检测链表中的循环可以用最简单的方法之一来完成，使用hashmap会导致O(N)复杂度，使用基于排序的方法会导致O(NlogN)复杂度。

当您从head开始遍历列表时，创建一个已排序的地址列表。当您插入一个新地址时，检查该地址是否已经在已排序的列表中，这需要O(logN)复杂度。

如果允许我们嵌入类Node，我将像下面实现的那样解决这个问题。hasLoop()在O(n)时间内运行，并且只占用计数器的空间。这是不是一个合适的解决方案?或者是否有一种不嵌入Node的方法?(显然，在真正的实现中会有更多的方法，如RemoveNode(Node n)等。)

public class LinkedNodeList {
    Node first;
    Int count;

    LinkedNodeList(){
        first = null;
        count = 0;
    }

    LinkedNodeList(Node n){
        if (n.next != null){
            throw new error("must start with single node!");
        } else {
            first = n;
            count = 1;
        }
    }

    public void addNode(Node n){
        Node lookingAt = first;

        while(lookingAt.next != null){
            lookingAt = lookingAt.next;
        }

        lookingAt.next = n;
        count++;
    }

    public boolean hasLoop(){

        int counter = 0;
        Node lookingAt = first;

        while(lookingAt.next != null){
            counter++;
            if (count < counter){
                return false;
            } else {
               lookingAt = lookingAt.next;
            }
        }

        return true;

    }



    private class Node{
        Node next;
        ....
    }

}

这是我在java中的解决方案

boolean detectLoop(Node head){
    Node fastRunner = head;
    Node slowRunner = head;
    while(fastRunner != null && slowRunner !=null && fastRunner.next != null){
        fastRunner = fastRunner.next.next;
        slowRunner = slowRunner.next;
        if(fastRunner == slowRunner){
            return true;
        }
    }
    return false;
}

这是我的可运行代码。

我所做的是通过使用三个临时节点(空间复杂度O(1))来对链表进行尊崇，以跟踪链接。

有趣的是，这样做有助于检测链表中的循环，因为当你向前移动时，你不期望回到起点(根节点)，其中一个临时节点应该为null，除非你有一个循环，这意味着它指向根节点。

该算法的时间复杂度为O(n)，空间复杂度为O(1)。

下面是链表的类节点:

public class LinkedNode{
    public LinkedNode next;
}

下面是带有三个节点的简单测试用例的主要代码，最后一个节点指向第二个节点:

    public static boolean checkLoopInLinkedList(LinkedNode root){

        if (root == null || root.next == null) return false;

        LinkedNode current1 = root, current2 = root.next, current3 = root.next.next;
        root.next = null;
        current2.next = current1;

        while(current3 != null){
            if(current3 == root) return true;

            current1 = current2;
            current2 = current3;
            current3 = current3.next;

            current2.next = current1;
        }
        return false;
    }

下面是一个简单的三个节点的测试用例，最后一个节点指向第二个节点:

public class questions{
    public static void main(String [] args){

        LinkedNode n1 = new LinkedNode();
        LinkedNode n2 = new LinkedNode();
        LinkedNode n3 = new LinkedNode();
        n1.next = n2;
        n2.next = n3;
        n3.next = n2;

        System.out.print(checkLoopInLinkedList(n1));
    }
}

public boolean hasLoop(Node start){   
   TreeSet<Node> set = new TreeSet<Node>();
   Node lookingAt = start;

   while (lookingAt.peek() != null){
       lookingAt = lookingAt.next;

       if (set.contains(lookingAt){
           return false;
        } else {
        set.put(lookingAt);
        }

        return true;
}   
// Inside our Node class:        
public Node peek(){
   return this.next;
}

请原谅我的无知(我对Java和编程仍然相当陌生)，但为什么上面的方法不能工作呢?

I guess this doesn't solve the constant space issue... but it does at least get there in a reasonable time, correct? It will only take the space of the linked list plus the space of a set with n elements (where n is the number of elements in the linked list, or the number of elements until it reaches a loop). And for time, worst-case analysis, I think, would suggest O(nlog(n)). SortedSet look-ups for contains() are log(n) (check the javadoc, but I'm pretty sure TreeSet's underlying structure is TreeMap, whose in turn is a red-black tree), and in the worst case (no loops, or loop at very end), it will have to do n look-ups.

乌龟和兔子的另一种解决方案，不太好，因为我暂时改变了列表:

这个想法是遍历列表，并在执行过程中反转它。然后，当你第一次到达一个已经被访问过的节点时，它的next指针将指向“向后”，导致迭代再次朝第一个方向进行，并在那里终止。

Node prev = null;
Node cur = first;
while (cur != null) {
    Node next = cur.next;
    cur.next = prev;
    prev = cur;
    cur = next;
}
boolean hasCycle = prev == first && first != null && first.next != null;

// reconstruct the list
cur = prev;
prev = null;
while (cur != null) {
    Node next = cur.next;
    cur.next = prev;
    prev = cur;
    cur = next;
}

return hasCycle;

测试代码:

static void assertSameOrder(Node[] nodes) {
    for (int i = 0; i < nodes.length - 1; i++) {
        assert nodes[i].next == nodes[i + 1];
    }
}

public static void main(String[] args) {
    Node[] nodes = new Node[100];
    for (int i = 0; i < nodes.length; i++) {
        nodes[i] = new Node();
    }
    for (int i = 0; i < nodes.length - 1; i++) {
        nodes[i].next = nodes[i + 1];
    }
    Node first = nodes[0];
    Node max = nodes[nodes.length - 1];

    max.next = null;
    assert !hasCycle(first);
    assertSameOrder(nodes);
    max.next = first;
    assert hasCycle(first);
    assertSameOrder(nodes);
    max.next = max;
    assert hasCycle(first);
    assertSameOrder(nodes);
    max.next = nodes[50];
    assert hasCycle(first);
    assertSameOrder(nodes);
}