我有一些问题,试图包装我的代码在单元测试中使用。问题在于。我有接口IHttpHandler:

public interface IHttpHandler
{
    HttpClient client { get; }
}

使用它的类HttpHandler:

public class HttpHandler : IHttpHandler
{
    public HttpClient client
    {
        get
        {
            return new HttpClient();
        }
    }
}

然后是Connection类,它使用simpleIOC注入客户端实现:

public class Connection
{
    private IHttpHandler _httpClient;

    public Connection(IHttpHandler httpClient)
    {
        _httpClient = httpClient;
    }
}

然后我有一个单元测试项目,它有这个类:

private IHttpHandler _httpClient;

[TestMethod]
public void TestMockConnection()
{
    var client = new Connection(_httpClient);
     
    client.doSomething();  

    // Here I want to somehow create a mock instance of the http client
    // Instead of the real one. How Should I approach this?     

}

现在很明显,我将在Connection类中拥有从后端检索数据(JSON)的方法。但是,我想为这个类编写单元测试,显然我不想针对真正的后端编写测试,而是一个模拟的后端。我试着给这个问题一个好的答案,但没有成功。我以前可以用Moq来模拟,但从来没有在HttpClient这样的东西上使用过。我应该如何处理这个问题?


当前回答

如果您不介意运行自己的http服务器,可以尝试Xim。其实很简单:

using Xim.Simulators.Api;
[Test]
public async Task TestHttpGetMethod()
{
    using var simulation = Simulation.Create();
    using var api = simulation
        .AddApi()
        .AddHandler("GET /books/1234", ApiResponse.Ok())
        .Build();
    await api.StartAsync();
    var httpClient = new HttpClient();

    var response = await httpClient.SendAsync(new HttpRequestMessage(HttpMethod.Get, $"{api.Location}/books/1234"));

    Assert.AreEqual(HttpStatusCode.OK, response.StatusCode);
    Assert.IsTrue(api.ReceivedApiCalls.Any(call => call.Action == "GET /books/1234"));
}

这是使用模拟的一个很好的替代方案,可能适合您在某些场景中的需求。它建立在Kestrel的基础上(是的,我是作者)。

其他回答

这是一个老问题,但我有一种冲动,想用一个我在这里没有看到的解决方案来扩展答案。 您可以伪造Microsoft程序集(System.Net.Http),然后在测试期间使用ShinsContext。

In VS 2017, right click on the System.Net.Http assembly and choose "Add Fakes Assembly" Put your code in the unit test method under a ShimsContext.Create() using. This way, you can isolate the code where you are planning to fake the HttpClient. Depends on your implementation and test, I would suggest to implement all the desired acting where you call a method on the HttpClient and want to fake the returned value. Using ShimHttpClient.AllInstances will fake your implementation in all the instances created during your test. For example, if you want to fake the GetAsync() method, do the following: [TestMethod] public void FakeHttpClient() { using (ShimsContext.Create()) { System.Net.Http.Fakes.ShimHttpClient.AllInstances.GetAsyncString = (c, requestUri) => { //Return a service unavailable response var httpResponseMessage = new HttpResponseMessage(HttpStatusCode.ServiceUnavailable); var task = Task.FromResult(httpResponseMessage); return task; }; //your implementation will use the fake method(s) automatically var client = new Connection(_httpClient); client.doSomething(); } }

加入这个派对有点晚了,但我喜欢在带有下游REST依赖的dotnet核心微服务的集成测试中尽可能使用wiremocking (https://github.com/WireMock-Net/WireMock.Net)。

通过实现一个扩展IHttpClientFactory的TestHttpClientFactory,我们可以重写这个方法

HttpClient CreateClient(字符串名称)

所以当你在应用中使用命名客户端时,你可以控制返回一个连接到你的wiremock的HttpClient。

这种方法的好处是,您不会更改正在测试的应用程序中的任何内容,并且允许课程集成测试对您的服务执行实际的REST请求,并模拟实际下游请求应该返回的json(或任何东西)。这将导致在应用程序中进行简洁的测试和尽可能少的模拟。

    public class TestHttpClientFactory : IHttpClientFactory 
{
    public HttpClient CreateClient(string name)
    {
        var httpClient = new HttpClient
        {
            BaseAddress = new Uri(G.Config.Get<string>($"App:Endpoints:{name}"))
            // G.Config is our singleton config access, so the endpoint 
            // to the running wiremock is used in the test
        };
        return httpClient;
    }
}

and

// in bootstrap of your Microservice
IHttpClientFactory factory = new TestHttpClientFactory();
container.Register<IHttpClientFactory>(factory);

很多答案我都不相信。

首先,假设您想要对一个使用HttpClient的方法进行单元测试。您不应该在实现中直接实例化HttpClient。您应该注入一个负责为您提供HttpClient实例的工厂。这样你以后就可以模拟那个工厂并返回任何你想要的HttpClient(例如:一个模拟HttpClient而不是真正的HttpClient)。

