我试图使一个自定义授权属性在ASP。净的核心。在以前的版本中,可以重写bool AuthorizeCore(HttpContextBase httpContext)。但是这在AuthorizeAttribute中不再存在。
当前制作自定义AuthorizeAttribute的方法是什么?
我想要完成的:我正在头授权中接收会话ID。通过该ID,我将知道特定操作是否有效。
我试图使一个自定义授权属性在ASP。净的核心。在以前的版本中,可以重写bool AuthorizeCore(HttpContextBase httpContext)。但是这在AuthorizeAttribute中不再存在。
当前制作自定义AuthorizeAttribute的方法是什么?
我想要完成的:我正在头授权中接收会话ID。通过该ID,我将知道特定操作是否有效。
当前回答
基于Derek Greer伟大的答案,我用枚举来做。
下面是我的代码示例:
public enum PermissionItem
{
User,
Product,
Contact,
Review,
Client
}
public enum PermissionAction
{
Read,
Create,
}
public class AuthorizeAttribute : TypeFilterAttribute
{
public AuthorizeAttribute(PermissionItem item, PermissionAction action)
: base(typeof(AuthorizeActionFilter))
{
Arguments = new object[] { item, action };
}
}
public class AuthorizeActionFilter : IAuthorizationFilter
{
private readonly PermissionItem _item;
private readonly PermissionAction _action;
public AuthorizeActionFilter(PermissionItem item, PermissionAction action)
{
_item = item;
_action = action;
}
public void OnAuthorization(AuthorizationFilterContext context)
{
bool isAuthorized = MumboJumboFunction(context.HttpContext.User, _item, _action); // :)
if (!isAuthorized)
{
context.Result = new ForbidResult();
}
}
}
public class UserController : BaseController
{
private readonly DbContext _context;
public UserController( DbContext context) :
base()
{
_logger = logger;
}
[Authorize(PermissionItem.User, PermissionAction.Read)]
public async Task<IActionResult> Index()
{
return View(await _context.User.ToListAsync());
}
}
其他回答
什么? !
我决定再补充一个简单的答案。B/c我发现大多数答案都有点过度设计。也因为我需要一种授予授权的方法,而不仅仅是否认它。这里的大多数答案都提供了一种“加强”安全性的方法,但我想“放松”它。例如:“如果配置了某些应用程序设置,则允许匿名用户访问”。
public class MyAuthAttribute : Attribute, IAuthorizationFilter
{
public void OnAuthorization(AuthorizationFilterContext context)
{
//check access
if (CheckPermissions())
{
//all good, add optional code if you want. Or don't
}
else
{
//DENIED!
//return "ChallengeResult" to redirect to login page (for example)
context.Result = new ChallengeResult(CookieAuthenticationDefaults.AuthenticationScheme);
}
}
}
就是这样。不需要混淆“策略”,“声明”,“处理程序”和其他[哔]
用法:
// GET api/Get/5
[MyAuth]
public ActionResult<string> Get(int id)
{
return "blahblah";
}
这里很多人已经说过了,但是有了策略处理程序,你就可以在。net框架中使用旧方法实现的功能而言,你可以走得更远。
我在SO网站上快速写了一个答案:https://stackoverflow.com/a/61963465/7081176 对我来说,在制作了一些类后,它完美地工作了:
EditUserRequirement:
public class EditUserRequirement : IAuthorizationRequirement
{
public EditUserRequirement()
{
}
}
一个抽象处理程序,使我的生活更容易:
public abstract class AbstractRequirementHandler<T> : IAuthorizationHandler
where T : IAuthorizationRequirement
{
public async Task HandleAsync(AuthorizationHandlerContext context)
{
var pendingRequirements = context.PendingRequirements.ToList();
foreach (var requirement in pendingRequirements)
{
if (requirement is T typedRequirement)
{
await HandleRequirementAsync(context, typedRequirement);
}
}
}
protected abstract Task HandleRequirementAsync(AuthorizationHandlerContext context, T requirement);
}
抽象处理程序的实现:
public class EditUserRequirementHandler : AbstractRequirementHandler<EditUserRequirement>
{
protected override Task HandleRequirementAsync(AuthorizationHandlerContext context, EditUserRequirement requirement)
{
// If the user is owner of the resource, allow it.
if (IsOwner(context.User, g))
{
context.Succeed(requirement);
}
return Task.CompletedTask;
}
private static bool IsOwner(ClaimsPrincipal user, Guid userIdentifier)
{
return user.GetUserIdentifier() == userIdentifier;
}
}
注册我的处理程序和需求: 服务。AddSingleton < IAuthorizationHandler, EditUserRequirementHandler > ();
services.AddAuthorization(options =>
{
options.AddPolicy(Policies.Policies.EditUser, policy =>
{
policy.Requirements.Add(new EditUserRequirement());
});
});
然后使用我在Blazor的策略:
<AuthorizeView Policy="@Policies.EditUser" Resource="@id">
<NotAuthorized>
<Unauthorized />
</NotAuthorized>
<Authorized Context="Auth">
...
