposed through an Angular service for example as they may be subscribed multiple times as long as the component is initialized. No need to unsubscribe from internal observables of an application scoped service since this service never get's destroyed, unless your entire application get's destroyed, there is no real reason to unsubscribe from it and there is no chance of memory leaks. (6). Note: Regarding scoped services, i.e component providers, they are destroyed when the component is destroyed. In this case, if we subscribe to any observable inside this provider, we should consider unsubscribing from it using the OnDestroy lifecycle hook which will be called when the service is destroyed, according to the docs. Use an abstract technique to avoid any code mess that may be resulted from unsubscriptions. You can manage your subscriptions with takeUntil (3) or you can use this npm package mentioned at (4) The easiest way to unsubscribe from Observables in Angular. Always unsubscribe from FormGroup observables like form.valueChanges and form.statusChanges Always unsubscribe from observables of Renderer2 service like renderer2.listen Unsubscribe from every observable else as a memory-leak guard step until Angular Docs explicitly tells us which observables are unnecessary to be unsubscribed (Check issue: (5) Documentation for RxJS Unsubscribing (Open)). Bonus: Always use the Angular ways to bind events like HostListener as angular cares well about removing the event listeners if needed and prevents any potential memory leak due to event bindings.

最后一个小技巧:如果你不知道一个可观察对象是否被自动取消订阅/完成，添加一个完整的回调到subscribe(…)，并检查它是否在组件销毁时被调用。

在我的情况下，我使用了@seanwright提出的解决方案的变化: https://github.com/NetanelBasal/ngx-take-until-destroy

这是ngx-rocket / starter-kit项目中使用的文件。你可以在这里访问until-destroyed.ts

组件看起来是这样的

/**
 * RxJS operator that unsubscribe from observables on destory.
 * Code forked from https://github.com/NetanelBasal/ngx-take-until-destroy
 *
 * IMPORTANT: Add the `untilDestroyed` operator as the last one to
 * prevent leaks with intermediate observables in the
 * operator chain.
 *
 * @param instance The parent Angular component or object instance.
 * @param destroyMethodName The method to hook on (default: 'ngOnDestroy').
 */
import { untilDestroyed } from '../../core/until-destroyed';

@Component({
  selector: 'app-example',
  templateUrl: './example.component.html'
})
export class ExampleComponent implements OnInit, OnDestroy {

  ngOnInit() {
    interval(1000)
        .pipe(untilDestroyed(this))
        .subscribe(val => console.log(val));

    // ...
  }


  // This method must be present, even if empty.
  ngOnDestroy() {
    // To protect you, an error will be thrown if it doesn't exist.
  }
}

Angular 2官方文档提供了一个关于何时退订以及何时可以安全忽略的解释。看看这个链接:

https://angular.io/docs/ts/latest/cookbook/component-communication.html !# bidirectional-service

寻找标题为“父母和孩子通过服务通信”的段落，然后是蓝色方框:

注意，当AstronautComponent被销毁时，我们捕获了订阅并取消了订阅。这是一个内存泄漏保护步骤。在这个应用程序中没有实际的风险，因为AstronautComponent的生命周期与应用程序本身的生命周期相同。在更复杂的应用程序中，这并不总是正确的。 我们没有将这个守卫添加到MissionControlComponent中，因为作为父组件，它控制着MissionService的生命周期。

我希望这对你有所帮助。