TypeScript < 2.4

/** Utility function to create a K:V from a list of strings */
function strEnum<T extends string>(o: Array<T>): {[K in T]: K} {
  return o.reduce((res, key) => {
    res[key] = key;
    return res;
  }, Object.create(null));
}

/**
  * Sample create a string enum
  */

/** Create a K:V */
const Direction = strEnum([
  'North',
  'South',
  'East',
  'West'
])
/** Create a Type */
type Direction = keyof typeof Direction;

/** 
  * Sample using a string enum
  */
let sample: Direction;

sample = Direction.North; // Okay
sample = 'North'; // Okay
sample = 'AnythingElse'; // ERROR!

从https://basarat.gitbooks.io/typescript/docs/types/literal-types.html

到源代码链接，你可以找到更多更简单的方法来实现字符串文字类型

我也有同样的问题，然后想出了一个很好用的函数:

每个条目的键和值都是字符串，并且相同。 每个条目的值都是从键派生出来的。(即。“不要重复你自己”，不像字符串值的常规枚举) TypeScript类型成熟且正确。(防止拼写错误) 还有一种简单的方法可以让TS自动完成您的选项。(如。打字MyEnum。，并立即看到可用的选项) 还有其他一些优点。(见答案底部)

效用函数:

export function createStringEnum<T extends {[key: string]: 1}>(keysObj: T) {
    const optionsObj = {} as {
        [K in keyof T]: keyof T
        // alternative; gives narrower type for MyEnum.XXX
        //[K in keyof T]: K
    };
    const keys = Object.keys(keysObj) as Array<keyof T>;
    const values = keys; // could also check for string value-overrides on keysObj
    for (const key of keys) {
        optionsObj[key] = key;
    }
    return [optionsObj, values] as const;
}

用法:

// if the "Fruit_values" var isn't useful to you, just omit it
export const [Fruit, Fruit_values] = createStringEnum({
    apple: 1,
    pear: 1,
});
export type Fruit = keyof typeof Fruit; // "apple" | "pear"
//export type Fruit = typeof Fruit_values[number]; // alternative

// correct usage (with correct types)
let fruit1 = Fruit.apple; // fruit1 == "apple"
fruit1 = Fruit.pear; // assigning a new fruit also works
let fruit2 = Fruit_values[0]; // fruit2 == "apple"

// incorrect usage (should error)
let fruit3 = Fruit.tire; // errors
let fruit4: Fruit = "mirror"; // errors

现在有人可能会问，这个“基于字符串的enum”比只使用:

type Fruit = "apple" | "pear";

有几个优点:

Auto-complete is a bit nicer (imo). For example, if you type let fruit = Fruit., Typescript will immediately list the exact set of options available. With string literals, you need to define your type explicitly, eg. let fruit: Fruit = , and then press ctrl+space afterward. (and even that results in unrelated autocomplete options being shown below the valid ones) The TSDoc metadata/description for an option is carried over to the MyEnum.XXX fields! This is useful for providing additional information about the different options. For example: You can access the list of options at runtime (eg. Fruit_values, or manually with Object.values(Fruit)). With the type Fruit = ... approach, there is no built-in way to do this, which cuts off a number of use-cases. (for example, I use the runtime values for constructing json-schemas)

为什么不直接使用本地方式访问枚举的字符串呢?

enum e {
  WHY,
  NOT,
  USE,
  NATIVE
}

e[e.WHY] // this returns string 'WHY'

如果你想要的主要是易于调试(相当类型检查)，不需要为枚举指定特殊值，这是我正在做的:

export type Enum = { [index: number]: string } & { [key: string]: number } | Object;

/**
 * inplace update
 * */
export function enum_only_string<E extends Enum>(e: E) {
  Object.keys(e)
    .filter(i => Number.isFinite(+i))
    .forEach(i => {
      const s = e[i];
      e[s] = s;
      delete e[i];
    });
}

enum AuthType {
  phone, email, sms, password
}
enum_only_string(AuthType);

如果您希望支持遗留代码/数据存储，则可以保留数字键。

这样，您就可以避免键入两次值。

这里有一个相当干净的解决方案，它允许继承，使用TypeScript 2.0。我没有在早期的版本上尝试过。

附加条件:该值可以是任何类型!

export class Enum<T> {
  public constructor(public readonly value: T) {}
  public toString() {
    return this.value.toString();
  }
}

export class PrimaryColor extends Enum<string> {
  public static readonly Red = new Enum('#FF0000');
  public static readonly Green = new Enum('#00FF00');
  public static readonly Blue = new Enum('#0000FF');
}

export class Color extends PrimaryColor {
  public static readonly White = new Enum('#FFFFFF');
  public static readonly Black = new Enum('#000000');
}

// Usage:

console.log(PrimaryColor.Red);
// Output: Enum { value: '#FF0000' }
console.log(Color.Red); // inherited!
// Output: Enum { value: '#FF0000' }
console.log(Color.Red.value); // we have to call .value to get the value.
// Output: #FF0000
console.log(Color.Red.toString()); // toString() works too.
// Output: #FF0000

class Thing {
  color: Color;
}

let thing: Thing = {
  color: Color.Red,
};

switch (thing.color) {
  case Color.Red: // ...
  case Color.White: // ...
}

最近在使用TypeScript 1.0.1时遇到了这个问题，并以这种方式解决了:

enum IEvents {
        /** A click on a product or product link for one or more products. */
        CLICK,
        /** A view of product details. */
        DETAIL,
        /** Adding one or more products to a shopping cart. */
        ADD,
        /** Remove one or more products from a shopping cart. */
        REMOVE,
        /** Initiating the checkout process for one or more products. */
        CHECKOUT,
        /** Sending the option value for a given checkout step. */
        CHECKOUT_OPTION,
        /** The sale of one or more products. */
        PURCHASE,
        /** The refund of one or more products. */
        REFUND,
        /** A click on an internal promotion. */
        PROMO_CLICK
}

var Events = [
        'click',
        'detail',
        'add',
        'remove',
        'checkout',
        'checkout_option',
        'purchase',
        'refund',
        'promo_click'
];

function stuff(event: IEvents):boolean {
        // event can now be only IEvents constants
        Events[event]; // event is actually a number that matches the index of the array
}
// stuff('click') won't work, it needs to be called using stuff(IEvents.CLICK)