我对Java比较陌生,经常发现需要对值进行Map<Key,Value>排序。
由于这些值不是唯一的,我发现自己将keySet转换为一个数组,并使用自定义比较器通过数组排序对该数组进行排序,该比较器根据与该键关联的值进行排序。
有没有更简单的方法?
我对Java比较陌生,经常发现需要对值进行Map<Key,Value>排序。
由于这些值不是唯一的,我发现自己将keySet转换为一个数组,并使用自定义比较器通过数组排序对该数组进行排序,该比较器根据与该键关联的值进行排序。
有没有更简单的方法?
当前回答
用Java中最简单的方式对任何Hashmap进行排序。我们不需要将其存储在树图、列表等中。
在这里,我将使用Java Streams:
让我们按其值(升序)对该地图进行排序
Map<String, Integer> mp= new HashMap<>();
mp.put("zebra", 1);
mp.put("blossom", 2);
mp.put("gemini", 3);
mp.put("opera", 7);
mp.put("adelaide", 10);
Map<String, Integer> resultMap= mp.entrySet().stream().sorted(Map.Entry.<String, Integer>comparingByValue()).collect(Collectors.toMap(Map.Entry::getKey, Map.Entry::getValue,(e1, e2) -> e1, LinkedHashMap::new));
现在,您可以通过多种方式打印排序后的resultMap,例如使用高级for循环或迭代器。
上面的映射也可以按值的降序排序
Map<String, Integer> resultMap= mp.entrySet().stream().sorted(Map.Entry.<String, Integer>comparingByValue().reversed()).collect(Collectors.toMap(Map.Entry::getKey, Map.Entry::getValue,(e1, e2) -> e1, LinkedHashMap::new));
现在让我们来看另一个场景,我们将“User”存储在地图中,并根据“User”的“name”按升序(词典)对其进行排序:
User u1= new User("hi", 135);
User u2= new User("bismuth", 900);
User u3= new User("alloy", 675);
User u4= new User("jupiter", 342);
User u5= new User("lily", 941);
Map<String, User> map2= new HashMap<>();
map2.put("zebra", u3);
map2.put("blossom", u5);
map2.put("gemini", u1);
map2.put("opera", u2);
map2.put("adelaide", u4);
Map<String, User> resultMap=
map2.entrySet().stream().sorted(Map.Entry.<String, User>comparingByValue( (User o1, User o2)-> o1.getName().compareTo(o2.getName()))).collect(Collectors.toMap(Map.Entry::getKey, Map.Entry::getValue,(e1, e2) -> e2, LinkedHashMap::new));
class User
{
String name;
int id;
public User(String name, int id) {
super();
this.name = name;
this.id = id;
}
public String getName() {
return name;
}
public void setName(String name) {
this.name = name;
}
public int getId() {
return id;
}
public void setId(int id) {
this.id = id;
}
@Override
public String toString() {
return "User [name=" + name + ", id=" + id + "]";
}
@Override
public int hashCode() {
final int prime = 31;
int result = 1;
result = prime * result + id;
result = prime * result + ((name == null) ? 0 : name.hashCode());
return result;
}
@Override
public boolean equals(Object obj) {
if (this == obj)
return true;
if (obj == null)
return false;
if (getClass() != obj.getClass())
return false;
User other = (User) obj;
if (id != other.id)
return false;
if (name == null) {
if (other.name != null)
return false;
} else if (!name.equals(other.name))
return false;
return true;
}
}
其他回答
对于Java 8,您可以使用streams api以一种明显不那么冗长的方式来实现:
Map<K, V> sortedMap = map.entrySet().stream()
.sorted(Entry.comparingByValue())
.collect(Collectors.toMap(Entry::getKey, Entry::getValue, (e1, e2) -> e1, LinkedHashMap::new));
基于@devinmore代码,一种使用泛型并支持升序和降序排序的map排序方法。
/**
* Sort a map by it's keys in ascending order.
*
* @return new instance of {@link LinkedHashMap} contained sorted entries of supplied map.
* @author Maxim Veksler
*/
public static <K, V> LinkedHashMap<K, V> sortMapByKey(final Map<K, V> map) {
return sortMapByKey(map, SortingOrder.ASCENDING);
}
/**
* Sort a map by it's values in ascending order.
*
* @return new instance of {@link LinkedHashMap} contained sorted entries of supplied map.
* @author Maxim Veksler
*/
public static <K, V> LinkedHashMap<K, V> sortMapByValue(final Map<K, V> map) {
return sortMapByValue(map, SortingOrder.ASCENDING);
}
/**
* Sort a map by it's keys.
