@basarat的回答很棒。下面是一个你可以使用的简化但有点扩展的例子:

export type TMyEnumType = 'value1'|'value2';

export class MyEnumType {
    static VALUE1: TMyEnumType = 'value1';
    static VALUE2: TMyEnumType = 'value2';
}

console.log(MyEnumType.VALUE1); // 'value1'

const variable = MyEnumType.VALUE2; // it has the string value 'value2'

switch (variable) {
    case MyEnumType.VALUE1:
        // code...

    case MyEnumType.VALUE2:
        // code...
}

为什么不直接使用本地方式访问枚举的字符串呢?

enum e {
  WHY,
  NOT,
  USE,
  NATIVE
}

e[e.WHY] // this returns string 'WHY'

我只是声明了一个接口，并使用该类型的变量访问枚举。保持接口和枚举同步实际上很容易，因为如果枚举中有什么变化，TypeScript会报错，就像这样。

typeof EAbFlagEnum类型的参数不可赋值 参数类型为“IAbFlagEnum”。属性“Move”类型缺失 “typeof EAbFlagEnum”。

这种方法的优点是在各种情况下使用enum(接口)不需要类型强制转换，因此支持更多类型的情况，例如switch/case。

// Declare a TypeScript enum using unique string 
//  (per hack mentioned by zjc0816)

enum EAbFlagEnum {
  None      = <any> "none",
  Select    = <any> "sel",
  Move      = <any> "mov",
  Edit      = <any> "edit",
  Sort      = <any> "sort",
  Clone     = <any> "clone"
}

// Create an interface that shadows the enum
//   and asserts that members are a type of any

interface IAbFlagEnum {
    None:   any;
    Select: any;
    Move:   any;
    Edit:   any;
    Sort:   any;
    Clone:  any;
}

// Export a variable of type interface that points to the enum

export var AbFlagEnum: IAbFlagEnum = EAbFlagEnum;

使用变量，而不是枚举，可以产生所需的结果。

var strVal: string = AbFlagEnum.Edit;

switch (strVal) {
  case AbFlagEnum.Edit:
    break;
  case AbFlagEnum.Move:
    break;
  case AbFlagEnum.Clone
}

标记是我的另一个需要，所以我创建了一个NPM模块，添加到这个例子中，并包括测试。

https://github.com/djabraham/ts-enum-tools

更新:TypeScript 3.4

你可以简单地使用const:

const AwesomeType = {
   Foo: "foo",
   Bar: "bar"
} as const;

打字稿2.1

这也可以用这种方式完成。希望它能帮助到一些人。

const AwesomeType = {
    Foo: "foo" as "foo",
    Bar: "bar" as "bar"
};

type AwesomeType = (typeof AwesomeType)[keyof typeof AwesomeType];

console.log(AwesomeType.Bar); // returns bar
console.log(AwesomeType.Foo); // returns foo

function doSth(awesometype: AwesomeType) {
    console.log(awesometype);
}

doSth("foo") // return foo
doSth("bar") // returns bar
doSth(AwesomeType.Bar) // returns bar
doSth(AwesomeType.Foo) // returns foo
doSth('error') // does not compile

这对我来说很管用:

class MyClass {
    static MyEnum: { Value1; Value2; Value3; }
    = {
        Value1: "Value1",
        Value2: "Value2",
        Value3: "Value3"
    };
}

or

module MyModule {
    export var MyEnum: { Value1; Value2; Value3; }
    = {
        Value1: "Value1",
        Value2: "Value2",
        Value3: "Value3"
    };
}

8)

更新:在发布这篇文章后不久，我发现了另一种方法，但忘记发布更新(然而，上面已经有人提到过了):

enum MyEnum {
    value1 = <any>"value1 ", 
    value2 = <any>"value2 ", 
    value3 = <any>"value3 " 
}

我也有同样的问题，然后想出了一个很好用的函数:

每个条目的键和值都是字符串，并且相同。 每个条目的值都是从键派生出来的。(即。“不要重复你自己”，不像字符串值的常规枚举) TypeScript类型成熟且正确。(防止拼写错误) 还有一种简单的方法可以让TS自动完成您的选项。(如。打字MyEnum。，并立即看到可用的选项) 还有其他一些优点。(见答案底部)

效用函数:

export function createStringEnum<T extends {[key: string]: 1}>(keysObj: T) {
    const optionsObj = {} as {
        [K in keyof T]: keyof T
        // alternative; gives narrower type for MyEnum.XXX
        //[K in keyof T]: K
    };
    const keys = Object.keys(keysObj) as Array<keyof T>;
    const values = keys; // could also check for string value-overrides on keysObj
    for (const key of keys) {
        optionsObj[key] = key;
    }
    return [optionsObj, values] as const;
}

用法:

// if the "Fruit_values" var isn't useful to you, just omit it
export const [Fruit, Fruit_values] = createStringEnum({
    apple: 1,
    pear: 1,
});
export type Fruit = keyof typeof Fruit; // "apple" | "pear"
//export type Fruit = typeof Fruit_values[number]; // alternative

// correct usage (with correct types)
let fruit1 = Fruit.apple; // fruit1 == "apple"
fruit1 = Fruit.pear; // assigning a new fruit also works
let fruit2 = Fruit_values[0]; // fruit2 == "apple"

// incorrect usage (should error)
let fruit3 = Fruit.tire; // errors
let fruit4: Fruit = "mirror"; // errors

现在有人可能会问，这个“基于字符串的enum”比只使用:

type Fruit = "apple" | "pear";

有几个优点:

Auto-complete is a bit nicer (imo). For example, if you type let fruit = Fruit., Typescript will immediately list the exact set of options available. With string literals, you need to define your type explicitly, eg. let fruit: Fruit = , and then press ctrl+space afterward. (and even that results in unrelated autocomplete options being shown below the valid ones) The TSDoc metadata/description for an option is carried over to the MyEnum.XXX fields! This is useful for providing additional information about the different options. For example: You can access the list of options at runtime (eg. Fruit_values, or manually with Object.values(Fruit)). With the type Fruit = ... approach, there is no built-in way to do this, which cuts off a number of use-cases. (for example, I use the runtime values for constructing json-schemas)