我认为这样比较好:

SELECT * FROM "comments" WHERE ("comments"."id" IN (1,3,2,4))
    ORDER BY  id=1 DESC, id=3 DESC, id=2 DESC, id=4 DESC

create sequence serial start 1;

select * from comments c
join (select unnest(ARRAY[1,3,2,4]) as id, nextval('serial') as id_sorter) x
on x.id = c.id
order by x.id_sorter;

drop sequence serial;

(编辑)

Unnest在8.3中还没有内置，但你可以自己创建一个(任何的美丽*):

create function unnest(anyarray) returns setof anyelement
language sql as
$$
    select $1[i] from generate_series(array_lower($1,1),array_upper($1,1)) i;
$$;

该函数可以在任何类型下工作:

select unnest(array['John','Paul','George','Ringo']) as beatle
select unnest(array[1,3,2,4]) as id

SELECT * FROM "comments" JOIN (
  SELECT 1 as "id",1 as "order" UNION ALL 
  SELECT 3,2 UNION ALL SELECT 2,3 UNION ALL SELECT 4,4
) j ON "comments"."id" = j."id" ORDER BY j.ORDER

或者如果你喜欢恶而不是善:

SELECT * FROM "comments" WHERE ("comments"."id" IN (1,3,2,4))
ORDER BY POSITION(','+"comments"."id"+',' IN ',1,3,2,4,')

在Postgres 9.4或更高版本中，这是最简单和最快的:

SELECT c.*
FROM   comments c
JOIN   unnest('{1,3,2,4}'::int[]) WITH ORDINALITY t(id, ord) USING (id)
ORDER  BY t.ord;

WITH ORDINALITY was introduced with in Postgres 9.4. No need for a subquery, we can use the set-returning function like a table directly. (A.k.a. "table-function".) A string literal to hand in the array instead of an ARRAY constructor may be easier to implement with some clients. For convenience (optionally), copy the column name we are joining to ("id" in the example), so we can join with a short USING clause to only get a single instance of the join column in the result. Works with any input type. If your key column is of type text, provide something like '{foo,bar,baz}'::text[].

详细解释:

PostgreSQL unnest()与元素号

在Postgres中另一种方法是使用idx函数。

SELECT *
FROM comments
ORDER BY idx(array[1,3,2,4], comments.id)

不要忘记首先创建idx函数，如下所述:http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Array_Index

这里有另一个解决方案，它使用了一个常量表(http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/interactive/sql-values.html):)

SELECT * FROM comments AS c,
(VALUES (1,1),(3,2),(2,3),(4,4) ) AS t (ord_id,ord)
WHERE (c.id IN (1,3,2,4)) AND (c.id = t.ord_id)
ORDER BY ord

但我不确定这是表现性的。

我现在有一堆答案了。我可以得到一些投票和评论，这样我就知道哪一个是赢家!

谢谢大家:-)