这是我对这个问题的解决办法

const _ = require('lodash');

var objects = [{ 'x': 1, 'y': 2, 'z':3, a:{b:1, c:2, d:{n:0}}, p:[1, 2, 3]  }, { 'x': 2, 'y': 1, z:3, a:{b:2, c:2,d:{n:1}}, p:[1,3], m:3  }];

const diffFn=(a,b, path='')=>_.reduce(a, function(result, value, key) {

    if(_.isObjectLike(value)){
      if(_.isEqual(value, b[key])){
        return result;
      }else{

return result.concat(diffFn(value, b[key], path?(`${path}.${key}`):key))
      }
    }else{
return _.isEqual(value, b[key]) ?
        result : result.concat(path?(`${path}.${key}`):key);
    }
    
}, []);

const diffKeys1=diffFn(objects[0], objects[1])
const diffKeys2=diffFn(objects[1], objects[0])
const diffKeys=_.union(diffKeys1, diffKeys2)
const res={};

_.forEach(diffKeys, (key)=>_.assign(res, {[key]:{ old: _.get(objects[0], key), new:_.get(objects[1], key)} }))

res
/*
Returns
{
  x: { old: 1, new: 2 },
  y: { old: 2, new: 1 },
  'a.b': { old: 1, new: 2 },
  'a.d.n': { old: 0, new: 1 },
  'p.1': { old: 2, new: 3 },
  'p.2': { old: 3, new: undefined },
  m: { old: undefined, new: 3 }
}
*/

已经有很多答案发布，但对于那些好奇的人来说，避免编写任何代码来计算具有任何类型结构的两个对象之间的差异，实际上有一个库可以做到这一点。Lodash isEqual只返回true或false，它不返回任何关于更改属性的信息。https://www.npmjs.com/package/deep-diff

它返回两个对象之间差异的完整细节

import DeepDiff from 'deep-diff';
let a = {...} //some object
let b = {...} //some object 
var differences = DeepDiff.diff(a, b);

在这篇文章中也有人提出了类似的问题 获取2个JSON对象之间的差异

如果你只需要键比较:

 _.reduce(a, function(result, value, key) {
     return b[key] === undefined ? key : []
  }, []);

此解决方案返回一个具有修改过的属性的对象。

_.reduce(a, (r, v, k) => { return _.merge(r, _.isEqual(v, b[k]) ? {} : { [k]: v }); }, {});

As it was asked, here's a recursive object comparison function. And a bit more. Assuming that primary use of such function is object inspection, I have something to say. Complete deep comparison is a bad idea when some differences are irrelevant. For example, blind deep comparison in TDD assertions makes tests unnecessary brittle. For that reason, I'd like to introduce a much more valuable partial diff. It is a recursive analogue of a previous contribution to this thread. It ignores keys not present in a

var bdiff = (a, b) =>
    _.reduce(a, (res, val, key) =>
        res.concat((_.isPlainObject(val) || _.isArray(val)) && b
            ? bdiff(val, b[key]).map(x => key + '.' + x) 
            : (!b || val != b[key] ? [key] : [])),
        []);

BDiff允许检查期望值，同时容忍其他属性，这正是您想要的自动检查。这允许构建各种高级断言。例如:

var diff = bdiff(expected, actual);
// all expected properties match
console.assert(diff.length == 0, "Objects differ", diff, expected, actual);
// controlled inequality
console.assert(diff.length < 3, "Too many differences", diff, expected, actual);

回到完整的解决方案。使用bdiff构建一个完整的传统diff是很简单的:

function diff(a, b) {
    var u = bdiff(a, b), v = bdiff(b, a);
    return u.filter(x=>!v.includes(x)).map(x=>' < ' + x)
    .concat(u.filter(x=>v.includes(x)).map(x=>' | ' + x))
    .concat(v.filter(x=>!u.includes(x)).map(x=>' > ' + x));
};

在两个复杂对象上运行上述函数将输出类似于下面的内容:

 [
  " < components.0.components.1.components.1.isNew",
  " < components.0.cryptoKey",
  " | components.0.components.2.components.2.components.2.FFT.min",
  " | components.0.components.2.components.2.components.2.FFT.max",
  " > components.0.components.1.components.1.merkleTree",
  " > components.0.components.2.components.2.components.2.merkleTree",
  " > components.0.components.3.FFTResult"
 ]

最后，为了了解值之间的差异，我们可能需要直接eval() diff输出。为此，我们需要一个更丑的bdiff版本，输出语法正确的路径:

// provides syntactically correct output
var bdiff = (a, b) =>
    _.reduce(a, (res, val, key) =>
        res.concat((_.isPlainObject(val) || _.isArray(val)) && b
            ? bdiff(val, b[key]).map(x => 
                key + (key.trim ? '':']') + (x.search(/^\d/)? '.':'[') + x)
            : (!b || val != b[key] ? [key + (key.trim ? '':']')] : [])),
        []);

// now we can eval output of the diff fuction that we left unchanged
diff(a, b).filter(x=>x[1] == '|').map(x=>[x].concat([a, b].map(y=>((z) =>eval('z.' + x.substr(3))).call(this, y)))));

这将输出类似于下面的内容:

[" | components[0].components[2].components[2].components[2].FFT.min", 0, 3]
[" | components[0].components[2].components[2].components[2].FFT.max", 100, 50]

“一族”许可

一个简单而优雅的解决方案是使用_。isEqual，它执行深度比较:

Var a = {}; Var b = {}; A.prop1 = 2; A.prop2 = {prop3: 2}; B.prop1 = 2; B.prop2 = {prop3: 3}; console.log(_。isEqual (a, b));//如果不同则返回false < script src = " https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.4/lodash.min.js " > < /脚本>

然而，这个解决方案并没有显示哪个属性是不同的。