我对Java比较陌生,经常发现需要对值进行Map<Key,Value>排序。
由于这些值不是唯一的,我发现自己将keySet转换为一个数组,并使用自定义比较器通过数组排序对该数组进行排序,该比较器根据与该键关联的值进行排序。
有没有更简单的方法?
我对Java比较陌生,经常发现需要对值进行Map<Key,Value>排序。
由于这些值不是唯一的,我发现自己将keySet转换为一个数组,并使用自定义比较器通过数组排序对该数组进行排序,该比较器根据与该键关联的值进行排序。
有没有更简单的方法?
当前回答
static <K extends Comparable<? super K>, V extends Comparable<? super V>>
Map sortByValueInDescendingOrder(final Map<K, V> map) {
Map re = new TreeMap(new Comparator<K>() {
@Override
public int compare(K o1, K o2) {
if (map.get(o1) == null || map.get(o2) == null) {
return -o1.compareTo(o2);
}
int result = -map.get(o1).compareTo(map.get(o2));
if (result != 0) {
return result;
}
return -o1.compareTo(o2);
}
});
re.putAll(map);
return re;
}
@Test(timeout = 3000l, expected = Test.None.class)
public void testSortByValueInDescendingOrder() {
char[] arr = "googler".toCharArray();
Map<Character, Integer> charToTimes = new HashMap();
for (int i = 0; i < arr.length; i++) {
Integer times = charToTimes.get(arr[i]);
charToTimes.put(arr[i], times == null ? 1 : times + 1);
}
Map sortedByTimes = sortByValueInDescendingOrder(charToTimes);
Assert.assertEquals(charToTimes.toString(), "{g=2, e=1, r=1, o=2, l=1}");
Assert.assertEquals(sortedByTimes.toString(), "{o=2, g=2, r=1, l=1, e=1}");
Assert.assertEquals(sortedByTimes.containsKey('a'), false);
Assert.assertEquals(sortedByTimes.get('a'), null);
Assert.assertEquals(sortedByTimes.get('g'), 2);
Assert.assertEquals(sortedByTimes.equals(charToTimes), true);
}
其他回答
public class Test {
public static void main(String[] args) {
TreeMap<Integer, String> hm=new TreeMap();
hm.put(3, "arun singh");
hm.put(5, "vinay singh");
hm.put(1, "bandagi singh");
hm.put(6, "vikram singh");
hm.put(2, "panipat singh");
hm.put(28, "jakarta singh");
ArrayList<String> al=new ArrayList(hm.values());
Collections.sort(al, new myComparator());
System.out.println("//sort by values \n");
for(String obj: al){
for(Map.Entry<Integer, String> map2:hm.entrySet()){
if(map2.getValue().equals(obj)){
System.out.println(map2.getKey()+" "+map2.getValue());
}
}
}
}
}
class myComparator implements Comparator{
@Override
public int compare(Object o1, Object o2) {
String o3=(String) o1;
String o4 =(String) o2;
return o3.compareTo(o4);
}
}
输出,输出=
//sort by values
3 arun singh
1 bandagi singh
28 jakarta singh
2 panipat singh
6 vikram singh
5 vinay singh
由于TreeMap<>不适用于可以相等的值,因此我使用了以下方法:
private <K, V extends Comparable<? super V>> List<Entry<K, V>> sort(Map<K, V> map) {
List<Map.Entry<K, V>> list = new LinkedList<Map.Entry<K, V>>(map.entrySet());
Collections.sort(list, new Comparator<Map.Entry<K, V>>() {
public int compare(Map.Entry<K, V> o1, Map.Entry<K, V> o2) {
return o1.getValue().compareTo(o2.getValue());
}
});
return list;
}
您可能希望将列表放在LinkedHashMap中,但若您只打算立即对其进行迭代,那个么这是多余的。。。
当你有两个相等的项目时,投票给最多的答案不起作用。TreeMap保留相等的值。
示例:未排序地图
key/value: D/67.3 key/value: A/99.5 key/value: B/67.4 key/value: C/67.5 key/value: E/99.5
后果
key/value: A/99.5 key/value: C/67.5 key/value: B/67.4 key/value: D/67.3
所以省略了E!!
