这是我想出的解决填字游戏的办法。我想这是最“python”的做事方式:

from itertools import combinations
from itertools import izip
from math import fabs

def isAllowedStep(current,step,length,doubleLength):
            # for step == length -1 not to be 0 => trivial solutions are not allowed
    return length > 1 and \
           current + step < doubleLength and current - step > 0 and \
           ( step == 1 or step == -1 or step <= length+1 or step >= length - 1)

def getPairwiseList(someList):
    iterableList = iter(someList)
    return izip(iterableList, iterableList)

def isCombinationAllowed(combination,length,doubleLength):

    for (first,second) in  getPairwiseList(combination):
        _, firstCoordinate = first
        _, secondCoordinate = second
        if not isAllowedStep(firstCoordinate, fabs(secondCoordinate-firstCoordinate),length,doubleLength):
            return False
    return True

def extractSolution(combinations):
    return ["".join([x[0] for x in combinationTuple]) for combinationTuple in combinations]


length = 4
text = tuple("".join("fxie amlo ewbx astu".split()))
textIndices = tuple(range(len(text)))
coordinates = zip(text,textIndices)

validCombinations = [combination for combination in combinations(coordinates,length) if isCombinationAllowed(combination,length,length*length)]
solution = extractSolution(validCombinations)

我善意地建议你不要将这部分用于所有可能的匹配，但它实际上提供了一种检查你生成的单词是否真的构成有效单词的可能性:

import mechanize
def checkWord(word):
    url = "https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/search?filter=dictionary&query="+word
    br = mechanize.Browser()
    br.set_handle_robots(False)
    response = br.open(url)
    text = response.read()
    return "no exact matches"  not in text.lower()

print [valid for valid in solution[:10] if checkWord(valid)]

给定一个有N行M列的Boggle板，让我们假设如下:

N*M基本上大于可能单词的数量 N*M基本上大于可能的最长单词

在这些假设下，该解的复杂度为O(N*M)。

我认为比较这个示例板的运行时间在很多方面都没有重点，但是为了完整性，在我的现代MacBook Pro上，这个解决方案在0.2秒内完成。

这个解决方案将为语料库中的每个单词找到所有可能的路径。

#!/usr/bin/env ruby
# Example usage: ./boggle-solver --board "fxie amlo ewbx astu"

autoload :Matrix, 'matrix'
autoload :OptionParser, 'optparse'

DEFAULT_CORPUS_PATH = '/usr/share/dict/words'.freeze

# Functions

def filter_corpus(matrix, corpus, min_word_length)
  board_char_counts = Hash.new(0)
  matrix.each { |c| board_char_counts[c] += 1 }

  max_word_length = matrix.row_count * matrix.column_count
  boggleable_regex = /^[#{board_char_counts.keys.reduce(:+)}]{#{min_word_length},#{max_word_length}}$/
  corpus.select{ |w| w.match boggleable_regex }.select do |w|
    word_char_counts = Hash.new(0)
    w.each_char { |c| word_char_counts[c] += 1 }
    word_char_counts.all? { |c, count| board_char_counts[c] >= count }
  end
end

def neighbors(point, matrix)
  i, j = point
  ([i-1, 0].max .. [i+1, matrix.row_count-1].min).inject([]) do |r, new_i|
    ([j-1, 0].max .. [j+1, matrix.column_count-1].min).inject(r) do |r, new_j|
      neighbor = [new_i, new_j]
      neighbor.eql?(point) ? r : r << neighbor
    end
  end
end

def expand_path(path, word, matrix)
  return [path] if path.length == word.length

  next_char = word[path.length]
  viable_neighbors = neighbors(path[-1], matrix).select do |point|
    !path.include?(point) && matrix.element(*point).eql?(next_char)
  end

  viable_neighbors.inject([]) do |result, point|
    result + expand_path(path.dup << point, word, matrix)
  end
end

def find_paths(word, matrix)
  result = []
  matrix.each_with_index do |c, i, j|
    result += expand_path([[i, j]], word, matrix) if c.eql?(word[0])
  end
  result
end

def solve(matrix, corpus, min_word_length: 3)
  boggleable_corpus = filter_corpus(matrix, corpus, min_word_length)
  boggleable_corpus.inject({}) do |result, w|
    paths = find_paths(w, matrix)
    result[w] = paths unless paths.empty?
    result
  end
end

