在这个网站上已经有很多性能问题了,但是在我看来,几乎所有的问题都是非常具体的,而且相当狭窄。几乎所有人都重复了避免过早优化的建议。

我们假设:

代码已经正常工作了 所选择的算法对于问题的环境已经是最优的 对代码进行了测量,并隔离了有问题的例程 所有优化的尝试也将被衡量,以确保它们不会使事情变得更糟

我在这里寻找的是策略和技巧,在一个关键算法中,当没有其他事情可做,但无论如何都要挤出最后百分之几。

理想情况下,尽量让答案与语言无关,并在适用的情况下指出所建议的策略的任何缺点。

我将添加一个带有我自己最初建议的回复,并期待Stack Overflow社区能想到的任何其他东西。


当前回答

When you get to the point that you're using efficient algorithms its a question of what you need more speed or memory. Use caching to "pay" in memory for more speed or use calculations to reduce the memory footprint. If possible (and more cost effective) throw hardware at the problem - faster CPU, more memory or HD could solve the problem faster then trying to code it. Use parallelization if possible - run part of the code on multiple threads. Use the right tool for the job. some programing languages create more efficient code, using managed code (i.e. Java/.NET) speed up development but native programing languages creates faster running code. Micro optimize. Only were applicable you can use optimized assembly to speed small pieces of code, using SSE/vector optimizations in the right places can greatly increase performance.

其他回答

如果更好的硬件是一个选择,那么一定要去做。否则

Check you are using the best compiler and linker options. If hotspot routine in different library to frequent caller, consider moving or cloning it to the callers module. Eliminates some of the call overhead and may improve cache hits (cf how AIX links strcpy() statically into separately linked shared objects). This could of course decrease cache hits also, which is why one measure. See if there is any possibility of using a specialized version of the hotspot routine. Downside is more than one version to maintain. Look at the assembler. If you think it could be better, consider why the compiler did not figure this out, and how you could help the compiler. Consider: are you really using the best algorithm? Is it the best algorithm for your input size?

很难对这个问题给出一般的答案。这实际上取决于你的问题领域和技术实现。一种与语言无关的通用技术:识别无法消除的代码热点,并手工优化汇编代码。

更多的建议:

Avoid I/O: Any I/O (disk, network, ports, etc.) is always going to be far slower than any code that is performing calculations, so get rid of any I/O that you do not strictly need. Move I/O up-front: Load up all the data you are going to need for a calculation up-front, so that you do not have repeated I/O waits within the core of a critical algorithm (and maybe as a result repeated disk seeks, when loading all the data in one hit may avoid seeking). Delay I/O: Do not write out your results until the calculation is over, store them in a data structure and then dump that out in one go at the end when the hard work is done. Threaded I/O: For those daring enough, combine 'I/O up-front' or 'Delay I/O' with the actual calculation by moving the loading into a parallel thread, so that while you are loading more data you can work on a calculation on the data you already have, or while you calculate the next batch of data you can simultaneously write out the results from the last batch.

虽然我喜欢Mike Dunlavey的回答,但事实上这是一个很好的答案,并且有支持的例子,我认为它可以简单地表达出来:

首先找出哪些事情最耗费时间,并了解原因。

它是时间消耗的识别过程,可以帮助您了解必须在哪里改进算法。这是我能找到的唯一一个全面的语言不可知论答案,这个问题已经被认为是完全优化的。同时假设您希望在追求速度的过程中独立于体系结构。

因此,虽然算法可能被优化了,但它的实现可能没有。标识可以让您知道哪个部分是哪个部分:算法或实现。所以,占用时间最多的就是你审查的首选对象。但是既然你说你想把最后的%挤出来,你可能还想检查一下较小的部分,那些你一开始没有仔细检查过的部分。

最后,对实现相同解决方案的不同方法的性能数据进行一些尝试和错误,或者可能的不同算法,可以带来有助于识别浪费时间和节省时间的见解。

HPH, asoudmove。

当你不能再提高表现时,看看你是否可以提高感知的表现。

您可能无法使您的fooCalc算法更快,但通常有一些方法可以使您的应用程序对用户的响应更快。

举几个例子:

预测用户将要做什么 请求并开始着手这项工作 在那之前 将结果显示为 它们是进来的,而不是同时出现的 在最后 精确的进度计

这些不会让你的程序更快,但可能会让你的用户对你的速度更满意。