我对Java比较陌生,经常发现需要对值进行Map<Key,Value>排序。
由于这些值不是唯一的,我发现自己将keySet转换为一个数组,并使用自定义比较器通过数组排序对该数组进行排序,该比较器根据与该键关联的值进行排序。
有没有更简单的方法?
我对Java比较陌生,经常发现需要对值进行Map<Key,Value>排序。
由于这些值不是唯一的,我发现自己将keySet转换为一个数组,并使用自定义比较器通过数组排序对该数组进行排序,该比较器根据与该键关联的值进行排序。
有没有更简单的方法?
当前回答
为每个值创建一个条目列表,其中对值进行排序需要Java 8或更高版本
Map<Double,List<Entry<String,Double>>> sorted =
map.entrySet().stream().collect( Collectors.groupingBy( Entry::getValue, TreeMap::new,
Collectors.mapping( Function.identity(), Collectors.toList() ) ) );
使用映射{[A=99.5],[B=67.4],[C=67.3],[D=67.3]}得到{67.3=[D=67.3],67.4=[B=67.4,C=67.4],99.5=[A=99.5]}
…以及如何逐个访问每个条目:
sorted.entrySet().forEach( e -> e.getValue().forEach( l -> System.out.println( l ) ) );
D=67.3 B=67.4 C=67.4 A=99.5
其他回答
好的,这个版本使用两个新的Map对象和两次迭代,并对值进行排序。希望,虽然地图条目必须循环两次,但表现良好:
public static void main(String[] args) {
Map<String, String> unsorted = new HashMap<String, String>();
unsorted.put("Cde", "Cde_Value");
unsorted.put("Abc", "Abc_Value");
unsorted.put("Bcd", "Bcd_Value");
Comparator<String> comparer = new Comparator<String>() {
@Override
public int compare(String o1, String o2) {
return o1.compareTo(o2);
}};
System.out.println(sortByValue(unsorted, comparer));
}
public static <K, V> Map<K,V> sortByValue(Map<K, V> in, Comparator<? super V> compare) {
Map<V, K> swapped = new TreeMap<V, K>(compare);
for(Entry<K,V> entry: in.entrySet()) {
if (entry.getValue() != null) {
swapped.put(entry.getValue(), entry.getKey());
}
}
LinkedHashMap<K, V> result = new LinkedHashMap<K, V>();
for(Entry<V,K> entry: swapped.entrySet()) {
if (entry.getValue() != null) {
result.put(entry.getValue(), entry.getKey());
}
}
return result;
}
该解决方案使用带有比较器的TreeMap,并对所有空键和值进行排序。首先,使用TreeMap中的排序功能对值进行排序,然后使用排序后的Map创建一个结果,因为LinkedHashMap保留了相同的值顺序。
格里兹,GHad
public class SortedMapExample {
public static void main(String[] args) {
Map<String, String> map = new HashMap<String, String>();
map.put("Cde", "C");
map.put("Abc", "A");
map.put("Cbc", "Z");
map.put("Dbc", "D");
map.put("Bcd", "B");
map.put("sfd", "Bqw");
map.put("DDD", "Bas");
map.put("BGG", "Basd");
System.out.println(sort(map, new Comparator<String>() {
@Override
public int compare(String o1, String o2) {
return o1.compareTo(o2);
}}));
}
@SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
public static <K, V> Map<K,V> sort(Map<K, V> in, Comparator<? super V> compare) {
Map<K, V> result = new LinkedHashMap<K, V>();
V[] array = (V[])in.values().toArray();
for(int i=0;i<array.length;i++)
{
}
Arrays.sort(array, compare);
for (V item : array) {
K key= (K) getKey(in, item);
result.put(key, item);
}
return result;
}
public static <K, V> Object getKey(Map<K, V> in,V value)
{
Set<K> key= in.keySet();
Iterator<K> keyIterator=key.iterator();
while (keyIterator.hasNext()) {
K valueObject = (K) keyIterator.next();
if(in.get(valueObject).equals(value))
{
return valueObject;
}
}
return null;
}
}
//请在这里尝试。我正在修改值排序的代码。
以下是通用友好版本:
public class MapUtil {
public static <K, V extends Comparable<? super V>> Map<K, V> sortByValue(Map<K, V> map) {
List<Entry<K, V>> list = new ArrayList<>(map.entrySet());
list.sort(Entry.comparingByValue());
Map<K, V> result = new LinkedHashMap<>();
for (Entry<K, V> entry : list) {
result.put(entry.getKey(), entry.getValue());
}
return result;
}
}
当然,Stephen的解决方案真的很棒,但对于那些不会使用Guava的人来说:
这是我的解决方案,用于按值对地图进行排序。此解决方案处理两倍相同值等情况。。。
// If you want to sort a map by value, and if there can be twice the same value:
// here is your original map
Map<String,Integer> mapToSortByValue = new HashMap<String, Integer>();
mapToSortByValue.put("A", 3);
mapToSortByValue.put("B", 1);
mapToSortByValue.put("C", 3);
mapToSortByValue.put("D", 5);
mapToSortByValue.put("E", -1);
mapToSortByValue.put("F", 1000);
mapToSortByValue.put("G", 79);
mapToSortByValue.put("H", 15);
// Sort all the map entries by value
Set<Map.Entry<String,Integer>> set = new TreeSet<Map.Entry<String,Integer>>(
new Comparator<Map.Entry<String,Integer>>(){
@Override
public int compare(Map.Entry<String,Integer> obj1, Map.Entry<String,Integer> obj2) {
Integer val1 = obj1.getValue();
Integer val2 = obj2.getValue();
// DUPLICATE VALUE CASE
// If the values are equals, we can't return 0 because the 2 entries would be considered
// as equals and one of them would be deleted (because we use a set, no duplicate, remember!)
