我对Java比较陌生,经常发现需要对值进行Map<Key,Value>排序。
由于这些值不是唯一的,我发现自己将keySet转换为一个数组,并使用自定义比较器通过数组排序对该数组进行排序,该比较器根据与该键关联的值进行排序。
有没有更简单的方法?
我对Java比较陌生,经常发现需要对值进行Map<Key,Value>排序。
由于这些值不是唯一的,我发现自己将keySet转换为一个数组,并使用自定义比较器通过数组排序对该数组进行排序,该比较器根据与该键关联的值进行排序。
有没有更简单的方法?
当前回答
当我面对这个问题时,我只是在旁边创建一个列表。如果您将它们放在一个自定义的Map实现中,它会有一种很好的感觉……您可以使用类似以下的方式,仅在需要时执行排序。(注意:我还没有真正测试过这个,但它可以编译……可能是某个地方的一个愚蠢的小bug)
(如果您希望按键和值对其进行排序,请让类扩展TreeMap,不要定义访问器方法,并让赋值函数调用super.xxxxx而不是map_.xxxx)
package com.javadude.sample;
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.Collection;
import java.util.Collections;
import java.util.Comparator;
import java.util.HashMap;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.Map;
import java.util.Set;
public class SortedValueHashMap<K, V> implements Map<K, V> {
private Map<K, V> map_ = new HashMap<K, V>();
private List<V> valueList_ = new ArrayList<V>();
private boolean needsSort_ = false;
private Comparator<V> comparator_;
public SortedValueHashMap() {
}
public SortedValueHashMap(List<V> valueList) {
valueList_ = valueList;
}
public List<V> sortedValues() {
if (needsSort_) {
needsSort_ = false;
Collections.sort(valueList_, comparator_);
}
return valueList_;
}
// mutators
public void clear() {
map_.clear();
valueList_.clear();
needsSort_ = false;
}
public V put(K key, V value) {
valueList_.add(value);
needsSort_ = true;
return map_.put(key, value);
}
public void putAll(Map<? extends K, ? extends V> m) {
map_.putAll(m);
valueList_.addAll(m.values());
needsSort_ = true;
}
public V remove(Object key) {
V value = map_.remove(key);
valueList_.remove(value);
return value;
}
// accessors
public boolean containsKey(Object key) { return map_.containsKey(key); }
public boolean containsValue(Object value) { return map_.containsValue(value); }
public Set<java.util.Map.Entry<K, V>> entrySet() { return map_.entrySet(); }
public boolean equals(Object o) { return map_.equals(o); }
public V get(Object key) { return map_.get(key); }
public int hashCode() { return map_.hashCode(); }
public boolean isEmpty() { return map_.isEmpty(); }
public Set<K> keySet() { return map_.keySet(); }
public int size() { return map_.size(); }
public Collection<V> values() { return map_.values(); }
}
其他回答
我重写了devinmore的方法,该方法在不使用迭代器的情况下,根据地图的值对其进行排序:
public static Map<K, V> sortMapByValue(Map<K, V> inputMap) {
Set<Entry<K, V>> set = inputMap.entrySet();
List<Entry<K, V>> list = new ArrayList<Entry<K, V>>(set);
Collections.sort(list, new Comparator<Map.Entry<K, V>>()
{
@Override
public int compare(Entry<K, V> o1, Entry<K, V> o2) {
return (o1.getValue()).compareTo( o2.getValue() ); //Ascending order
}
} );
Map<K, V> sortedMap = new LinkedHashMap<>();
for(Map.Entry<K, V> entry : list){
sortedMap.put(entry.getKey(), entry.getValue());
}
return sortedMap;
}
注意:我们使用LinkedHashMap作为输出映射,因为我们的列表已经按值排序,现在我们应该按照插入键值的顺序将列表存储到输出映射中。因此,如果您使用例如TreeMap作为输出地图,您的地图将再次按地图键排序!
