一个俗套的说法是:-

CallStatus.ts

enum Status
{
    PENDING_SCHEDULING,
    SCHEDULED,
    CANCELLED,
    COMPLETED,
    IN_PROGRESS,
    FAILED,
    POSTPONED
}

export = Status

Utils.ts

static getEnumString(enum:any, key:any):string
{
    return enum[enum[key]];
}

如何使用

Utils.getEnumString(Status, Status.COMPLETED); // = "COMPLETED"

@basarat的回答很棒。下面是一个你可以使用的简化但有点扩展的例子:

export type TMyEnumType = 'value1'|'value2';

export class MyEnumType {
    static VALUE1: TMyEnumType = 'value1';
    static VALUE2: TMyEnumType = 'value2';
}

console.log(MyEnumType.VALUE1); // 'value1'

const variable = MyEnumType.VALUE2; // it has the string value 'value2'

switch (variable) {
    case MyEnumType.VALUE1:
        // code...

    case MyEnumType.VALUE2:
        // code...
}

更新:TypeScript 3.4

你可以简单地使用const:

const AwesomeType = {
   Foo: "foo",
   Bar: "bar"
} as const;

打字稿2.1

这也可以用这种方式完成。希望它能帮助到一些人。

const AwesomeType = {
    Foo: "foo" as "foo",
    Bar: "bar" as "bar"
};

type AwesomeType = (typeof AwesomeType)[keyof typeof AwesomeType];

console.log(AwesomeType.Bar); // returns bar
console.log(AwesomeType.Foo); // returns foo

function doSth(awesometype: AwesomeType) {
    console.log(awesometype);
}

doSth("foo") // return foo
doSth("bar") // returns bar
doSth(AwesomeType.Bar) // returns bar
doSth(AwesomeType.Foo) // returns foo
doSth('error') // does not compile

TypeScript < 2.4

/** Utility function to create a K:V from a list of strings */
function strEnum<T extends string>(o: Array<T>): {[K in T]: K} {
  return o.reduce((res, key) => {
    res[key] = key;
    return res;
  }, Object.create(null));
}

/**
  * Sample create a string enum
  */

/** Create a K:V */
const Direction = strEnum([
  'North',
  'South',
  'East',
  'West'
])
/** Create a Type */
type Direction = keyof typeof Direction;

/** 
  * Sample using a string enum
  */
let sample: Direction;

sample = Direction.North; // Okay
sample = 'North'; // Okay
sample = 'AnythingElse'; // ERROR!

从https://basarat.gitbooks.io/typescript/docs/types/literal-types.html

到源代码链接，你可以找到更多更简单的方法来实现字符串文字类型

打印稿0.9.0.1

enum e{
    hello = 1,
    somestr = 'world'
};

alert(e[1] + ' ' + e.somestr);

打印稿操场

我也有同样的问题，然后想出了一个很好用的函数:

每个条目的键和值都是字符串，并且相同。 每个条目的值都是从键派生出来的。(即。“不要重复你自己”，不像字符串值的常规枚举) TypeScript类型成熟且正确。(防止拼写错误) 还有一种简单的方法可以让TS自动完成您的选项。(如。打字MyEnum。，并立即看到可用的选项) 还有其他一些优点。(见答案底部)

效用函数:

export function createStringEnum<T extends {[key: string]: 1}>(keysObj: T) {
    const optionsObj = {} as {
        [K in keyof T]: keyof T
        // alternative; gives narrower type for MyEnum.XXX
        //[K in keyof T]: K
    };
    const keys = Object.keys(keysObj) as Array<keyof T>;
    const values = keys; // could also check for string value-overrides on keysObj
    for (const key of keys) {
        optionsObj[key] = key;
    }
    return [optionsObj, values] as const;
}

用法:

// if the "Fruit_values" var isn't useful to you, just omit it
export const [Fruit, Fruit_values] = createStringEnum({
    apple: 1,
    pear: 1,
});
export type Fruit = keyof typeof Fruit; // "apple" | "pear"
//export type Fruit = typeof Fruit_values[number]; // alternative

// correct usage (with correct types)
let fruit1 = Fruit.apple; // fruit1 == "apple"
fruit1 = Fruit.pear; // assigning a new fruit also works
let fruit2 = Fruit_values[0]; // fruit2 == "apple"

// incorrect usage (should error)
let fruit3 = Fruit.tire; // errors
let fruit4: Fruit = "mirror"; // errors

现在有人可能会问，这个“基于字符串的enum”比只使用:

type Fruit = "apple" | "pear";

有几个优点:

Auto-complete is a bit nicer (imo). For example, if you type let fruit = Fruit., Typescript will immediately list the exact set of options available. With string literals, you need to define your type explicitly, eg. let fruit: Fruit = , and then press ctrl+space afterward. (and even that results in unrelated autocomplete options being shown below the valid ones) The TSDoc metadata/description for an option is carried over to the MyEnum.XXX fields! This is useful for providing additional information about the different options. For example: You can access the list of options at runtime (eg. Fruit_values, or manually with Object.values(Fruit)). With the type Fruit = ... approach, there is no built-in way to do this, which cuts off a number of use-cases. (for example, I use the runtime values for constructing json-schemas)