这就像苹果和橘子。两者都有不同的设计和理念。Vim是一个文本编辑器，而Emacs是一个Lisp解释器，可以进行文本编辑。

我使用Vim是因为它快速、狡猾，而且非常擅长处理文本。它具有可组合的自然键绑定，可以使您的开发任务真正协调一致。Vim基于一种简单的*nix哲学，即做好一件事——即文本操作。

使用bash/zsh和tmux扩展Vim通常很简单，可以学到很多东西。恕我直言，这是一个很好的学习曲线。关键是要学习如何集成这些东西以获得更大的工作应用程序。使用Vim，您需要学习集成，因为除非您告诉它如何进行集成，否则它不会自然地进行集成。另一个值得我使用的扩展是Tig。它是一个基于ncurses的Git前端。我只是有一个绑定，它无声地打开Tig，然后我在那里做所有Git的事情。

由最终用户来决定什么是最好的。Emacs和Vim经受住了时间的考验，证明了它们的价值。最终，一个优秀的程序员只需要一支笔和一张纸就可以发挥创造力。好的算法不需要编辑器的支持。所以两种方法都试试，看看哪种方法能让你更有效率。从这两个软件中学习设计模式，因为有很多东西需要学习和发现!

现在你甚至不需要考虑这两者之间的区别，因为Spacemacs。它是一个社区驱动的Emacs发行版。

正如它所说，

最好的编辑器既不是Emacs也不是vim，而是Emacs和vim。

Spacemacs结合了Emacs和Vim的优点，使您的生活和工作更加轻松。

请看下面的截图，

(来源:spacemacs.org)

Emacs具有Viper模式，因此在某种意义上，它提供了一个超特性集(除了那些在使用Viper和Vimpulse的Emacs中缺少哪些Vim特性?)

vi(和VIM IIRC)的重量较轻(它可以就地编辑文件)，但提供的功能较少(子进程通信、扩展语言)。

Seems an answer has been selected already, but the big difference to me has always been the modal vs. non-modal. Vim is modal, which means that it makes optimizations based on a specific set of usage modes. At least that's how I've always looked at it. This makes using Vim a different experience because instead of having a work area that you type code in, you really are telling an environment to act on the text. This is why people say things like with Vim you really are learning a language. The :wq and :s/foo/bar is all part of a shell like environment that edits and reads text.

Emacs on the other hand is much closer to most editors/word processors/etc. you see today. You have a workspace that has a highly programmable interface. That is why you see things like email, irc, shells, etc. As a programmer it is easy to think in terms of saying "take the line number I'm on and do something with the information". The desire to leave the editor becomes less because instead of having to quit, open some other app/language and do things on some text, you have Emacs where you can do these things within the scope of your editor.

这两种观点并不一定是对立的，只是它们揭示了两个不同的焦点。就我个人而言，我使用Emacs，但我见过非常了解Vim的人，他们可以诚实地说，选择哪种并不重要。我首先尝试了Vim，但Emacs最终支持了我。的确，无论您选择什么，您都应该至少在一定程度上精通Vim，因为它总是可用的。

我已经在生产/研究环境中使用spacemacs大约2年，neovim大约1年。Spacemacs是带有一些额外功能的emacs，比如图层等。neovim又是vim的一个分支，具有一些额外的特性。

就经验而言，我对他们俩都不太满意。我仍然在寻找一个长期的解决方案来满足我的文本编辑需求。

这里有一个简单的对比:

Neovim, vim, emacs, spacemacs, etc all of those editors consume less ressources compared to most of the editors out there. Neovim/vim is slightly faster than emacs, noticably faster than spacemacs. In terms of editing experience. I can easily say that emacs packages feel superior. I think that's because they blend in better with the core of emacs. Vimscript is nice and there are certainly great projects in the vim ecosystem as well. The good thing is they are better documented than most emacs projects I have seen so far. Both can be glitchy depending on the package you are using. Spacemacs tend to freeze, and neovim tend to display scary error messages, so pick your poison there. Modal editing in vim, is not an intuitive concept, but once you get used to it, you want it anywere. Both of the editor provide that.

我想引用《UNIX编程的艺术》一书中的一段话:

Many people who regularly use both vi and Emacs tend to use them for different things, and find it valuable to know both. In general, vi is best for small jobs – quick replies to mail, simple tweaks to system configuration, and the like. It is especially useful when you’re using a new system (or a remote one over a network) and don’t have your Emacs customization files handy. Emacs comes into its own for extended editing sessions in which you have to handle complex tasks, modify multiple files, and use results from other programs during the session. For programmers using X on their console (which is typical on modern Unixes), it’s normal to start up Emacs shortly after login time in a large window and leave it running forever, possibly visiting dozens of files and even running programs in multiple Emacs subwindows.

我在这里真正想强调的是:“许多人发现两者都知道是有价值的。