这是主要方法:
public static void main(String[] args) {
Map<String, String> map = new HashMap<>();
map.put("3", "three");
map.put("1", "one");
map.put("5", "five");
System.out.println("Input Map:" + map);
System.out.println("Sorted Map:" + sortMapByValue(map));
}
最后,这是输出:
Input Map:{1=one, 3=three, 5=five}
Sorted Map:{5=five, 1=one, 3=three}
我合并了user157196和Carter Page的解决方案:
class MapUtil {
public static <K, V extends Comparable<? super V>> Map<K, V> sortByValue( Map<K, V> map ){
ValueComparator<K,V> bvc = new ValueComparator<K,V>(map);
TreeMap<K,V> sorted_map = new TreeMap<K,V>(bvc);
sorted_map.putAll(map);
return sorted_map;
}
}
class ValueComparator<K, V extends Comparable<? super V>> implements Comparator<K> {
Map<K, V> base;
public ValueComparator(Map<K, V> base) {
this.base = base;
}
public int compare(K a, K b) {
int result = (base.get(a).compareTo(base.get(b)));
if (result == 0) result=1;
// returning 0 would merge keys
return result;
}
}
在Java 8及以上版本中对任何地图进行排序的简单方法
Map<String, Object> mapToSort = new HashMap<>();
List<Map.Entry<String, Object>> list = new LinkedList<>(mapToSort.entrySet());
Collections.sort(list, Comparator.comparing(o -> o.getValue().getAttribute()));
HashMap<String, Object> sortedMap = new LinkedHashMap<>();
for (Map.Entry<String, Object> map : list) {
sortedMap.put(map.getKey(), map.getValue());
}
如果您使用的是Java 7及以下版本
Map<String, Object> mapToSort = new HashMap<>();
List<Map.Entry<String, Object>> list = new LinkedList<>(mapToSort.entrySet());
Collections.sort(list, new Comparator<Map.Entry<String, Object>>() {
@Override
public int compare(Map.Entry<String, Object> o1, Map.Entry<String, Object> o2) {
return o1.getValue().getAttribute().compareTo(o2.getValue().getAttribute());
}
});
HashMap<String, Object> sortedMap = new LinkedHashMap<>();
for (Map.Entry<String, Object> map : list) {
sortedMap.put(map.getKey(), map.getValue());
}
当你有两个相等的项目时,投票给最多的答案不起作用。TreeMap保留相等的值。
示例:未排序地图
key/value: D/67.3 key/value: A/99.5 key/value: B/67.4 key/value: C/67.5 key/value: E/99.5
后果
key/value: A/99.5 key/value: C/67.5 key/value: B/67.4 key/value: D/67.3
所以省略了E!!
对我来说,它可以很好地调整比较器,如果它等于,则不返回0,而是返回-1。
在示例中:
类ValueComparator实现Comparator{地图库;公共ValueComparator(地图库){this.base=基数;}public int compare(对象a,对象b){如果((双)base.get(a)<(双)base.get(b)){返回1;}否则如果((双)base.get(a)==(双)base.get(b)){返回-1;}其他{返回-1;}}}
现在它返回:
未排序地图:
key/value: D/67.3 key/value: A/99.5 key/value: B/67.4 key/value: C/67.5 key/value: E/99.5
结果:
key/value: A/99.5 key/value: E/99.5 key/value: C/67.5 key/value: B/67.4 key/value: D/67.3
作为对《外国人》的回应(2011年11月22日):我将此解决方案用于整数Id和名称的映射,但想法是相同的,因此上面的代码可能不正确(我将在测试中编写并给您正确的代码),这是基于上面解决方案的map排序代码:
package nl.iamit.util;
import java.util.Comparator;
import java.util.Map;
public class Comparators {
public static class MapIntegerStringComparator implements Comparator {
Map<Integer, String> base;
public MapIntegerStringComparator(Map<Integer, String> base) {
this.base = base;
}
public int compare(Object a, Object b) {
int compare = ((String) base.get(a))
.compareTo((String) base.get(b));
if (compare == 0) {
return -1;
}
return compare;
}
}
}
这是测试类(我刚刚测试了它,这适用于Integer,StringMap:
package test.nl.iamit.util;
import java.util.HashMap;