</Authorized>
</AuthorizeView>
我希望这对面临这个问题的人有用。
在写这篇文章时,我相信这可以用asp.net core 2及以上的iclaimstrtransform接口来完成。我刚刚实现了一个概念的证明,可以分享到这里。
public class PrivilegesToClaimsTransformer : IClaimsTransformation
{
private readonly IPrivilegeProvider privilegeProvider;
public const string DidItClaim = "http://foo.bar/privileges/resolved";
public PrivilegesToClaimsTransformer(IPrivilegeProvider privilegeProvider)
{
this.privilegeProvider = privilegeProvider;
}
public async Task<ClaimsPrincipal> TransformAsync(ClaimsPrincipal principal)
{
if (principal.Identity is ClaimsIdentity claimer)
{
if (claimer.HasClaim(DidItClaim, bool.TrueString))
{
return principal;
}
var privileges = await this.privilegeProvider.GetPrivileges( ... );
claimer.AddClaim(new Claim(DidItClaim, bool.TrueString));
foreach (var privilegeAsRole in privileges)
{
claimer.AddClaim(new Claim(ClaimTypes.Role /*"http://schemas.microsoft.com/ws/2008/06/identity/claims/role" */, privilegeAsRole));
}
}
return principal;
}
}
要在你的控制器中使用它,只需在你的方法中添加适当的[授权(角色="whatever")]。
[HttpGet]
[Route("poc")]
[Authorize(Roles = "plugh,blast")]
public JsonResult PocAuthorization()
{
var result = Json(new
{
when = DateTime.UtcNow,
});
result.StatusCode = (int)HttpStatusCode.OK;
return result;
}
在我们的例子中,每个请求都包含一个JWT的授权标头。这是原型,我相信下周我们会在我们的生产系统中做一些非常接近的东西。
未来的选民,在投票时,请考虑投票日期。到今天为止,这在我的机器上还能用。您可能需要在实现上进行更多的错误处理和日志记录。
下面的代码适合我在。net Core 5中使用
[AttributeUsage(AttributeTargets.Class | AttributeTargets.Method)]
public class AccessAuthorizationAttribute : AuthorizeAttribute, IAuthorizationFilter
{
public string Module { get; set; } //Permission string to get from controller
public AccessAuthorizationAttribute(string module)
{
Module = module;
}
public void OnAuthorization(AuthorizationFilterContext context)
{
//Validate if any permissions are passed when using attribute at controller or action level
if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(Module))
{
//Validation cannot take place without any permissions so returning unauthorized
context.Result = new UnauthorizedResult();
return;
}
if (hasAccess)
{
return;
}
context.Result = new UnauthorizedResult();
return;
}
}
ASP。Net Core团队将使用这里完整记录的新策略设计。新方法背后的基本思想是使用新的[Authorize]属性来指定一个“策略”(例如[Authorize(policy = "YouNeedToBe18ToDoThis")],其中策略在应用程序的Startup.cs中注册,以执行一些代码块(即确保用户在年龄为18岁或以上时有年龄声明)。
The policy design is a great addition to the framework and the ASP.Net Security Core team should be commended for its introduction. That said, it isn't well-suited for all cases. The shortcoming of this approach is that it fails to provide a convenient solution for the most common need of simply asserting that a given controller or action requires a given claim type. In the case where an application may have hundreds of discrete permissions governing CRUD operations on individual REST resources ("CanCreateOrder", "CanReadOrder", "CanUpdateOrder", "CanDeleteOrder", etc.), the new approach either requires repetitive one-to-one mappings between a policy name and a claim name (e.g. options.AddPolicy("CanUpdateOrder", policy => policy.RequireClaim(MyClaimTypes.Permission, "CanUpdateOrder));), or writing some code to perform these registrations at run time (e.g. read all claim types from a database and perform the aforementioned call in a loop). The problem with this approach for the majority of cases is that it's unnecessary overhead.
而ASP。Net Core Security团队建议永远不要创建自己的解决方案,在某些情况下,这可能是最谨慎的选择。
下面是一个实现,它使用IAuthorizationFilter提供了一种简单的方式来表达给定控制器或动作的索赔要求:
public class ClaimRequirementAttribute : TypeFilterAttribute
{
public ClaimRequirementAttribute(string claimType, string claimValue) : base(typeof(ClaimRequirementFilter))
{
Arguments = new object[] {new Claim(claimType, claimValue) };
}
}
public class ClaimRequirementFilter : IAuthorizationFilter
{
readonly Claim _claim;
public ClaimRequirementFilter(Claim claim)
{
_claim = claim;
}
public void OnAuthorization(AuthorizationFilterContext context)
{
var hasClaim = context.HttpContext.User.Claims.Any(c => c.Type == _claim.Type && c.Value == _claim.Value);
if (!hasClaim)
{
context.Result = new ForbidResult();
}
}
}
[Route("api/resource")]
public class MyController : Controller
{
[ClaimRequirement(MyClaimTypes.Permission, "CanReadResource")]
[HttpGet]
public IActionResult GetResource()
{
return Ok();
}
}