我已经成功地实现了onRetainNonConfigurationInstance()为我的主活动保存和恢复某些关键组件跨屏幕方向的变化。
但看起来,当方向改变时,我的自定义视图正在从头重新创建。这是有意义的,尽管在我的例子中不方便,因为所讨论的自定义视图是一个X/Y图形,并且绘制的点存储在自定义视图中。
是否有一种巧妙的方法来实现类似于onRetainNonConfigurationInstance()的自定义视图,或者我只需要在自定义视图中实现方法,允许我获得和设置其“状态”?
我已经成功地实现了onRetainNonConfigurationInstance()为我的主活动保存和恢复某些关键组件跨屏幕方向的变化。
但看起来,当方向改变时,我的自定义视图正在从头重新创建。这是有意义的,尽管在我的例子中不方便,因为所讨论的自定义视图是一个X/Y图形,并且绘制的点存储在自定义视图中。
是否有一种巧妙的方法来实现类似于onRetainNonConfigurationInstance()的自定义视图,或者我只需要在自定义视图中实现方法,允许我获得和设置其“状态”?
当前回答
为了补充其他答案-如果您有多个具有相同ID的自定义复合视图,并且它们都在配置更改时使用上一个视图的状态进行恢复,您所需要做的就是告诉视图仅通过覆盖两个方法将保存/恢复事件分派给自己。
class MyCompoundView : ViewGroup {
...
override fun dispatchSaveInstanceState(container: SparseArray<Parcelable>) {
dispatchFreezeSelfOnly(container)
}
override fun dispatchRestoreInstanceState(container: SparseArray<Parcelable>) {
dispatchThawSelfOnly(container)
}
}
对于正在发生的事情和为什么这样做的解释,请参阅这篇博客文章。基本上你的复合视图的子视图id是由每个复合视图共享的,状态恢复会很混乱。通过仅为复合视图本身调度状态,我们可以防止它们的子视图从其他复合视图获得混合消息。
其他回答
这里的答案已经很好了,但并不一定适用于自定义viewgroup。为了让所有自定义视图保留它们的状态,你必须在每个类中重写onSaveInstanceState()和onRestoreInstanceState(Parcelable state)。 您还需要确保它们都具有唯一的id,无论它们是从xml扩展的还是以编程方式添加的。
我想出的答案与Kobor42的答案非常相似,但错误仍然存在,因为我以编程方式将视图添加到自定义ViewGroup中,而没有分配唯一的id。
由mato共享的链接可以工作,但这意味着没有任何单个视图管理它们自己的状态——整个状态保存在ViewGroup方法中。
问题是,当多个viewgroup被添加到一个布局中时,它们在xml中的元素id不再是唯一的(如果它是在xml中定义的)。在运行时,你可以调用静态方法View. generateviewid()来获取一个视图的唯一id。这只在API 17中可用。
下面是我在ViewGroup中的代码(它是抽象的,mOriginalValue是一个类型变量):
public abstract class DetailRow<E> extends LinearLayout {
private static final String SUPER_INSTANCE_STATE = "saved_instance_state_parcelable";
private static final String STATE_VIEW_IDS = "state_view_ids";
private static final String STATE_ORIGINAL_VALUE = "state_original_value";
private E mOriginalValue;
private int[] mViewIds;
// ...
@Override
protected Parcelable onSaveInstanceState() {
// Create a bundle to put super parcelable in
Bundle bundle = new Bundle();
bundle.putParcelable(SUPER_INSTANCE_STATE, super.onSaveInstanceState());
// Use abstract method to put mOriginalValue in the bundle;
putValueInTheBundle(mOriginalValue, bundle, STATE_ORIGINAL_VALUE);
// Store mViewIds in the bundle - initialize if necessary.