*
* @param sortingOrder {@link SortingOrder} enum specifying requested sorting order.
* @return new instance of {@link LinkedHashMap} contained sorted entries of supplied map.
* @author Maxim Veksler
*/
public static <K, V> LinkedHashMap<K, V> sortMapByKey(final Map<K, V> map, final SortingOrder sortingOrder) {
Comparator<Map.Entry<K, V>> comparator = new Comparator<Entry<K,V>>() {
public int compare(Entry<K, V> o1, Entry<K, V> o2) {
return comparableCompare(o1.getKey(), o2.getKey(), sortingOrder);
}
};
return sortMap(map, comparator);
}
/**
* Sort a map by it's values.
*
* @param sortingOrder {@link SortingOrder} enum specifying requested sorting order.
* @return new instance of {@link LinkedHashMap} contained sorted entries of supplied map.
* @author Maxim Veksler
*/
public static <K, V> LinkedHashMap<K, V> sortMapByValue(final Map<K, V> map, final SortingOrder sortingOrder) {
Comparator<Map.Entry<K, V>> comparator = new Comparator<Entry<K,V>>() {
public int compare(Entry<K, V> o1, Entry<K, V> o2) {
return comparableCompare(o1.getValue(), o2.getValue(), sortingOrder);
}
};
return sortMap(map, comparator);
}
@SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
private static <T> int comparableCompare(T o1, T o2, SortingOrder sortingOrder) {
int compare = ((Comparable<T>)o1).compareTo(o2);
switch (sortingOrder) {
case ASCENDING:
return compare;
case DESCENDING:
return (-1) * compare;
}
return 0;
}
/**
* Sort a map by supplied comparator logic.
*
* @return new instance of {@link LinkedHashMap} contained sorted entries of supplied map.
* @author Maxim Veksler
*/
public static <K, V> LinkedHashMap<K, V> sortMap(final Map<K, V> map, final Comparator<Map.Entry<K, V>> comparator) {
// Convert the map into a list of key,value pairs.
List<Map.Entry<K, V>> mapEntries = new LinkedList<Map.Entry<K, V>>(map.entrySet());
// Sort the converted list according to supplied comparator.
Collections.sort(mapEntries, comparator);
// Build a new ordered map, containing the same entries as the old map.
LinkedHashMap<K, V> result = new LinkedHashMap<K, V>(map.size() + (map.size() / 20));
for(Map.Entry<K, V> entry : mapEntries) {
// We iterate on the mapEntries list which is sorted by the comparator putting new entries into
// the targeted result which is a sorted map.
result.put(entry.getKey(), entry.getValue());
}
return result;
}
/**
* Sorting order enum, specifying request result sort behavior.
* @author Maxim Veksler
*
*/
public static enum SortingOrder {
/**
* Resulting sort will be from smaller to biggest.
*/
ASCENDING,
/**
* Resulting sort will be from biggest to smallest.
*/
DESCENDING
}
当然,Stephen的解决方案真的很棒,但对于那些不会使用Guava的人来说:
这是我的解决方案,用于按值对地图进行排序。此解决方案处理两倍相同值等情况。。。
// If you want to sort a map by value, and if there can be twice the same value:
// here is your original map
Map<String,Integer> mapToSortByValue = new HashMap<String, Integer>();
mapToSortByValue.put("A", 3);
mapToSortByValue.put("B", 1);
mapToSortByValue.put("C", 3);
mapToSortByValue.put("D", 5);
mapToSortByValue.put("E", -1);
mapToSortByValue.put("F", 1000);
mapToSortByValue.put("G", 79);
mapToSortByValue.put("H", 15);
// Sort all the map entries by value
Set<Map.Entry<String,Integer>> set = new TreeSet<Map.Entry<String,Integer>>(
new Comparator<Map.Entry<String,Integer>>(){
@Override
public int compare(Map.Entry<String,Integer> obj1, Map.Entry<String,Integer> obj2) {
Integer val1 = obj1.getValue();
Integer val2 = obj2.getValue();
// DUPLICATE VALUE CASE
// If the values are equals, we can't return 0 because the 2 entries would be considered
// as equals and one of them would be deleted (because we use a set, no duplicate, remember!)
int compareValues = val1.compareTo(val2);
if ( compareValues == 0 ) {
String key1 = obj1.getKey();
String key2 = obj2.getKey();
int compareKeys = key1.compareTo(key2);
if ( compareKeys == 0 ) {
// what you return here will tell us if you keep REAL KEY-VALUE duplicates in your set
// if you want to, do whatever you want but do not return 0 (but don't break the comparator contract!)
return 0;
}
return compareKeys;
}
return compareValues;
}
}
);
set.addAll(mapToSortByValue.entrySet());
// OK NOW OUR SET IS SORTED COOL!!!!