# Script

options = { corpus_path: DEFAULT_CORPUS_PATH }
option_parser = OptionParser.new do |opts|
  opts.banner = 'Usage: boggle-solver --board <value> [--corpus <value>]'

  opts.on('--board BOARD', String, 'The board (e.g. "fxi aml ewb ast")') do |b|
    options[:board] = b
  end

  opts.on('--corpus CORPUS_PATH', String, 'Corpus file path') do |c|
    options[:corpus_path] = c
  end

  opts.on_tail('-h', '--help', 'Shows usage') do
    STDOUT.puts opts
    exit
  end
end
option_parser.parse!

unless options[:board]
  STDERR.puts option_parser
  exit false
end

unless File.file? options[:corpus_path]
  STDERR.puts "No corpus exists - #{options[:corpus_path]}"
  exit false
end

rows = options[:board].downcase.scan(/\S+/).map{ |row| row.scan(/./) }

raw_corpus = File.readlines(options[:corpus_path])
corpus = raw_corpus.map{ |w| w.downcase.rstrip }.uniq.sort

solution = solve(Matrix.rows(rows), corpus)
solution.each_pair do |w, paths|
  STDOUT.puts w
  paths.each do |path|
    STDOUT.puts "\t" + path.map{ |point| point.inspect }.join(', ')
  end
end
STDOUT.puts "TOTAL: #{solution.count}"

下面是使用NLTK工具包中的预定义单词的解决方案 NLTK有NLTK。语料库包，我们有一个叫做单词的包，它包含超过20万个英语单词，你可以简单地把它们都用到你的程序中。

一旦创建你的矩阵转换成一个字符数组，并执行这段代码

import nltk
from nltk.corpus import words
from collections import Counter

def possibleWords(input, charSet):
    for word in input:
        dict = Counter(word)
        flag = 1
        for key in dict.keys():
            if key not in charSet:
                flag = 0
        if flag == 1 and len(word)>5: #its depends if you want only length more than 5 use this otherwise remove that one. 
            print(word)


nltk.download('words')
word_list = words.words()
# prints 236736
print(len(word_list))
charSet = ['h', 'e', 'l', 'o', 'n', 'v', 't']
possibleWords(word_list, charSet)

输出:

eleven
eleventh
elevon
entente
entone
ethene
ethenol
evolve
evolvent
hellhole
helvell
hooven
letten
looten
nettle
nonene
nonent
nonlevel
notelet
novelet
novelette
novene
teenet
teethe
teevee
telethon
tellee
tenent
tentlet
theelol
toetoe
tonlet
toothlet
tootle
tottle
vellon
velvet
velveteen
venene
vennel
venthole
voeten
volent
volvelle
volvent
voteen

我希望你能得到它。

我知道我在派对上迟到了，但我已经实现了，作为编码练习，在几种编程语言(c++， Java, Go, c#， Python, Ruby, JavaScript, Julia, Lua, PHP, Perl)中使用了一个填字器，我认为有人可能会对这些感兴趣，所以我在这里留下了链接: https://github.com/AmokHuginnsson/boggle-solvers

最快的解决方案可能是将字典存储在一个trie中。然后，创建一个三元组队列(x, y, s)，其中队列中的每个元素对应于一个可以在网格中拼写的单词的前缀s，结束于位置(x, y)。初始化队列中有N x N个元素(其中N是网格的大小)，网格中的每个正方形都有一个元素。然后，算法进行如下:

While the queue is not empty:
  Dequeue a triple (x, y, s)
  For each square (x', y') with letter c adjacent to (x, y):
    If s+c is a word, output s+c
    If s+c is a prefix of a word, insert (x', y', s+c) into the queue

如果将字典存储在trie中，则可以在常数时间内测试s+c是否是单词或单词的前缀(前提是还在每个队列数据中保留一些额外的元数据，例如指向trie中当前节点的指针)，因此此算法的运行时间为O(可拼写的单词数量)。

[编辑]下面是我刚刚编写的Python实现:

#!/usr/bin/python

class TrieNode:
    def __init__(self, parent, value):
        self.parent = parent
        self.children = [None] * 26
        self.isWord = False
        if parent is not None:
            parent.children[ord(value) - 97] = self

def MakeTrie(dictfile):
    dict = open(dictfile)
    root = TrieNode(None, '')
    for word in dict:
        curNode = root
        for letter in word.lower():
            if 97 <= ord(letter) < 123:
                nextNode = curNode.children[ord(letter) - 97]
                if nextNode is None:
                    nextNode = TrieNode(curNode, letter)
                curNode = nextNode
        curNode.isWord = True
    return root

def BoggleWords(grid, dict):
    rows = len(grid)
    cols = len(grid[0])
    queue = []
    words = []
    for y in range(cols):
        for x in range(rows):
            c = grid[y][x]
            node = dict.children[ord(c) - 97]
            if node is not None:
                queue.append((x, y, c, node))
    while queue:
        x, y, s, node = queue[0]
        del queue[0]
        for dx, dy in ((1, 0), (1, -1), (0, -1), (-1, -1), (-1, 0), (-1, 1), (0, 1), (1, 1)):
            x2, y2 = x + dx, y + dy
            if 0 <= x2 < cols and 0 <= y2 < rows:
                s2 = s + grid[y2][x2]
                node2 = node.children[ord(grid[y2][x2]) - 97]
                if node2 is not None:
                    if node2.isWord:
                        words.append(s2)
                    queue.append((x2, y2, s2, node2))

    return words

使用示例:

d = MakeTrie('/usr/share/dict/words')
print(BoggleWords(['fxie','amlo','ewbx','astu'], d))

输出:

['fa', 'xi', 'ie', 'io', 'el', 'am', 'ax', 'ae', 'aw', 'mi', 'ma', 'me', 'lo', 'li', 'oe', 'ox', 'em', 'ea', 'ea', 'es', 'wa', 'we', 'wa', 'bo', 'bu', 'as', 'aw', 'ae', 'st', 'se', 'sa', 'tu', 'ut', 'fam', 'fae', 'imi', 'eli', 'elm', 'elb', 'ami', 'ama', 'ame', 'aes', 'awl', 'awa', 'awe', 'awa', 'mix', 'mim', 'mil', 'mam', 'max', 'mae', 'maw', 'mew', 'mem', 'mes', 'lob', 'lox', 'lei', 'leo', 'lie', 'lim', 'oil', 'olm', 'ewe', 'eme', 'wax', 'waf', 'wae', 'waw', 'wem', 'wea', 'wea', 'was', 'waw', 'wae', 'bob', 'blo', 'bub', 'but', 'ast', 'ase', 'asa', 'awl', 'awa', 'awe', 'awa', 'aes', 'swa', 'swa', 'sew', 'sea', 'sea', 'saw', 'tux', 'tub', 'tut', 'twa', 'twa', 'tst', 'utu', 'fama', 'fame', 'ixil', 'imam', 'amli', 'amil', 'ambo', 'axil', 'axle', 'mimi', 'mima', 'mime', 'milo', 'mile', 'mewl', 'mese', 'mesa', 'lolo', 'lobo', 'lima', 'lime', 'limb', 'lile', 'oime', 'oleo', 'olio', 'oboe', 'obol', 'emim', 'emil', 'east', 'ease', 'wame', 'wawa', 'wawa', 'weam', 'west', 'wese', 'wast', 'wase', 'wawa', 'wawa', 'boil', 'bolo', 'bole', 'bobo', 'blob', 'bleo', 'bubo', 'asem', 'stub', 'stut', 'swam', 'semi', 'seme', 'seam', 'seax', 'sasa', 'sawt', 'tutu', 'tuts', 'twae', 'twas', 'twae', 'ilima', 'amble', 'axile', 'awest', 'mamie', 'mambo', 'maxim', 'mease', 'mesem', 'limax', 'limes', 'limbo', 'limbu', 'obole', 'emesa', 'embox', 'awest', 'swami', 'famble', 'mimble', 'maxima', 'embolo', 'embole', 'wamble', 'semese', 'semble', 'sawbwa', 'sawbwa']

Notes: This program doesn't output 1-letter words, or filter by word length at all. That's easy to add but not really relevant to the problem. It also outputs some words multiple times if they can be spelled in multiple ways. If a given word can be spelled in many different ways (worst case: every letter in the grid is the same (e.g. 'A') and a word like 'aaaaaaaaaa' is in your dictionary), then the running time will get horribly exponential. Filtering out duplicates and sorting is trivial to due after the algorithm has finished.

你的搜索算法是否会随着搜索的继续而不断减少单词列表?

例如，在上面的搜索中，你的单词只能以13个字母开头(有效地减少了一半的开头字母)。

当你添加更多的字母排列时，它会进一步减少可用的单词集，减少必要的搜索。

我会从这里开始。