int compareValues = val1.compareTo(val2);
if ( compareValues == 0 ) {
String key1 = obj1.getKey();
String key2 = obj2.getKey();
int compareKeys = key1.compareTo(key2);
if ( compareKeys == 0 ) {
// what you return here will tell us if you keep REAL KEY-VALUE duplicates in your set
// if you want to, do whatever you want but do not return 0 (but don't break the comparator contract!)
return 0;
}
return compareKeys;
}
return compareValues;
}
}
);
set.addAll(mapToSortByValue.entrySet());
// OK NOW OUR SET IS SORTED COOL!!!!
// And there's nothing more to do: the entries are sorted by value!
for ( Map.Entry<String,Integer> entry : set ) {
System.out.println("Set entries: " + entry.getKey() + " -> " + entry.getValue());
}
// But if you add them to an hashmap
Map<String,Integer> myMap = new HashMap<String,Integer>();
// When iterating over the set the order is still good in the println...
for ( Map.Entry<String,Integer> entry : set ) {
System.out.println("Added to result map entries: " + entry.getKey() + " " + entry.getValue());
myMap.put(entry.getKey(), entry.getValue());
}
// But once they are in the hashmap, the order is not kept!
for ( Integer value : myMap.values() ) {
System.out.println("Result map values: " + value);
}
// Also this way doesn't work:
// Logic because the entryset is a hashset for hashmaps and not a treeset
// (and even if it was a treeset, it would be on the keys only)
for ( Map.Entry<String,Integer> entry : myMap.entrySet() ) {
System.out.println("Result map entries: " + entry.getKey() + " -> " + entry.getValue());
}
// CONCLUSION:
// If you want to iterate on a map ordered by value, you need to remember:
// 1) Maps are only sorted by keys, so you can't sort them directly by value
// 2) So you simply CAN'T return a map to a sortMapByValue function
// 3) You can't reverse the keys and the values because you have duplicate values
// This also means you can't neither use Guava/Commons bidirectionnal treemaps or stuff like that
// SOLUTIONS
// So you can:
// 1) only sort the values which is easy, but you loose the key/value link (since you have duplicate values)
// 2) sort the map entries, but don't forget to handle the duplicate value case (like i did)
// 3) if you really need to return a map, use a LinkedHashMap which keep the insertion order
执行官:http://www.ideone.com/dq3Lu
输出:
Set entries: E -> -1
Set entries: B -> 1
Set entries: A -> 3
Set entries: C -> 3
Set entries: D -> 5
Set entries: H -> 15
Set entries: G -> 79
Set entries: F -> 1000
Added to result map entries: E -1
Added to result map entries: B 1
Added to result map entries: A 3
Added to result map entries: C 3
Added to result map entries: D 5
Added to result map entries: H 15
Added to result map entries: G 79
Added to result map entries: F 1000
Result map values: 5
Result map values: -1
Result map values: 1000
Result map values: 79
Result map values: 3
Result map values: 1
Result map values: 3
Result map values: 15
Result map entries: D -> 5
Result map entries: E -> -1
Result map entries: F -> 1000
Result map entries: G -> 79
Result map entries: A -> 3
Result map entries: B -> 1
Result map entries: C -> 3
Result map entries: H -> 15
希望它能帮助一些人
commons集合库包含一个名为TreeBidiMap的解决方案。或者,你可以看看谷歌收藏API。它有你可以使用的TreeMultimap。
如果你不想使用这些框架。。。它们带有源代码。