// And there's nothing more to do: the entries are sorted by value!
for ( Map.Entry<String,Integer> entry : set ) {
System.out.println("Set entries: " + entry.getKey() + " -> " + entry.getValue());
}
// But if you add them to an hashmap
Map<String,Integer> myMap = new HashMap<String,Integer>();
// When iterating over the set the order is still good in the println...
for ( Map.Entry<String,Integer> entry : set ) {
System.out.println("Added to result map entries: " + entry.getKey() + " " + entry.getValue());
myMap.put(entry.getKey(), entry.getValue());
}
// But once they are in the hashmap, the order is not kept!
for ( Integer value : myMap.values() ) {
System.out.println("Result map values: " + value);
}
// Also this way doesn't work:
// Logic because the entryset is a hashset for hashmaps and not a treeset
// (and even if it was a treeset, it would be on the keys only)
for ( Map.Entry<String,Integer> entry : myMap.entrySet() ) {
System.out.println("Result map entries: " + entry.getKey() + " -> " + entry.getValue());
}
// CONCLUSION:
// If you want to iterate on a map ordered by value, you need to remember:
// 1) Maps are only sorted by keys, so you can't sort them directly by value
// 2) So you simply CAN'T return a map to a sortMapByValue function
// 3) You can't reverse the keys and the values because you have duplicate values
// This also means you can't neither use Guava/Commons bidirectionnal treemaps or stuff like that
// SOLUTIONS
// So you can:
// 1) only sort the values which is easy, but you loose the key/value link (since you have duplicate values)
// 2) sort the map entries, but don't forget to handle the duplicate value case (like i did)
// 3) if you really need to return a map, use a LinkedHashMap which keep the insertion order
执行官:http://www.ideone.com/dq3Lu
输出:
Set entries: E -> -1
Set entries: B -> 1
Set entries: A -> 3
Set entries: C -> 3
Set entries: D -> 5
Set entries: H -> 15
Set entries: G -> 79
Set entries: F -> 1000
Added to result map entries: E -1
Added to result map entries: B 1
Added to result map entries: A 3
Added to result map entries: C 3
Added to result map entries: D 5
Added to result map entries: H 15
Added to result map entries: G 79
Added to result map entries: F 1000
Result map values: 5
Result map values: -1
Result map values: 1000
Result map values: 79
Result map values: 3
Result map values: 1
Result map values: 3
Result map values: 15
Result map entries: D -> 5
Result map entries: E -> -1
Result map entries: F -> 1000
Result map entries: G -> 79
Result map entries: A -> 3
Result map entries: B -> 1
Result map entries: C -> 3
Result map entries: H -> 15
希望它能帮助一些人
如果倾向于使用一个Map数据结构,该结构可以按值进行固有排序,而不必触发任何排序方法或显式传递给实用程序,则以下解决方案可能适用:
(1) org.rools.chance.core.util.ValueSortedMap(JBoss项目)在内部维护两个映射,一个用于查找,另一个用于维护排序值。与之前添加的答案非常相似,但可能是抽象和封装部分(包括复制机制)使其更安全地从外部使用。
(2) http://techblog.molindo.at/2008/11/java-map-sorted-by-value.html避免维护两个映射,而是依赖/扩展Apache Common的LinkedMap。(博客作者注:这里的所有代码都在公共领域):
// required to access LinkEntry.before and LinkEntry.after
package org.apache.commons.collections.map;
// SNIP: imports
/**
* map implementation based on LinkedMap that maintains a sorted list of
* values for iteration
*/
public class ValueSortedHashMap extends LinkedMap {
private final boolean _asc;
// don't use super()!
