不幸的是，在这种情况下，如果不使用forEach会更好。而是使用一个常规的for循环，它现在将完全按照您的预期工作。

var array = [1, 2, 3];
for (var i = 0; i < array.length; i++) {
  if (array[i] === 1){
    break;
  }
}

如果您想使用Dean Edward的建议并抛出StopIteration错误以跳出循环而不必捕获错误，则可以使用以下函数（最初来自此处）：

// Use a closure to prevent the global namespace from be polluted.
(function() {
  // Define StopIteration as part of the global scope if it
  // isn't already defined.
  if(typeof StopIteration == "undefined") {
    StopIteration = new Error("StopIteration");
  }

  // The original version of Array.prototype.forEach.
  var oldForEach = Array.prototype.forEach;

  // If forEach actually exists, define forEach so you can
  // break out of it by throwing StopIteration.  Allow
  // other errors will be thrown as normal.
  if(oldForEach) {
    Array.prototype.forEach = function() {
      try {
        oldForEach.apply(this, [].slice.call(arguments, 0));
      }
      catch(e) {
        if(e !== StopIteration) {
          throw e;
        }
      }
    };
  }
})();

上述代码将使您能够运行以下代码，而无需执行自己的try-catch子句：

// Show the contents until you get to "2".
[0,1,2,3,4].forEach(function(val) {
  if(val == 2)
    throw StopIteration;
  alert(val);
});

需要记住的一点是，如果Array.prototype.forEach函数已经存在，则只会更新它。如果它还不存在，它将不会修改它。

您可以创建forEach的变体，该变体允许break、continue、return甚至async/await：（用TypeScript编写的示例）

export type LoopControlOp = "break" | "continue" | ["return", any];
export type LoopFunc<T> = (value: T, index: number, array: T[])=>LoopControlOp;

Array.prototype.ForEach = function ForEach<T>(this: T[], func: LoopFunc<T>) {
    for (let i = 0; i < this.length; i++) {
        const controlOp = func(this[i], i, this);
        if (controlOp == "break") break;
        if (controlOp == "continue") continue;
        if (controlOp instanceof Array) return controlOp[1];
    }
};

// this variant lets you use async/await in the loop-func, with the loop "awaiting" for each entry
Array.prototype.ForEachAsync = async function ForEachAsync<T>(this: T[], func: LoopFunc<T>) {
    for (let i = 0; i < this.length; i++) {
        const controlOp = await func(this[i], i, this);
        if (controlOp == "break") break;
        if (controlOp == "continue") continue;
        if (controlOp instanceof Array) return controlOp[1];
    }
};

用法：

function GetCoffee() {
    const cancelReason = peopleOnStreet.ForEach((person, index)=> {
        if (index == 0) return "continue";
        if (person.type == "friend") return "break";
        if (person.type == "boss") return ["return", "nevermind"];
    });
    if (cancelReason) console.log("Coffee canceled because: " + cancelReason);
}

在其他网站上找到此解决方案。您可以在try/catch场景中包装forEach。

if(typeof StopIteration == "undefined") {
 StopIteration = new Error("StopIteration");
}

try {
  [1,2,3].forEach(function(el){
    alert(el);
    if(el === 1) throw StopIteration;
  });
} catch(error) { if(error != StopIteration) throw error; }

此处提供更多详细信息：http://dean.edwards.name/weblog/2006/07/enum/

const Book = {"Titles":[                          
    {"Book3" : "BULLETIN 3"},
    {"Book1" : "BULLETIN 1"},
    {"Book2" : "BULLETIN 2"}    
]}

const findbystr = function(str) { 
    Book.Titles.forEach(function(data) { 
        if (typeof data[str] != 'undefined') {
            return data[str];
        } 
    }, str) 
}

book = findbystr('Book1');

console.log(book);

我提出的另一个概念是：

函数forEach（数组，cb）{var shouldBreak；函数_break（）｛shouldBreak=true；｝for（var i=0，bound=array.length；i<bound；++i）{if（shouldBreak）｛break；｝cb（array[i]，i，array，_break）；}}//用途forEach（[‘a’，‘b’，‘c’，‘d’，‘e’，‘f’]，函数（char，i，array，_break）{console.log（i，char）；如果（i===2）｛_break（）；｝});