if (mViewIds == null) {
// We need as many ids as child views
mViewIds = new int[getChildCount()];
for (int i = 0; i < mViewIds.length; i++) {
// generate a unique id for each view
mViewIds[i] = View.generateViewId();
// assign the id to the view at the same index
getChildAt(i).setId(mViewIds[i]);
}
}
bundle.putIntArray(STATE_VIEW_IDS, mViewIds);
// return the bundle
return bundle;
}
@Override
protected void onRestoreInstanceState(Parcelable state) {
// We know state is a Bundle:
Bundle bundle = (Bundle) state;
// Get mViewIds out of the bundle
mViewIds = bundle.getIntArray(STATE_VIEW_IDS);
// For each id, assign to the view of same index
if (mViewIds != null) {
for (int i = 0; i < mViewIds.length; i++) {
getChildAt(i).setId(mViewIds[i]);
}
}
// Get mOriginalValue out of the bundle
mOriginalValue = getValueBackOutOfTheBundle(bundle, STATE_ORIGINAL_VALUE);
// get super parcelable back out of the bundle and pass it to
// super.onRestoreInstanceState(Parcelable)
state = bundle.getParcelable(SUPER_INSTANCE_STATE);
super.onRestoreInstanceState(state);
}
}
我认为这是一个更简单的版本。Bundle是实现Parcelable的内置类型
public class CustomView extends View
{
private int stuff; // stuff
@Override
public Parcelable onSaveInstanceState()
{
Bundle bundle = new Bundle();
bundle.putParcelable("superState", super.onSaveInstanceState());
bundle.putInt("stuff", this.stuff); // ... save stuff
return bundle;
}
@Override
public void onRestoreInstanceState(Parcelable state)
{
if (state instanceof Bundle) // implicit null check
{
Bundle bundle = (Bundle) state;
this.stuff = bundle.getInt("stuff"); // ... load stuff
state = bundle.getParcelable("superState");
}
super.onRestoreInstanceState(state);
}
}
根据@Fletcher Johns的回答,我想出了:
自定义布局 可以从XML膨胀 能够保存/恢复直接和间接的儿童。我改进了@Fletcher Johns的答案,将Id保存在String->Id map中,而不是IntArray。 唯一的小缺点是必须预先声明可保存的子视图。
open class AddressView @JvmOverloads constructor(
context: Context,
attrs: AttributeSet? = null,
defStyleAttr: Int = 0,
defStyleRes: Int = 0
) : LinearLayout(context, attrs, defStyleAttr, defStyleRes) {
protected lateinit var countryInputLayout: TextInputLayout
protected lateinit var countryAutoCompleteTextView: CountryAutoCompleteTextView
protected lateinit var cityInputLayout: TextInputLayout
protected lateinit var cityEditText: CityEditText
protected lateinit var postCodeInputLayout: TextInputLayout
protected lateinit var postCodeEditText: PostCodeEditText
protected lateinit var streetInputLayout: TextInputLayout
protected lateinit var streetEditText: StreetEditText
init {
initView()
}
private fun initView() {
val view = inflate(context, R.layout.view_address, this)
orientation = VERTICAL
countryInputLayout = view.findViewById(R.id.countryInputLayout)
countryAutoCompleteTextView = view.findViewById(R.id.countryAutoCompleteTextView)
streetInputLayout = view.findViewById(R.id.streetInputLayout)
streetEditText = view.findViewById(R.id.streetEditText)
cityInputLayout = view.findViewById(R.id.cityInputLayout)
cityEditText = view.findViewById(R.id.cityEditText)
postCodeInputLayout = view.findViewById(R.id.postCodeInputLayout)
postCodeEditText = view.findViewById(R.id.postCodeEditText)
}
// Declare your direct and indirect child views that need to be saved
private val childrenToSave get() = mapOf<String, View>(
"coutryIL" to countryInputLayout,
"countryACTV" to countryAutoCompleteTextView,
"streetIL" to streetInputLayout,
"streetET" to streetEditText,
"cityIL" to cityInputLayout,
"cityET" to cityEditText,
"postCodeIL" to postCodeInputLayout,
"postCodeET" to postCodeEditText,
)
private var viewIds: HashMap<String, Int>? = null
override fun onSaveInstanceState(): Parcelable? {
// Create a bundle to put super parcelable in
val bundle = Bundle()
bundle.putParcelable(SUPER_INSTANCE_STATE, super.onSaveInstanceState())
// Store viewIds in the bundle - initialize if necessary.
if (viewIds == null) {
childrenToSave.values.forEach { view -> view.id = generateViewId() }
viewIds = HashMap<String, Int>(childrenToSave.mapValues { (key, view) -> view.id })
}
bundle.putSerializable(STATE_VIEW_IDS, viewIds)
return bundle
}
override fun onRestoreInstanceState(state: Parcelable?) {
// We know state is a Bundle:
val bundle = state as Bundle
// Get mViewIds out of the bundle
viewIds = bundle.getSerializable(STATE_VIEW_IDS) as HashMap<String, Int>
// For each id, assign to the view of same index
if (viewIds != null) {
viewIds!!.forEach { (key, id) -> childrenToSave[key]!!.id = id }
}
super.onRestoreInstanceState(bundle.getParcelable(SUPER_INSTANCE_STATE))
}
companion object {
private const val SUPER_INSTANCE_STATE = "saved_instance_state_parcelable"
private const val STATE_VIEW_IDS = "state_view_ids"
}
}
我有一个问题,onRestoreInstanceState恢复了我所有的自定义视图与最后一个视图的状态。我通过向我的自定义视图添加这两个方法来解决这个问题:
@Override
protected void dispatchSaveInstanceState(SparseArray<Parcelable> container) {
dispatchFreezeSelfOnly(container);
}
@Override
protected void dispatchRestoreInstanceState(SparseArray<Parcelable> container) {
dispatchThawSelfOnly(container);
}
为了补充其他答案-如果您有多个具有相同ID的自定义复合视图,并且它们都在配置更改时使用上一个视图的状态进行恢复,您所需要做的就是告诉视图仅通过覆盖两个方法将保存/恢复事件分派给自己。
class MyCompoundView : ViewGroup {
...
override fun dispatchSaveInstanceState(container: SparseArray<Parcelable>) {
dispatchFreezeSelfOnly(container)
}
override fun dispatchRestoreInstanceState(container: SparseArray<Parcelable>) {
dispatchThawSelfOnly(container)
}
}
对于正在发生的事情和为什么这样做的解释,请参阅这篇博客文章。基本上你的复合视图的子视图id是由每个复合视图共享的,状态恢复会很混乱。通过仅为复合视图本身调度状态,我们可以防止它们的子视图从其他复合视图获得混合消息。