父组件

 function Parent() {
        const [value, setValue] = React.useState("");

        function handleChange(newValue) {
          setValue(newValue);
        }

        // We pass a callback to Child
        return <Child value={value} onChange={handleChange} />;
    }

子组件

    function Child(props) {
         function handleChange(event) {
             // Here, we invoke the callback with the new value
             props.onChange(event.target.value);
         }
  
         return <input value={props.value} onChange={handleChange} />
    }

我想感谢得到最多赞的回答，因为他给了我自己的问题的想法，基本上是用箭头函数和从子组件传递参数的变化:

 class Parent extends React.Component {
  constructor(props) {
    super(props)
    // without bind, replaced by arrow func below
  }

  handler = (val) => {
    this.setState({
      someVar: val
    })
  }

  render() {
    return <Child handler = {this.handler} />
  }
}

class Child extends React.Component {
  render() {
    return <Button onClick = {() => this.props.handler('the passing value')}/ >
  }
}

希望它能帮助到别人。

当您需要在子节点和父节点之间进行任何级别的通信时，最好利用上下文。在父组件中定义可以被子组件调用的上下文，例如:

在父组件中，在你的案例中，组件3，

static childContextTypes = {
    parentMethod: React.PropTypes.func.isRequired
};

getChildContext() {
    return {
        parentMethod: (parameter_from_child) => this.parentMethod(parameter_from_child)
    };
}

parentMethod(parameter_from_child){
    // Update the state with parameter_from_child
}

现在在子组件中(在你的例子中是组件5)，只需告诉这个组件它想要使用它的父组件的上下文。

static contextTypes = {
    parentMethod: React.PropTypes.func.isRequired
};

render() {
    return(
        <TouchableHighlight
            onPress = {() => this.context.parentMethod(new_state_value)}
            underlayColor='gray' >

            <Text> update state in parent component </Text>

        </TouchableHighlight>
)}

您可以在这个GitHub存储库中找到Demo项目。

<Footer 
  action={()=>this.setState({showChart: true})}
/>

<footer className="row">
    <button type="button" onClick={this.props.action}>Edit</button>
  {console.log(this.props)}
</footer>

Try this example to write inline setState, it avoids creating another function.

我喜欢关于传递函数的答案。这是一个非常方便的技巧。

On the flip side you can also achieve this using pub/sub or using a variant, a dispatcher, as Flux does. The theory is super simple. Have component 5 dispatch a message which component 3 is listening for. Component 3 then updates its state which triggers the re-render. This requires stateful components, which, depending on your viewpoint, may or may not be an anti-pattern. I'm against them personally and would rather that something else is listening for dispatches and changes state from the very top-down (Redux does this, but it adds additional terminology).

import { Dispatcher } from 'flux'
import { Component } from 'React'

const dispatcher = new Dispatcher()

// Component 3
// Some methods, such as constructor, omitted for brevity
class StatefulParent extends Component {
  state = {
    text: 'foo'
  } 

  componentDidMount() {
    dispatcher.register( dispatch => {
      if ( dispatch.type === 'change' ) {
        this.setState({ text: 'bar' })
      }
    }
  }

  render() {
    return <h1>{ this.state.text }</h1>
  }
}

// Click handler
const onClick = event => {
  dispatcher.dispatch({
    type: 'change'
  })
}

// Component 5 in your example
const StatelessChild = props => {
  return <button onClick={ onClick }>Click me</button> 
}

使用Flux的调度程序捆绑非常简单。它只是简单地注册回调，并在任何分派发生时调用它们，传递分派上的内容(在上面的简洁示例中，分派没有有效负载，只有一个消息id)。如果对您更有意义的话，您可以很容易地将其调整为传统的pub/sub(例如，从事件中使用EventEmitter或其他版本)。

之前给出的大多数答案都是针对React的。基于组件的设计。如果你在最近的React库升级中使用useState，那么遵循这个答案。