我昨天对一个答案做了评论,有人在正则表达式中使用[0123456789]而不是[0-9]或\d。我说过,使用范围或数字说明符可能比使用字符集更有效。
我决定今天测试一下,并惊讶地发现(至少在c#正则表达式引擎中)\d似乎比其他两个似乎没有太大区别的效率要低。下面是我的测试输出超过10000个随机字符串的1000个随机字符,其中5077实际上包含一个数字:
Regex \d took 00:00:00.2141226 result: 5077/10000
Regex [0-9] took 00:00:00.1357972 result: 5077/10000 63.42 % of first
Regex [0123456789] took 00:00:00.1388997 result: 5077/10000 64.87 % of first
这让我很惊讶,有两个原因,如果有人能解释一下,我会很感兴趣:
我本以为范围会比集合更有效地实现。 我不明白为什么\d比[0-9]差。\d不仅仅是[0-9]的简写吗?
下面是测试代码:
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using System.Text;
using System.Diagnostics;
using System.Text.RegularExpressions;
namespace SO_RegexPerformance
{
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
var rand = new Random(1234);
var strings = new List<string>();
//10K random strings
for (var i = 0; i < 10000; i++)
{
//generate random string
var sb = new StringBuilder();
for (var c = 0; c < 1000; c++)
{
//add a-z randomly
sb.Append((char)('a' + rand.Next(26)));
}
//in roughly 50% of them, put a digit
if (rand.Next(2) == 0)
{
//replace 1 char with a digit 0-9
sb[rand.Next(sb.Length)] = (char)('0' + rand.Next(10));
}
strings.Add(sb.ToString());
}
var baseTime = testPerfomance(strings, @"\d");
Console.WriteLine();
var testTime = testPerfomance(strings, "[0-9]");
Console.WriteLine(" {0:P2} of first", testTime.TotalMilliseconds / baseTime.TotalMilliseconds);
testTime = testPerfomance(strings, "[0123456789]");
Console.WriteLine(" {0:P2} of first", testTime.TotalMilliseconds / baseTime.TotalMilliseconds);
}
private static TimeSpan testPerfomance(List<string> strings, string regex)
{
var sw = new Stopwatch();
int successes = 0;
var rex = new Regex(regex);
sw.Start();
foreach (var str in strings)
{
if (rex.Match(str).Success)
{
successes++;
}
}
sw.Stop();
Console.Write("Regex {0,-12} took {1} result: {2}/{3}", regex, sw.Elapsed, successes, strings.Count);
return sw.Elapsed;
}
}
}