对我来说,它可以很好地调整比较器,如果它等于,则不返回0,而是返回-1。
在示例中:
类ValueComparator实现Comparator{地图库;公共ValueComparator(地图库){this.base=基数;}public int compare(对象a,对象b){如果((双)base.get(a)<(双)base.get(b)){返回1;}否则如果((双)base.get(a)==(双)base.get(b)){返回-1;}其他{返回-1;}}}
现在它返回:
未排序地图:
key/value: D/67.3 key/value: A/99.5 key/value: B/67.4 key/value: C/67.5 key/value: E/99.5
结果:
key/value: A/99.5 key/value: E/99.5 key/value: C/67.5 key/value: B/67.4 key/value: D/67.3
作为对《外国人》的回应(2011年11月22日):我将此解决方案用于整数Id和名称的映射,但想法是相同的,因此上面的代码可能不正确(我将在测试中编写并给您正确的代码),这是基于上面解决方案的map排序代码:
package nl.iamit.util;
import java.util.Comparator;
import java.util.Map;
public class Comparators {
public static class MapIntegerStringComparator implements Comparator {
Map<Integer, String> base;
public MapIntegerStringComparator(Map<Integer, String> base) {
this.base = base;
}
public int compare(Object a, Object b) {
int compare = ((String) base.get(a))
.compareTo((String) base.get(b));
if (compare == 0) {
return -1;
}
return compare;
}
}
}
这是测试类(我刚刚测试了它,这适用于Integer,StringMap:
package test.nl.iamit.util;
import java.util.HashMap;
import java.util.TreeMap;
import nl.iamit.util.Comparators;
import org.junit.Test;
import static org.junit.Assert.assertArrayEquals;
public class TestComparators {
@Test
public void testMapIntegerStringComparator(){
HashMap<Integer, String> unSoretedMap = new HashMap<Integer, String>();
Comparators.MapIntegerStringComparator bvc = new Comparators.MapIntegerStringComparator(
unSoretedMap);
TreeMap<Integer, String> sorted_map = new TreeMap<Integer, String>(bvc);
//the testdata:
unSoretedMap.put(new Integer(1), "E");
unSoretedMap.put(new Integer(2), "A");
unSoretedMap.put(new Integer(3), "E");
unSoretedMap.put(new Integer(4), "B");
unSoretedMap.put(new Integer(5), "F");
sorted_map.putAll(unSoretedMap);
Object[] targetKeys={new Integer(2),new Integer(4),new Integer(3),new Integer(1),new Integer(5) };
Object[] currecntKeys=sorted_map.keySet().toArray();
assertArrayEquals(targetKeys,currecntKeys);
}
}
以下是地图比较器的代码:
public static class MapStringDoubleComparator implements Comparator {
Map<String, Double> base;
public MapStringDoubleComparator(Map<String, Double> base) {
this.base = base;
}
//note if you want decending in stead of ascending, turn around 1 and -1
public int compare(Object a, Object b) {
if ((Double) base.get(a) == (Double) base.get(b)) {
return 0;
} else if((Double) base.get(a) < (Double) base.get(b)) {
return -1;
}else{
return 1;
}
}
}
这是一个测试用例:
@Test
public void testMapStringDoubleComparator(){
HashMap<String, Double> unSoretedMap = new HashMap<String, Double>();
Comparators.MapStringDoubleComparator bvc = new Comparators.MapStringDoubleComparator(
unSoretedMap);
TreeMap<String, Double> sorted_map = new TreeMap<String, Double>(bvc);
//the testdata:
unSoretedMap.put("D",new Double(67.3));
unSoretedMap.put("A",new Double(99.5));
unSoretedMap.put("B",new Double(67.4));
unSoretedMap.put("C",new Double(67.5));
unSoretedMap.put("E",new Double(99.5));
sorted_map.putAll(unSoretedMap);
Object[] targetKeys={"D","B","C","E","A"};
Object[] currecntKeys=sorted_map.keySet().toArray();
assertArrayEquals(targetKeys,currecntKeys);
}
当然,你可以让它更通用,但我只需要一个案例(地图)
这是Anthony答案的变体,如果存在重复值,则该答案无效:
public static <K, V extends Comparable<V>> Map<K, V> sortMapByValues(final Map<K, V> map) {
Comparator<K> valueComparator = new Comparator<K>() {
public int compare(K k1, K k2) {
final V v1 = map.get(k1);
final V v2 = map.get(k2);
/* Not sure how to handle nulls ... */
if (v1 == null) {
return (v2 == null) ? 0 : 1;
}
int compare = v2.compareTo(v1);
if (compare != 0)
{
return compare;
}
else
{
Integer h1 = k1.hashCode();
Integer h2 = k2.hashCode();
return h2.compareTo(h1);
}
}
};
Map<K, V> sortedByValues = new TreeMap<K, V>(valueComparator);
sortedByValues.putAll(map);
return sortedByValues;
}
注意,如何处理空值还很难说。
这种方法的一个重要优点是它实际上返回了一个Map,这与这里提供的其他解决方案不同。
基于@devinmore代码,一种使用泛型并支持升序和降序排序的map排序方法。
/**
* Sort a map by it's keys in ascending order.
