基本上有三种选择。

一种是不传递它而是使用目标函数的变进实现而不传递椭圆。另一种方法是使用可变宏。第三个选择是我所缺少的所有东西。

我通常选择第一种，因为我觉得这真的很容易处理。选项二有一个缺点，因为调用可变宏有一些限制。

下面是一些示例代码:

#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdarg.h>

#define Option_VariadicMacro(f, ...)\
    printf("printing using format: %s", f);\
    printf(f, __VA_ARGS__)

int Option_ResolveVariadicAndPassOn(const char * f, ... )
{
    int r;
    va_list args;

    printf("printing using format: %s", f);
    va_start(args, f);
    r = vprintf(f, args);
    va_end(args);
    return r;
}

void main()
{
    const char * f = "%s %s %s\n";
    const char * a = "One";
    const char * b = "Two";
    const char * c = "Three";
    printf("---- Normal Print ----\n");
    printf(f, a, b, c);
    printf("\n");
    printf("---- Option_VariadicMacro ----\n");
    Option_VariadicMacro(f, a, b, c);
    printf("\n");
    printf("---- Option_ResolveVariadicAndPassOn ----\n");
    Option_ResolveVariadicAndPassOn(f, a, b, c);
    printf("\n");
}

如果您没有类似于vfprintf的函数，它接受一个va_list而不是可变数量的参数，那么您就不能这样做。见http://c-faq.com/varargs/handoff.html。

例子:

void myfun(const char *fmt, va_list argp) {
    vfprintf(stderr, fmt, argp);
}

Not sure if this helps to answer OP's question since I do not know why the restriction for using a helper function akin to vfprintf in the wrapper function applies. I think the key problem here is that forwarding the variadic argument list without interpreting them is difficult. What is possible, is to perform the formatting (using a helper function akin to vfprintf: vsnprintf) and forward the formatted output to the wrapped function with variadic arguments (i.e. not modifying the definition of the wrapped function). So, here we go:

#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdarg.h>

int my_printf(char *fmt, ...)
{
    if (fmt == NULL) {
        /* Invalid format pointer */
        return -1;
    } else {
        va_list args;
        int len;

        /* Initialize a variable argument list */
        va_start(args, fmt);

        /* Get length of format including arguments */
        len = vsnprintf(NULL, 0, fmt, args);

        /* End using variable argument list */
        va_end(args);
        
        if (len < 0) {
            /* vsnprintf failed */
            return -1;
        } else {
            /* Declare a character buffer for the formatted string */
            char formatted[len + 1];

            /* Initialize a variable argument list */
            va_start(args, fmt);
            
            /* Write the formatted output */
            vsnprintf(formatted, sizeof(formatted), fmt, args);
            
            /* End using variable argument list */
            va_end(args);

            /* Call the wrapped function using the formatted output and return */
            fprintf(stderr, "Calling printf with fmt %s", fmt);
            return printf("%s", formatted);
        }
    }
}

int main()
{
    /* Expected output: Test
     * Expected error: Calling printf with fmt Test
     */
    my_printf("Test\n");
    //printf("Test\n");

    /* Expected output: Test
     * Expected error: Calling printf with fmt %s
     */
    my_printf("%s\n", "Test");
    //printf("%s\n", "Test");

    /* Expected output: %s
     * Expected error: Calling printf with fmt %s
     */
    my_printf("%s\n", "%s");
    //printf("%s\n", "%s");

    return 0;
}

我遇到了这个解。

编辑:修正由egmont指出的错误

没有办法转发这样的函数调用，因为可以检索原始堆栈元素的唯一位置是my_print()。像这样包装调用的通常方法是有两个函数，一个只是将参数转换为各种varargs结构体，另一个实际操作这些结构体。使用这样的双函数模型，您可以(例如)通过使用va_start()初始化my_printf()中的结构来包装printf()，然后将它们传递给vfprintf()。

最好的办法是

static BOOL(__cdecl *OriginalVarArgsFunction)(BYTE variable1, char* format, ...)(0x12345678); //TODO: change address lolz

BOOL __cdecl HookedVarArgsFunction(BYTE variable1, char* format, ...)
{
    BOOL res;

    va_list vl;
    va_start(vl, format);

    // Get variable arguments count from disasm. -2 because of existing 'format', 'variable1'
    uint32_t argCount = *((uint8_t*)_ReturnAddress() + 2) / sizeof(void*) - 2;
    printf("arg count = %d\n", argCount);

    // ((int( __cdecl* )(const char*, ...))&oldCode)(fmt, ...);
    __asm
    {
        mov eax, argCount
        test eax, eax
        je noLoop
        mov edx, vl
        loop1 :
        push dword ptr[edx + eax * 4 - 4]
        sub eax, 1
        jnz loop1
        noLoop :
        push format
        push variable1
        //lea eax, [oldCode] // oldCode - original function pointer
        mov eax, OriginalVarArgsFunction
        call eax
        mov res, eax
        mov eax, argCount
        lea eax, [eax * 4 + 8] //+8 because 2 parameters (format and variable1)
        add esp, eax
    }
    return res;
}

使用函数:

int my_printf(char *fmt, ...) {
    va_list va;
    int ret;

    va_start(va, fmt);
    ret = vfprintf(stderr, fmt, va);
    va_end(va);
    return ret;
}