使用反射

关于此主题的Microsoft文档。

using System;
using System.Collections;
using System.Collections.Generic;

var anonObj = new { Id = 1, Name = "Foo" };
var anonType = anonObj.GetType();

var listType = typeof(List<>);

// We know that List<> have only one generic argument, so we do this:
var contructed = listType.MakeGenericType(anonType);

// Create instance
var instance = Activator.CreateInstance(contructed);

// Using it
var list = (IList)instance;
list.Add(anonObj);

对于Dictionary<，>，您需要传递2个参数 例:dicType。MakeGenericType(type1, type2)

对于带有约束的泛型类型(其中T: struct)， 我们需要做更多的核实。查看微软文档来学习如何操作。

我猜

List<T> CreateEmptyGenericList<T>(T example) {
    return new List<T>();
}

void something() {
    var o = new { Id = 1, Name = "foo" };
    var emptyListOfAnonymousType = CreateEmptyGenericList(o);
}

将工作。

你也可以考虑这样写:

void something() {
    var String = string.Emtpy;
    var Integer = int.MinValue;
    var emptyListOfAnonymousType = CreateEmptyGenericList(new { Id = Integer, Name = String });
}

您可以创建一个动态列表。

List<dynamic> anons=new List<dynamic>();
foreach (Model model in models)
{
   var anon= new
   {
      Id = model.Id,
      Name=model.Name
   };
   anons.Add(anon);
}

"dynamic"由第一个添加的值初始化。

根据这个答案，我提出了两种可以完成任务的方法:

    /// <summary>
    /// Create a list of the given anonymous class. <paramref name="definition"/> isn't called, it is only used
    /// for the needed type inference. This overload is for when you don't have an instance of the anon class
    /// and don't want to make one to make the list.
    /// </summary>
    /// <typeparam name="T"></typeparam>
    /// <param name="definition"></param>
    /// <returns></returns>
#pragma warning disable RECS0154 // Parameter is never used
    public static List<T> CreateListOfAnonType<T>(Func<T> definition)
#pragma warning restore RECS0154 // Parameter is never used
    {
        return new List<T>();
    }
    /// <summary>
    /// Create a list of the given anonymous class. <paramref name="definition"/> isn't added to the list, it is
    /// only used for the needed type inference. This overload is for when you do have an instance of the anon
    /// class and don't want the compiler to waste time making a temp class to define the type.
    /// </summary>
    /// <typeparam name="T"></typeparam>
    /// <param name="definition"></param>
    /// <returns></returns>
#pragma warning disable RECS0154 // Parameter is never used
    public static List<T> CreateListOfAnonType<T>(T definition)
#pragma warning restore RECS0154 // Parameter is never used
    {
        return new List<T>();
    }

你可以使用这些方法

var emptyList = CreateListOfAnonType(()=>new { Id = default(int), Name = default(string) });
//or
var existingAnonInstance = new { Id = 59, Name = "Joe" };
var otherEmptyList = CreateListOfAnonType(existingAnonInstance);

这个答案也有类似的想法，但直到我创建了这些方法之后我才发现它。

这是一个老问题，但我想我会把我的c# 6的答案。我经常需要设置容易在代码中以元组列表的形式输入的测试数据。使用几个扩展函数，就可以获得这种漂亮、紧凑的格式，而不必在每个条目上重复名称。

var people= new List<Tuple<int, int, string>>() {
    {1, 11, "Adam"},
    {2, 22, "Bill"},
    {3, 33, "Carol"}
}.Select(t => new { Id = t.Item1, Age = t.Item2, Name = t.Item3 });

这将给出一个IEnumerable -如果你想要一个可以添加的列表，那么只需添加ToList()。

魔力来自于元组的自定义扩展Add方法，如https://stackoverflow.com/a/27455822/4536527所述。

public static class TupleListExtensions    {
    public static void Add<T1, T2>(this IList<Tuple<T1, T2>> list,
            T1 item1, T2 item2)       {
        list.Add(Tuple.Create(item1, item2));
    }

    public static void Add<T1, T2, T3>(this IList<Tuple<T1, T2, T3>> list,
            T1 item1, T2 item2, T3 item3) {
        list.Add(Tuple.Create(item1, item2, item3));
    }

// and so on...

}

我唯一不喜欢的是类型与名称分离，但如果您真的不想创建一个新类，那么这种方法仍然可以让您拥有可读的数据。

我检查了几个答案的IL。这段代码有效地提供了一个空列表:

    using System.Linq;
    …
    var list = new[]{new{Id = default(int), Name = default(string)}}.Skip(1).ToList();