如果希望避免使用外部库，可以简洁地实现groupBy（）的普通版本，如下所示：

var groupBy=函数（xs，key）{返回xs.reduce（函数（rv，x）{（rv[x[key]]=rv[x[键]]| |[]）.push（x）；返回rv；}, {});};console.log（groupBy（['one'，'two'，'three']，'length'））；//=>｛“3”：[“1”，“2”]，“5”：[”3“]｝

在我的特定用例中，我需要按属性分组，然后删除分组属性。

无论如何，该属性只是为了分组目的而添加到记录中的，对于向用户显示它没有意义。

    group (arr, key) {

        let prop;

        return arr.reduce(function(rv, x) {
            prop = x[key];
            delete x[key];
            (rv[prop] = (rv[prop] || [])).push(x);
            return rv;
        }, {});

    },

顶部答案中的起始函数归功于@caesar bautista。

使用ES6的简单解决方案：

该方法有一个返回模型，可以比较n个财产。

const compareKey = (item, key, compareItem) => {
    return item[key] === compareItem[key]
}

const handleCountingRelatedItems = (listItems, modelCallback, compareKeyCallback) => {
    return listItems.reduce((previousValue, currentValue) => {
        if (Array.isArray(previousValue)) {
        const foundIndex = previousValue.findIndex(item => compareKeyCallback(item, currentValue))

        if (foundIndex > -1) {
            const count = previousValue[foundIndex].count + 1

            previousValue[foundIndex] = modelCallback(currentValue, count)

            return previousValue
        }

        return [...previousValue, modelCallback(currentValue, 1)]
        }

        if (compareKeyCallback(previousValue, currentValue)) {
        return [modelCallback(currentValue, 2)]
        }

        return [modelCallback(previousValue, 1), modelCallback(currentValue, 1)]
    })
}

const itemList = [
    { type: 'production', human_readable: 'Production' },
    { type: 'test', human_readable: 'Testing' },
    { type: 'production', human_readable: 'Production' }
]

const model = (currentParam, count) => ({
    label: currentParam.human_readable,
    type: currentParam.type,
    count
})

const compareParameter = (item, compareValue) => {
    const isTypeEqual = compareKey(item, 'type', compareValue)
    return isTypeEqual
}

const result = handleCountingRelatedItems(itemList, model, compareParameter)

 console.log('Result: \n', result)
/** Result: 
    [
        { label: 'Production', type: 'production', count: 2 },
        { label: 'Testing', type: 'testing', count: 1 }
    ]
*/

发帖是因为即使这个问题已经7年了，我仍然没有看到一个符合原始标准的答案：

我不希望它们“拆分”，而是“合并”，更像SQL组方法

我最初发表这篇文章是因为我想找到一种方法来减少对象数组（例如，当您从csv中读取时创建的数据结构），并通过给定索引聚合以生成相同的数据结构。我正在寻找的返回值是另一个对象数组，而不是我在这里看到的嵌套对象或映射。

下面的函数获取一个数据集（对象数组）、一个索引列表（数组）和一个reducer函数，并将reducer功能应用于索引的结果作为一个对象数组返回。

function agg(data, indices, reducer) {

  // helper to create unique index as an array
  function getUniqueIndexHash(row, indices) {
    return indices.reduce((acc, curr) => acc + row[curr], "");
  }

  // reduce data to single object, whose values will be each of the new rows
  // structure is an object whose values are arrays
  // [{}] -> {{}}
  // no operation performed, simply grouping
  let groupedObj = data.reduce((acc, curr) => {
    let currIndex = getUniqueIndexHash(curr, indices);

    // if key does not exist, create array with current row
    if (!Object.keys(acc).includes(currIndex)) {
      acc = {...acc, [currIndex]: [curr]}
    // otherwise, extend the array at currIndex
    } else {
      acc = {...acc, [currIndex]: acc[currIndex].concat(curr)};
    }

    return acc;
  }, {})

  // reduce the array into a single object by applying the reducer
  let reduced = Object.values(groupedObj).map(arr => {
    // for each sub-array, reduce into single object using the reducer function
    let reduceValues = arr.reduce(reducer, {});