import java.util.TreeMap;
import nl.iamit.util.Comparators;
import org.junit.Test;
import static org.junit.Assert.assertArrayEquals;
public class TestComparators {
@Test
public void testMapIntegerStringComparator(){
HashMap<Integer, String> unSoretedMap = new HashMap<Integer, String>();
Comparators.MapIntegerStringComparator bvc = new Comparators.MapIntegerStringComparator(
unSoretedMap);
TreeMap<Integer, String> sorted_map = new TreeMap<Integer, String>(bvc);
//the testdata:
unSoretedMap.put(new Integer(1), "E");
unSoretedMap.put(new Integer(2), "A");
unSoretedMap.put(new Integer(3), "E");
unSoretedMap.put(new Integer(4), "B");
unSoretedMap.put(new Integer(5), "F");
sorted_map.putAll(unSoretedMap);
Object[] targetKeys={new Integer(2),new Integer(4),new Integer(3),new Integer(1),new Integer(5) };
Object[] currecntKeys=sorted_map.keySet().toArray();
assertArrayEquals(targetKeys,currecntKeys);
}
}
以下是地图比较器的代码:
public static class MapStringDoubleComparator implements Comparator {
Map<String, Double> base;
public MapStringDoubleComparator(Map<String, Double> base) {
this.base = base;
}
//note if you want decending in stead of ascending, turn around 1 and -1
public int compare(Object a, Object b) {
if ((Double) base.get(a) == (Double) base.get(b)) {
return 0;
} else if((Double) base.get(a) < (Double) base.get(b)) {
return -1;
}else{
return 1;
}
}
}
这是一个测试用例:
@Test
public void testMapStringDoubleComparator(){
HashMap<String, Double> unSoretedMap = new HashMap<String, Double>();
Comparators.MapStringDoubleComparator bvc = new Comparators.MapStringDoubleComparator(
unSoretedMap);
TreeMap<String, Double> sorted_map = new TreeMap<String, Double>(bvc);
//the testdata:
unSoretedMap.put("D",new Double(67.3));
unSoretedMap.put("A",new Double(99.5));
unSoretedMap.put("B",new Double(67.4));
unSoretedMap.put("C",new Double(67.5));
unSoretedMap.put("E",new Double(99.5));
sorted_map.putAll(unSoretedMap);
Object[] targetKeys={"D","B","C","E","A"};
Object[] currecntKeys=sorted_map.keySet().toArray();
assertArrayEquals(targetKeys,currecntKeys);
}
当然,你可以让它更通用,但我只需要一个案例(地图)
最佳方法
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.Collections;
import java.util.Comparator;
import java.util.HashMap;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.Map;
import java.util.Set;
import java.util.Map.Entry;
public class OrderByValue {
public static void main(String a[]){
Map<String, Integer> map = new HashMap<String, Integer>();
map.put("java", 20);
map.put("C++", 45);
map.put("Unix", 67);
map.put("MAC", 26);
map.put("Why this kolavari", 93);
Set<Entry<String, Integer>> set = map.entrySet();
List<Entry<String, Integer>> list = new ArrayList<Entry<String, Integer>>(set);
Collections.sort( list, new Comparator<Map.Entry<String, Integer>>()
{
public int compare( Map.Entry<String, Integer> o1, Map.Entry<String, Integer> o2 )
{
return (o1.getValue()).compareTo( o2.getValue() );//Ascending order
//return (o2.getValue()).compareTo( o1.getValue() );//Descending order
}
} );
for(Map.Entry<String, Integer> entry:list){
System.out.println(entry.getKey()+" ==== "+entry.getValue());
}
}}
输出
java ==== 20
MAC ==== 26
C++ ==== 45
Unix ==== 67
Why this kolavari ==== 93