下面的代码在第2行接收到seg错误:
char *str = "string";
str[0] = 'z'; // could be also written as *str = 'z'
printf("%s\n", str);
虽然这个方法非常有效:
char str[] = "string";
str[0] = 'z';
printf("%s\n", str);
用MSVC和GCC测试。
下面的代码在第2行接收到seg错误:
char *str = "string";
str[0] = 'z'; // could be also written as *str = 'z'
printf("%s\n", str);
虽然这个方法非常有效:
char str[] = "string";
str[0] = 'z';
printf("%s\n", str);
用MSVC和GCC测试。
当前回答
char *str = "string";
上面的代码将str设置为指向在程序的二进制映像中硬编码的字面值“string”,它在内存中可能被标记为只读。
因此str[0]=试图写入应用程序的只读代码。我猜这可能依赖于编译器。
其他回答
// create a string constant like this - will be read only
char *str_p;
str_p = "String constant";
// create an array of characters like this
char *arr_p;
char arr[] = "String in an array";
arr_p = &arr[0];
// now we try to change a character in the array first, this will work
*arr_p = 'E';
// lets try to change the first character of the string contant
*str_p = 'G'; // this will result in a segmentation fault. Comment it out to work.
/*-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
* String constants can't be modified. A segmentation fault is the result,
* because most operating systems will not allow a write
* operation on read only memory.
*-----------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
//print both strings to see if they have changed
printf("%s\n", str_p); //print the string without a variable
printf("%s\n", arr_p); //print the string, which is in an array.
像“String”这样的字符串文字可能在可执行文件的地址空间中作为只读数据分配(通过编译器)。当你去触摸它时,它会害怕你在它的泳衣区,并让你知道一个隔离错误。
在第一个例子中,你得到一个指向const数据的指针。在第二个示例中,使用const数据的副本初始化一个7个字符的数组。
为什么我得到一个分割错误时写入字符串?
c99n1256草案
字符串字面量有两种不同的用法:
Initialize char[]: char c[] = "abc"; This is "more magic", and described at 6.7.8/14 "Initialization": An array of character type may be initialized by a character string literal, optionally enclosed in braces. Successive characters of the character string literal (including the terminating null character if there is room or if the array is of unknown size) initialize the elements of the array. So this is just a shortcut for: char c[] = {'a', 'b', 'c', '\0'}; Like any other regular array, c can be modified. Everywhere else: it generates an: unnamed array of char What is the type of string literals in C and C++? with static storage that gives UB if modified So when you write: char *c = "abc"; This is similar to: /* __unnamed is magic because modifying it gives UB. */ static char __unnamed[] = "abc"; char *c = __unnamed; Note the implicit cast from char[] to char *, which is always legal. Then if you modify c[0], you also modify __unnamed, which is UB. This is documented at 6.4.5 "String literals": 5 In translation phase 7, a byte or code of value zero is appended to each multibyte character sequence that results from a string literal or literals. The multibyte character sequence is then used to initialize an array of static storage duration and length just sufficient to contain the sequence. For character string literals, the array elements have type char, and are initialized with the individual bytes of the multibyte character sequence [...] 6 It is unspecified whether these arrays are distinct provided their elements have the appropriate values. If the program attempts to modify such an array, the behavior is undefined.
6.7.8/32“初始化”给出了一个直接的例子:
EXAMPLE 8: The declaration char s[] = "abc", t[3] = "abc"; defines "plain" char array objects s and t whose elements are initialized with character string literals. This declaration is identical to char s[] = { 'a', 'b', 'c', '\0' }, t[] = { 'a', 'b', 'c' }; The contents of the arrays are modifiable. On the other hand, the declaration char *p = "abc"; defines p with type "pointer to char" and initializes it to point to an object with type "array of char" with length 4 whose elements are initialized with a character string literal. If an attempt is made to use p to modify the contents of the array, the behavior is undefined.
GCC 4.8 x86-64 ELF实现
计划:
#include <stdio.h>
int main(void) {
char *s = "abc";
printf("%s\n", s);
return 0;
}
编译和反编译:
gcc -ggdb -std=c99 -c main.c
objdump -Sr main.o
输出包含:
char *s = "abc";
8: 48 c7 45 f8 00 00 00 movq $0x0,-0x8(%rbp)
f: 00
c: R_X86_64_32S .rodata
结论:GCC将char* it存储在.rodata部分,而不是在.text中。
如果我们对char[]做同样的操作:
char s[] = "abc";
我们获得:
17: c7 45 f0 61 62 63 00 movl $0x636261,-0x10(%rbp)
因此它被存储在堆栈中(相对于%rbp)。
但是请注意,默认的链接器脚本将.rodata和.text放在同一个段中,该段有执行权限,但没有写权限。这可以观察到:
readelf -l a.out
它包含:
Section to Segment mapping:
Segment Sections...
02 .text .rodata
要理解这个错误或问题,您应该首先了解指针和数组的差异b/w 所以在这里,我首先要解释一下它们的区别
字符串数组
char strarray[] = "hello";
在存储器数组中存储的是连续存储器单元,存储为[h][e][l][l][o][\0] =>[]是1个char字节大小的存储器单元,而这个连续存储器单元可以通过名为strarray的名称在这里访问。这里string数组strarray本身包含初始化的所有字符串。在这种情况下,"hello" 因此,我们可以通过访问每个字符的索引值来轻松地更改其内存内容
`strarray[0]='m'` it access character at index 0 which is 'h'in strarray
它的值变成了m所以strarray的值变成了mello;
这里需要注意的一点是,我们可以通过一个字符一个字符地改变字符串数组的内容,但不能像strarray="new string"这样直接初始化其他字符串,这是无效的
指针
我们都知道指针指向内存中的内存位置, 未初始化的指针指向随机内存位置,初始化后指向特定内存位置
char *ptr = "hello";
这里的指针ptr被初始化为字符串“hello”,这是一个存储在只读存储器(ROM)中的常量字符串,所以“hello”不能被更改,因为它存储在ROM中
PTR存储在堆栈部分并指向常量字符串"hello"
所以ptr[0]='m'是无效的,因为你不能访问只读内存
但是ptr可以直接初始化为其他字符串值,因为它只是一个指针,所以它可以指向其数据类型变量的任何内存地址
ptr="new string"; is valid
因为在第一个例子的上下文中,“whatever”的类型是const char*(即使你将它赋值给一个非const char*),这意味着你不应该尝试写它。
编译器通过将字符串放在内存的只读部分来强制执行这一点,因此写入它会产生段错误。