    // reducer returns simply the aggregates - add in the indices here
    // each of the objects in "arr" has the same indices, so we take the first
    let indexObj = indices.reduce((acc, curr) => {
      acc = {...acc, [curr]: arr[0][curr]};
      return acc;
    }, {});

    reduceValues = {...indexObj, ...reduceValues};


    return reduceValues;
  });


  return reduced;
}

我将创建一个返回count（*）和sum（Value）的reducer：

reducer = (acc, curr) => {
  acc.count = 1 + (acc.count || 0);
  acc.value = +curr.Value + (acc.value|| 0);
  return acc;
}

最后，使用我们的reducer将agg函数应用于原始数据集会生成一个应用了适当聚合的对象数组：

agg(tasks, ["Phase"], reducer);
// yields:
Array(2) [
  0: Object {Phase: "Phase 1", count: 4, value: 50}
  1: Object {Phase: "Phase 2", count: 4, value: 130}
]

agg(tasks, ["Phase", "Step"], reducer);
// yields:
Array(4) [
  0: Object {Phase: "Phase 1", Step: "Step 1", count: 2, value: 15}
  1: Object {Phase: "Phase 1", Step: "Step 2", count: 2, value: 35}
  2: Object {Phase: "Phase 2", Step: "Step 1", count: 2, value: 55}
  3: Object {Phase: "Phase 2", Step: "Step 2", count: 2, value: 75}
]

我从underscore.js fiddler那里借用了这个方法

window.helpers=(function (){
    var lookupIterator = function(value) {
        if (value == null){
            return function(value) {
                return value;
            };
        }
        if (typeof value === 'function'){
                return value;
        }
        return function(obj) {
            return obj[value];
        };
    },
    each = function(obj, iterator, context) {
        var breaker = {};
        if (obj == null) return obj;
        if (Array.prototype.forEach && obj.forEach === Array.prototype.forEach) {
            obj.forEach(iterator, context);
        } else if (obj.length === +obj.length) {
            for (var i = 0, length = obj.length; i < length; i++) {
                if (iterator.call(context, obj[i], i, obj) === breaker) return;
            }
        } else {
            var keys = []
            for (var key in obj) if (Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(obj, key)) keys.push(key)
            for (var i = 0, length = keys.length; i < length; i++) {
                if (iterator.call(context, obj[keys[i]], keys[i], obj) === breaker) return;
            }
        }
        return obj;
    },
    // An internal function used for aggregate "group by" operations.
    group = function(behavior) {
        return function(obj, iterator, context) {
            var result = {};
            iterator = lookupIterator(iterator);
            each(obj, function(value, index) {
                var key = iterator.call(context, value, index, obj);
                behavior(result, key, value);
            });
            return result;
        };
    };

    return {
      groupBy : group(function(result, key, value) {
        Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(result, key) ? result[key].push(value) :              result[key] = [value];
        })
    };
})();

var arr=[{a:1,b:2},{a:1,b:3},{a:1,b:1},{a:1,b:2},{a:1,b:3}];
 console.dir(helpers.groupBy(arr,"b"));
 console.dir(helpers.groupBy(arr,function (el){
   return el.b>2;
 }));

我想建议一下我的方法。首先，分开分组和聚合。让我们声明原型“groupby”函数。它需要另一个函数为要分组的每个数组元素生成“哈希”字符串。

Array.prototype.groupBy = function(hash){
  var _hash = hash ? hash : function(o){return o;};

  var _map = {};
  var put = function(map, key, value){
    if (!map[_hash(key)]) {
        map[_hash(key)] = {};
        map[_hash(key)].group = [];
        map[_hash(key)].key = key;

    }
    map[_hash(key)].group.push(value); 
  }

  this.map(function(obj){
    put(_map, obj, obj);
  });

  return Object.keys(_map).map(function(key){
    return {key: _map[key].key, group: _map[key].group};
  });
}

分组完成后，您可以根据需要聚合数据

data.groupBy(function(o){return JSON.stringify({a: o.Phase, b: o.Step});})
    /* aggreagating */
    .map(function(el){ 
         var sum = el.group.reduce(
           function(l,c){
             return l + parseInt(c.Value);
           },
           0
         );
         el.key.Value = sum; 
         return el.key;
    });

一般来说，它是有效的。我已经在chrome控制台中测试了这段代码。并随时改进和发现错误；）