所以,你会有一个这样的工厂:

public interface IHttpClientFactory
{
    HttpClient Create();
}

和一个实现:

public class HttpClientFactory
    : IHttpClientFactory
{
    public HttpClient Create()
    {
        var httpClient = new HttpClient();
        return httpClient;
    }
}

当然,你需要在你的IoC容器中注册这个实现。如果你使用Autofac,它会是这样的:

builder
    .RegisterType<IHttpClientFactory>()
    .As<HttpClientFactory>()
    .SingleInstance();

现在您将拥有一个适当的、可测试的实现。假设你的方法是这样的:

public class MyHttpClient
    : IMyHttpClient
{
    private readonly IHttpClientFactory _httpClientFactory;

    public SalesOrderHttpClient(IHttpClientFactory httpClientFactory)
    {
        _httpClientFactory = httpClientFactory;
    }

    public async Task<string> PostAsync(Uri uri, string content)
    {
        using (var client = _httpClientFactory.Create())
        {
            var clientAddress = uri.GetLeftPart(UriPartial.Authority);
            client.BaseAddress = new Uri(clientAddress);
            var content = new StringContent(content, Encoding.UTF8, "application/json");
            var uriAbsolutePath = uri.AbsolutePath;
            var response = await client.PostAsync(uriAbsolutePath, content);
            var responseJson = response.Content.ReadAsStringAsync().Result;
            return responseJson;
        }
    }
}

现在是测试部分。HttpClient扩展了抽象的HttpMessageHandler。让我们创建一个接受委托的HttpMessageHandler的“模拟”,这样当我们使用模拟时,我们也可以为每个测试设置每个行为。

public class MockHttpMessageHandler 
    : HttpMessageHandler
{
    private readonly Func<HttpRequestMessage, CancellationToken, Task<HttpResponseMessage>> _sendAsyncFunc;

    public MockHttpMessageHandler(Func<HttpRequestMessage, CancellationToken, Task<HttpResponseMessage>> sendAsyncFunc)
    {
        _sendAsyncFunc = sendAsyncFunc;
    }

    protected override async Task<HttpResponseMessage> SendAsync(HttpRequestMessage request, CancellationToken cancellationToken)
    {
        return await _sendAsyncFunc.Invoke(request, cancellationToken);
    }
}

现在,在Moq(以及FluentAssertions,一个使单元测试更具可读性的库)的帮助下,我们拥有了对使用HttpClient的方法PostAsync进行单元测试所需的一切

public static class PostAsyncTests
{
    public class Given_A_Uri_And_A_JsonMessage_When_Posting_Async
        : Given_WhenAsync_Then_Test
    {
        private SalesOrderHttpClient _sut;
        private Uri _uri;
        private string _content;
        private string _expectedResult;
        private string _result;

        protected override void Given()
        {
            _uri = new Uri("http://test.com/api/resources");
            _content = "{\"foo\": \"bar\"}";
            _expectedResult = "{\"result\": \"ok\"}";

            var httpClientFactoryMock = new Mock<IHttpClientFactory>();
            var messageHandlerMock =
                new MockHttpMessageHandler((request, cancellation) =>
                {
                    var responseMessage =
                        new HttpResponseMessage(HttpStatusCode.Created)
                        {
                            Content = new StringContent("{\"result\": \"ok\"}")
                        };

                    var result = Task.FromResult(responseMessage);
                    return result;
                });

            var httpClient = new HttpClient(messageHandlerMock);
            httpClientFactoryMock
                .Setup(x => x.Create())
                .Returns(httpClient);

            var httpClientFactory = httpClientFactoryMock.Object;

            _sut = new SalesOrderHttpClient(httpClientFactory);
        }

        protected override async Task WhenAsync()
        {
            _result = await _sut.PostAsync(_uri, _content);
        }


        [Fact]
        public void Then_It_Should_Return_A_Valid_JsonMessage()
        {
            _result.Should().BeEquivalentTo(_expectedResult);
        }
    }
}

显然这个测试很愚蠢,我们实际上是在测试我们的mock。但你懂的。您应该根据您的实现测试有意义的逻辑,例如..