*
* @return new instance of {@link LinkedHashMap} contained sorted entries of supplied map.
* @author Maxim Veksler
*/
public static <K, V> LinkedHashMap<K, V> sortMapByKey(final Map<K, V> map) {
return sortMapByKey(map, SortingOrder.ASCENDING);
}
/**
* Sort a map by it's values in ascending order.
*
* @return new instance of {@link LinkedHashMap} contained sorted entries of supplied map.
* @author Maxim Veksler
*/
public static <K, V> LinkedHashMap<K, V> sortMapByValue(final Map<K, V> map) {
return sortMapByValue(map, SortingOrder.ASCENDING);
}
/**
* Sort a map by it's keys.
*
* @param sortingOrder {@link SortingOrder} enum specifying requested sorting order.
* @return new instance of {@link LinkedHashMap} contained sorted entries of supplied map.
* @author Maxim Veksler
*/
public static <K, V> LinkedHashMap<K, V> sortMapByKey(final Map<K, V> map, final SortingOrder sortingOrder) {
Comparator<Map.Entry<K, V>> comparator = new Comparator<Entry<K,V>>() {
public int compare(Entry<K, V> o1, Entry<K, V> o2) {
return comparableCompare(o1.getKey(), o2.getKey(), sortingOrder);
}
};
return sortMap(map, comparator);
}
/**
* Sort a map by it's values.
*
* @param sortingOrder {@link SortingOrder} enum specifying requested sorting order.
* @return new instance of {@link LinkedHashMap} contained sorted entries of supplied map.
* @author Maxim Veksler
*/
public static <K, V> LinkedHashMap<K, V> sortMapByValue(final Map<K, V> map, final SortingOrder sortingOrder) {
Comparator<Map.Entry<K, V>> comparator = new Comparator<Entry<K,V>>() {
public int compare(Entry<K, V> o1, Entry<K, V> o2) {
return comparableCompare(o1.getValue(), o2.getValue(), sortingOrder);
}
};
return sortMap(map, comparator);
}
@SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
private static <T> int comparableCompare(T o1, T o2, SortingOrder sortingOrder) {
int compare = ((Comparable<T>)o1).compareTo(o2);
switch (sortingOrder) {
case ASCENDING:
return compare;
case DESCENDING:
return (-1) * compare;
}
return 0;
}
/**
* Sort a map by supplied comparator logic.
*
* @return new instance of {@link LinkedHashMap} contained sorted entries of supplied map.
* @author Maxim Veksler
*/
public static <K, V> LinkedHashMap<K, V> sortMap(final Map<K, V> map, final Comparator<Map.Entry<K, V>> comparator) {
// Convert the map into a list of key,value pairs.
List<Map.Entry<K, V>> mapEntries = new LinkedList<Map.Entry<K, V>>(map.entrySet());
// Sort the converted list according to supplied comparator.
Collections.sort(mapEntries, comparator);
// Build a new ordered map, containing the same entries as the old map.
LinkedHashMap<K, V> result = new LinkedHashMap<K, V>(map.size() + (map.size() / 20));
for(Map.Entry<K, V> entry : mapEntries) {
// We iterate on the mapEntries list which is sorted by the comparator putting new entries into
// the targeted result which is a sorted map.
result.put(entry.getKey(), entry.getValue());
}
return result;
}
/**
* Sorting order enum, specifying request result sort behavior.
* @author Maxim Veksler
*
*/
public static enum SortingOrder {
/**
* Resulting sort will be from smaller to biggest.
*/
ASCENDING,
/**
* Resulting sort will be from biggest to smallest.
*/
DESCENDING
}