public ValueSortedHashMap(final boolean asc) {
super(DEFAULT_CAPACITY);
_asc = asc;
}
// SNIP: some more constructors with initial capacity and the like
protected void addEntry(final HashEntry entry, final int hashIndex) {
final LinkEntry link = (LinkEntry) entry;
insertSorted(link);
data[hashIndex] = entry;
}
protected void updateEntry(final HashEntry entry, final Object newValue) {
entry.setValue(newValue);
final LinkEntry link = (LinkEntry) entry;
link.before.after = link.after;
link.after.before = link.before;
link.after = link.before = null;
insertSorted(link);
}
private void insertSorted(final LinkEntry link) {
LinkEntry cur = header;
// iterate whole list, could (should?) be replaced with quicksearch
// start at end to optimize speed for in-order insertions
while ((cur = cur.before) != header & amp; & amp; !insertAfter(cur, link)) {}
link.after = cur.after;
link.before = cur;
cur.after.before = link;
cur.after = link;
}
protected boolean insertAfter(final LinkEntry cur, final LinkEntry link) {
if (_asc) {
return ((Comparable) cur.getValue())
.compareTo((V) link.getValue()) & lt; = 0;
} else {
return ((Comparable) cur.getValue())
.compareTo((V) link.getValue()) & gt; = 0;
}
}
public boolean isAscending() {
return _asc;
}
}
(3) 编写一个自定义映射或从LinkedHashMap扩展,该映射仅在枚举期间根据需要进行排序(例如,values()、keyset()、entryset())。内部实现/行为是从使用该类的实现/行为中抽象出来的,但在该类的客户端看来,当请求枚举时,值总是被排序的。如果所有的put操作都在枚举之前完成,这个类希望排序只发生一次。排序方法采用了前面对这个问题的一些回答。
public class SortByValueMap<K, V> implements Map<K, V> {
private boolean isSortingNeeded = false;
private final Map<K, V> map = new LinkedHashMap<>();
@Override
public V put(K key, V value) {
isSortingNeeded = true;
return map.put(key, value);
}
@Override
public void putAll(Map<? extends K, ? extends V> map) {
isSortingNeeded = true;
map.putAll(map);
}
@Override
public Set<K> keySet() {
sort();
return map.keySet();
}
@Override
public Set<Entry<K, V>> entrySet() {
sort();
return map.entrySet();
}
@Override
public Collection<V> values() {
sort();
return map.values();
}
private void sort() {
if (!isSortingNeeded) {
return;
}
List<Entry<K, V>> list = new ArrayList<>(size());
for (Iterator<Map.Entry<K, V>> it = map.entrySet().iterator(); it.hasNext();) {
Map.Entry<K, V> entry = it.next();
list.add(entry);
it.remove();
}
Collections.sort(list);
for (Entry<K, V> entry : list) {
map.put(entry.getKey(), entry.getValue());
}
isSortingNeeded = false;
}
@Override
public String toString() {
sort();
return map.toString();
}
}
(4) Guava提供了ImmutableMap.Builder.orderEntriesByValue(Comparator valueComparator),尽管生成的映射是不可变的:
将此生成器配置为根据指定的比较器。排序顺序是稳定的,也就是说,如果两个条目的值作为等价项进行比较,首先插入的条目将是第一个按照构建映射的迭代顺序。
对键进行排序需要Comparator为每个比较查找每个值。一个更具可扩展性的解决方案将直接使用entrySet,因为这样每次比较都会立即获得该值(尽管我没有用数字来支持)。
这是这样一件事的通用版本:
public static <K, V extends Comparable<? super V>> List<K> getKeysSortedByValue(Map<K, V> map) {
final int size = map.size();
final List<Map.Entry<K, V>> list = new ArrayList<Map.Entry<K, V>>(size);
list.addAll(map.entrySet());
final ValueComparator<V> cmp = new ValueComparator<V>();
Collections.sort(list, cmp);
final List<K> keys = new ArrayList<K>(size);
for (int i = 0; i < size; i++) {
keys.set(i, list.get(i).getKey());
}
return keys;
}
private static final class ValueComparator<V extends Comparable<? super V>>
implements Comparator<Map.Entry<?, V>> {
public int compare(Map.Entry<?, V> o1, Map.Entry<?, V> o2) {
return o1.getValue().compareTo(o2.getValue());
}
}
有一些方法可以减少上述解决方案的内存旋转。例如,创建的第一个ArrayList可以重新用作返回值;这将需要抑制一些泛型警告,但对于可重用的库代码来说,这可能是值得的。此外,Comparator不必在每次调用时重新分配。
这里有一个更有效但不太吸引人的版本:
public static <K, V extends Comparable<? super V>> List<K> getKeysSortedByValue2(Map<K, V> map) {
final int size = map.size();
final List reusedList = new ArrayList(size);
final List<Map.Entry<K, V>> meView = reusedList;
meView.addAll(map.entrySet());
Collections.sort(meView, SINGLE);
final List<K> keyView = reusedList;
for (int i = 0; i < size; i++) {
keyView.set(i, meView.get(i).getKey());
}
return keyView;
}
private static final Comparator SINGLE = new ValueComparator();
最后,如果您需要连续访问已排序的信息(而不是偶尔排序一次),可以使用额外的多重映射。如果你需要更多细节,请告诉我。。。