如果响应的代码状态不是201,它是否应该抛出异常? 如果不能解析响应文本,应该发生什么? 等。

这个回答的目的是测试一些使用HttpClient的东西,这是一种很好的干净的方法。


更新 最近,我在测试中使用了一个http构建器,在那里我可以轻松地注入我所期望的json响应。

public class HttpClientBuilder
{
    private HttpMessageHandler _httpMessageHandler = new HttpClientHandler();
    
    public HttpClientBuilder WithJsonResponse(HttpStatusCode httpStatusCode, string json, string contentType = "application/json")
    {
        var mockHttpMessageHandler =
            new MockHttpMessageHandler(
                (request, cancellation) =>
                {
                    var responseMessage =
                        new HttpResponseMessage(httpStatusCode)
                        {
                            Content = new StringContent(json, Encoding.UTF8, contentType)
                        };
                    var result = Task.FromResult(responseMessage);
                    return result;
                });
        _httpMessageHandler = mockHttpMessageHandler;
        return this;
    }

    public HttpClient Build()
    {
        var httpClient = new HttpClient(_httpMessageHandler);
        return httpClient;
    }
}

class MockHttpMessageHandler 
    : HttpMessageHandler
{
    private readonly Func<HttpRequestMessage, CancellationToken, Task<HttpResponseMessage>> _sendAsyncFunc;

    public MockHttpMessageHandler(Func<HttpRequestMessage, CancellationToken, Task<HttpResponseMessage>> sendAsyncFunc)
    {
        _sendAsyncFunc = sendAsyncFunc;
    }

    protected override async Task<HttpResponseMessage> SendAsync(HttpRequestMessage request, CancellationToken cancellationToken)
    {
        return await _sendAsyncFunc.Invoke(request, cancellationToken);
    }
}

因此,只要我有一个抽象的HttpClient,比如IHttpClientFactory,就像我上面建议的那样,在我的测试中,我可以做一些这样的事情

var httpClientFactoryMock = new Mock<IHttpClientFactory>();
var jsonResponse = "{\"hello world\"}";
var httpClient = 
  new HttpClientBuilder()
    .WithJsonResponse(HttpStatusCode.OK, jsonResponse)
    .Build();
                
httpClientFactoryMock
  .Setup(x => x.Create())
  .Returns(httpClient);
var httpClientFactory = httpClientFactoryMock.Object;

然后使用httpClientFactory。

您的接口公开了具体的HttpClient类,因此任何使用该接口的类都被绑定到它,这意味着它不能被模拟。

HttpClient不继承任何接口,所以你必须自己编写。我建议使用类似装饰器的图案:

public interface IHttpHandler
{
    HttpResponseMessage Get(string url);
    HttpResponseMessage Post(string url, HttpContent content);
    Task<HttpResponseMessage> GetAsync(string url);
    Task<HttpResponseMessage> PostAsync(string url, HttpContent content);
}

你的类看起来是这样的:

public class HttpClientHandler : IHttpHandler
{
    private HttpClient _client = new HttpClient();

    public HttpResponseMessage Get(string url)
    {
        return GetAsync(url).Result;
    }

    public HttpResponseMessage Post(string url, HttpContent content)
    {
        return PostAsync(url, content).Result;
    }

    public async Task<HttpResponseMessage> GetAsync(string url)
    {
        return await _client.GetAsync(url);
    }

    public async Task<HttpResponseMessage> PostAsync(string url, HttpContent content)
    {
        return await _client.PostAsync(url, content);
    }
}

所有这些的重点是HttpClientHandler创建了它自己的HttpClient,然后你当然可以创建多个以不同方式实现IHttpHandler的类。

这种方法的主要问题是,你实际上是在编写一个只调用另一个类中的方法的类,然而你可以创建一个从HttpClient继承的类(参见Nkosi的例子,这是一个比我的方法更好的方法)。如果HttpClient有一个可以模拟的接口,事情会简单得多,不幸的是它没有。

This example is not the golden ticket however. IHttpHandler still relies on HttpResponseMessage, which belongs to System.Net.Http namespace, therefore if you do need other implementations other than HttpClient, you will have to perform some kind of mapping to convert their responses into HttpResponseMessage objects. This of course is only a problem if you need to use multiple implementations of IHttpHandler but it doesn't look like you do so it's not the end of the world, but it's something to think about.

无论如何,您可以简单地模拟IHttpHandler,而不必担心具体的HttpClient类,因为它已经被抽象掉了。

我建议测试非异步方法,因为这些方法仍然调用异步方法,但不必担心单元测试异步方法的麻烦,参见这里

不要有一个包装器来创建一个新的HttpClient实例。如果您这样做,您将在运行时耗尽套接字(即使您正在处理HttpClient对象)。

如果使用MOQ,正确的做法是添加使用MOQ . protected;到您的测试,然后编写如下代码:

var response = new HttpResponseMessage(HttpStatusCode.OK)
{
    Content = new StringContent("It worked!")
};
var mockHttpMessageHandler = new Mock<HttpMessageHandler>();
mockHttpMessageHandler
    .Protected()
    .Setup<Task<HttpResponseMessage>>(
        "SendAsync",
        ItExpr.IsAny<HttpRequestMessage>(),
        ItExpr.IsAny<CancellationToken>())
    .ReturnsAsync(() => response);


var httpClient = new HttpClient(mockHttpMessageHandler.Object);