个人电脑。

毫无疑问，在过去的30年里，计算最重要的部分是现在每个人都是它的一部分。家用电脑大约从1977年才开始普及，直到80年代才得到广泛应用。现在，幼儿园、老年中心和你的每个邻居都有一台。

在社区支持下，翻译软件可以进行手动更正和建议，随后由人工智能机器人形成模式，最终区分并正确预测不同翻译和上下文中的歧义。

虽然谷歌Translate可能不是野兽，但它是一个系统的母亲，或者可能是等待开发的祖母。

如果你仔细想想，文本语言实际上是大脑的输入，眼睛看到文本并将图像发送到大脑，然后大脑将其转化为理解。

虽然它真正的交流(尤其是人与人之间的交流)是一个高级的话题，但基本的是输入(带上下文)->翻译->理解。

为什么我们仍然没有真正的好办法给远方的同事或不会说我们语言的伙伴发送电子邮件?这显然是第一阶段。

一旦完成，我们就可以进行实时电话翻译之类的工作了。

相反，月复一月，我们最大的智力资产被用于其他更重要的项目，比如太空研究、流星探测，或者试图证明《圣经》是错的(打哈欠)。

我们把更多的时间花在基本的实际交流上怎么样?

什么都没有。

我认为这是因为人们改变了他们的态度。人们过去相信，只要找到“好点子”，就能一夜暴富。如今，人们相信，回报最大的是执行过程，而不是发现过程。你有诸如“想法一毛钱一打”和“第二只老鼠得到奶酪”这样的咒语。因此，人们专注于开发现有的想法，而不是想出新的想法。

数字音乐合成器。

我认为，整个音乐场景都受到了廉价复调合成器的影响。 早期的复调合成器是有效地多个模拟合成器(离散或使用CEM或SSM芯片)。它们都很昂贵，而且数量有限。在80年代，第一个数字系统出现了(我不确定，但我认为Kurzweil是第一个)。 今天，大多数都是数字的——甚至模拟的也是典型的“虚拟模拟”。

问候

编辑:哎呀-我刚刚发现CMI灯管是在1978年发明的。忘掉上面的，抱歉。

I'd say the biggest trend is an ever increasing lack of location dependence and pervasiveness. An interesting philosophical exercise these days is to count the computers in you immediate area. They're everywhere desktops, keyboards, microwaves, radios, televisions, cell phones etc... My grandmother computer is illiterate however her life is as infested with small computers as everyone else's. She can make a call to me from the middle of an empty field. I can then answer that call zipping down the highway.

回答“为什么新思想会消亡”和“如何应对”这两个问题?

I suspect a lot of the lack of progress is due to the massive influx of capital and entrenched wealth in the industry. Sounds counterintuitive, but I think it's become conventional wisdom that any new idea gets one shot; if it doesn't make it at the first try, it can't come back. It gets bought by someone with entrenched interests, or just FAILs, and the energy is gone. A couple examples are tablet computers, and integrated office software. The Newton and several others had real potential, but ended up (through competitive attrition and bad judgment) squandering their birthrights, killing whole categories. (I was especially fond of Ashton Tate's Framework; but I'm still stuck with Word and Excel).

怎么办呢?首先想到的是Wm。莎士比亚的建议:“让我们杀了所有的律师。”但恐怕他们现在装备太精良了。实际上，我认为最好的选择是找到某种开源计划。它们似乎比其他选择更好地保持可访问性和增量改进。但是这个行业已经变得足够大了，所以某种有机的合作机制是必要的。

I also think that there's a dynamic that says that the entrenched interests (especially platforms) require a substantial amount of change - churn - to justify continuing revenue streams; and this absorbs a lot of creative energy that could have been spent in better ways. Look how much time we spend treading water with the newest iteration from Microsoft or Sun or Linux or Firefox, making changes to systems that for the most part work fine already. It's not because they are evil, it's just built into the industry. There's no such thing as Stable Equilibrium; all the feedback mechanisms are positive, favoring change over stability. (Did you ever see a feature withdrawn, or a change retracted?)

关于SO的另一个讨论线索是臭鼬工厂综合症(参考:Geoffrey Moore):在大型组织中，真正的创新几乎总是(90%以上)出现在自发出现的未经授权的项目中，这些项目完全由个人或小团队的主动性推动(通常会受到正式的管理等级的反对)。所以:质疑权威，反抗体制。