我有一个Java main类，在这个类中，我启动一个新线程，在main中，它等待线程死亡。在某个时刻，我从线程抛出运行时异常，但我无法捕获从主类中的线程抛出的异常。
代码如下:
public class Test extends Thread
{
public static void main(String[] args) throws InterruptedException
{
Test t = new Test();
try
{
t.start();
t.join();
}
catch(RuntimeException e)
{
System.out.println("** RuntimeException from main");
}
System.out.println("Main stoped");
}
@Override
public void run()
{
try
{
while(true)
{
System.out.println("** Started");
sleep(2000);
throw new RuntimeException("exception from thread");
}
}
catch (RuntimeException e)
{
System.out.println("** RuntimeException from thread");
throw e;
}
catch (InterruptedException e)
{
}
}
}
有人知道为什么吗?
最有可能的;
您不需要将异常从一个线程传递到另一个线程。
如果你想处理异常，只需在抛出异常的线程中处理即可。
在本例中，主线程不需要从后台线程等待，这实际上意味着您根本不需要后台线程。
但是，让我们假设您确实需要处理来自子线程的异常。我将像这样使用ExecutorService:
ExecutorService executor = Executors.newSingleThreadExecutor();
Future<Void> future = executor.submit(new Callable<Void>() {
@Override
public Void call() throws Exception {
System.out.println("** Started");
Thread.sleep(2000);
throw new IllegalStateException("exception from thread");
}
});
try {
future.get(); // raises ExecutionException for any uncaught exception in child
} catch (ExecutionException e) {
System.out.println("** RuntimeException from thread ");
e.getCause().printStackTrace(System.out);
}
executor.shutdown();
System.out.println("** Main stopped");
打印
** Started
** RuntimeException from thread
java.lang.IllegalStateException: exception from thread
at Main$1.call(Main.java:11)
at Main$1.call(Main.java:6)
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:303)
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:138)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:886)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:908)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662)
** Main stopped
AtomicReference也是一个将错误传递给主线程的解决方案。与Dan Cruz的方法相同。
AtomicReference<Throwable> errorReference = new AtomicReference<>();
Thread thread = new Thread() {
public void run() {
throw new RuntimeException("TEST EXCEPTION");
}
};
thread.setUncaughtExceptionHandler((th, ex) -> {
errorReference.set(ex);
});
thread.start();
thread.join();
Throwable newThreadError= errorReference.get();
if (newThreadError!= null) {
throw newThreadError;
}
唯一的变化是你可以使用AtomicReference而不是创建一个volatile变量，它在幕后做了同样的事情。
如果你实现Thread。在启动线程的类UncaughtExceptionHandler中，你可以设置并重新抛出异常:
public final class ThreadStarter implements Thread.UncaughtExceptionHandler{
private volatile Throwable initException;
public void doSomeInit(){
Thread t = new Thread(){
@Override
public void run() {
throw new RuntimeException("UNCAUGHT");
}
};
t.setUncaughtExceptionHandler(this);
t.start();
t.join();
if (initException != null){
throw new RuntimeException(initException);
}
}
@Override
public void uncaughtException(Thread t, Throwable e) {
initException = e;
}
}
这将导致以下输出:
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.RuntimeException: java.lang.RuntimeException: UNCAUGHT
at com.gs.gss.ccsp.enrichments.ThreadStarter.doSomeInit(ThreadStarter.java:24)
at com.gs.gss.ccsp.enrichments.ThreadStarter.main(ThreadStarter.java:38)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
at com.intellij.rt.execution.application.AppMain.main(AppMain.java:120)
Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: UNCAUGHT
at com.gs.gss.ccsp.enrichments.ThreadStarter$1.run(ThreadStarter.java:15)
