我用一个公式做了一个简单的测试，X-(X+1)=-1，我在Safari、Opera和Firefox(在OS X上测试)上可以得到的X的最大值是9e15。下面是我用于测试的代码:

javascript: alert(9e15-(9e15+1));

>= ES6：

Number.MIN_SAFE_INTEGER;
Number.MAX_SAFE_INTEGER;

< = ES5

参考文献:

Number.MAX_VALUE;
Number.MIN_VALUE;

console.log (MIN_VALUE, Number.MIN_VALUE); console.log (MAX_VALUE, Number.MAX_VALUE); console.log (MIN_SAFE_INTEGER, Number.MIN_SAFE_INTEGER);/ / ES6 console.log (MAX_SAFE_INTEGER, Number.MAX_SAFE_INTEGER);/ / ES6

我这样写:

var max_int = 0x20000000000000;
var min_int = -0x20000000000000;
(max_int + 1) === 0x20000000000000;  //true
(max_int - 1) < 0x20000000000000;    //true

int32也是一样

var max_int32 =  0x80000000;
var min_int32 = -0x80000000;

其他人可能已经给出了一般的答案，但我认为给出一个快速确定它的方法会是一个好主意:

for (var x = 2; x + 1 !== x; x *= 2);
console.log(x);

这给了我9007199254740992在Chrome 30不到一毫秒。

它将测试2的幂，以找出当“加”1时，哪一个等于他自己。

让我们来看看源头

描述

The MAX_SAFE_INTEGER constant has a value of 9007199254740991 (9,007,199,254,740,991 or ~9 quadrillion). The reasoning behind that number is that JavaScript uses double-precision floating-point format numbers as specified in IEEE 754 and can only safely represent numbers between -(2^53 - 1) and 2^53 - 1. Safe in this context refers to the ability to represent integers exactly and to correctly compare them. For example, Number.MAX_SAFE_INTEGER + 1 === Number.MAX_SAFE_INTEGER + 2 will evaluate to true, which is mathematically incorrect. See Number.isSafeInteger() for more information. Because MAX_SAFE_INTEGER is a static property of Number, you always use it as Number.MAX_SAFE_INTEGER, rather than as a property of a Number object you created.

浏览器兼容性

253 == 9 007 199 254 740 992。这是因为数字存储为52位尾数中的浮点数。

最小值为-253。

这使得一些有趣的事情发生了

Math.pow(2, 53) == Math.pow(2, 53) + 1
>> true

也可能是危险的:)

var MAX_INT = Math.pow(2, 53); // 9 007 199 254 740 992
for (var i = MAX_INT; i < MAX_INT + 2; ++i) {
    // infinite loop
}

进一步阅读:http://blog.vjeux.com/2010/javascript/javascript-max_int-number-limits.html