我采用下面的方法切片删除项目。这有助于提高其他人的可读性。也是不可变的。

func remove(items []string, item string) []string {
    newitems := []string{}

    for _, i := range items {
        if i != item {
            newitems = append(newitems, i)
        }
    }

    return newitems
}

因为Slice是由数组支持的因为你不可能从数组中删除一个元素而不重新洗牌内存，我不想写这么难看的代码;下面是一个伪代码，用于保存已删除项的索引;基本上，我想要一个有序的切片，即使在删除后位置也很重要

type ListSlice struct {
  sortedArray []int
  deletedIndex map[int]bool
}
func lenSlice(m ListSlice)int{
    return len(m.sortedArray)
}
func deleteSliceElem(index int,m ListSlice){
    m.deletedIndex[index]=true
}
func getSliceElem(m ListSlice,i int)(int,bool){
    _,deleted :=m.deletedIndex[i]
    return m.sortedArray[i],deleted
}

for i := 0; i < lenSlice(sortedArray); i++ {
        
        k,deleted := getSliceElem(sortedArray,i)
        if deleted {continue}
        ....
        deleteSliceElem(i,sortedArray)

}

m := ListSlice{sortedArray: []int{5, 4, 3},deletedIndex: make(map[int]bool) }
...

找到一条不需要搬迁的路。

更改订单

a := []string{"A", "B", "C", "D", "E"}
i := 2

// Remove the element at index i from a.
a[i] = a[len(a)-1] // Copy last element to index i.
a[len(a)-1] = ""   // Erase last element (write zero value).
a = a[:len(a)-1]   // Truncate slice.

fmt.Println(a) // [A B E D]

维持秩序

a := []string{"A", "B", "C", "D", "E"}
i := 2

// Remove the element at index i from a.
copy(a[i:], a[i+1:]) // Shift a[i+1:] left one index.
a[len(a)-1] = ""     // Erase last element (write zero value).
a = a[:len(a)-1]     // Truncate slice.

fmt.Println(a) // [A B D E]

你需要稍微修改一下你的代码，

new_arr := make([]int, (len(arr) - 1))
for i := 0; i < len(arr); i++ {
    if i != pos {
        new_arr = append(new_arr, arr[i])
    }
}

为了更有效的循环，你可以使用这个

for i, item := range arr {
    ...
}

最后，您可以通过使用本机切片功能来实现这一点

new_arr = append(arr[:2], arr[3:])

最后一个解决方案是删除索引2中的元素，并将新切片放在new_arr中。

这看起来有点奇怪，但这里的大多数答案都很危险，掩盖了他们实际在做的事情。看看最初关于从切片中移除一个项目的问题切片的副本正在制作，然后被填充。这可以确保当切片在程序中传递时，不会引入微妙的错误。

这里有一些代码比较用户在这个帖子和原始帖子中的回答。这是一个可以随意处理代码的游乐场。

基于追加的删除

package main

import (
    "fmt"
)

func RemoveIndex(s []int, index int) []int {
    return append(s[:index], s[index+1:]...)
}

func main() {
    all := []int{0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9}
    fmt.Println("all: ", all) //[0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9]
    removeIndex := RemoveIndex(all, 5)

    fmt.Println("all: ", all) //[0 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 9]
    fmt.Println("removeIndex: ", removeIndex) //[0 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9]

    removeIndex[0] = 999
    fmt.Println("all: ", all) //[999 1 2 3 4 6 7 9 9]
    fmt.Println("removeIndex: ", removeIndex) //[999 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9]
}

In the above example you can see me create a slice and fill it manually with numbers 0 to 9. We then remove index 5 from all and assign it to remove index. However when we go to print out all now we see that it has been modified as well. This is because slices are pointers to an underlying array. Writing it out to removeIndex causes all to be modified as well with the difference being all is longer by one element that is no longer reachable from removeIndex. Next we change a value in removeIndex and we can see all gets modified as well. Effective go goes into some more detail on this.

下面的例子我就不细讲了，但它和我们的目的是一样的。只是说明了使用copy没有什么不同。

package main

import (
    "fmt"
)

func RemoveCopy(slice []int, i int) []int {
    copy(slice[i:], slice[i+1:])
    return slice[:len(slice)-1]
}

func main() {
    all := []int{0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9}
    fmt.Println("all: ", all) //[0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9]
    removeCopy := RemoveCopy(all, 5)

    fmt.Println("all: ", all) //[0 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 9]
    fmt.Println("removeCopy: ", removeCopy) //[0 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9]

    removeCopy[0] = 999
    fmt.Println("all: ", all) //[99 1 2 3 4 6 7 9 9]
    fmt.Println("removeCopy: ", removeCopy) //[999 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9]
}

问题的原始答案

看看最初的问题，它没有修改它要从其中删除项的切片。让这个帖子中的原始答案成为到目前为止对大多数来到这个页面的人来说最好的答案。

package main

import (
    "fmt"
)

func OriginalRemoveIndex(arr []int, pos int) []int {
    new_arr := make([]int, (len(arr) - 1))
    k := 0
    for i := 0; i < (len(arr) - 1); {
        if i != pos {
            new_arr[i] = arr[k]
            k++
        } else {
            k++
        }
        i++
    }

    return new_arr
}

func main() {
    all := []int{0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9}
    fmt.Println("all: ", all) //[0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9]
    originalRemove := OriginalRemoveIndex(all, 5)

    fmt.Println("all: ", all) //[0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9]
    fmt.Println("originalRemove: ", originalRemove) //[0 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9]

    originalRemove[0] = 999
    fmt.Println("all: ", all) //[0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9]
    fmt.Println("originalRemove: ", originalRemove) //[999 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9]
}

正如您所看到的，这个输出的行为是大多数人所期望的，可能是大多数人想要的。对originalRemove的修改并不会导致所有的变化，删除索引并为其赋值的操作也不会导致变化!太棒了!

这段代码有点长，所以上面的代码可以改成这样。

正确答案

package main

import (
    "fmt"
)

func RemoveIndex(s []int, index int) []int {
    ret := make([]int, 0)
    ret = append(ret, s[:index]...)
    return append(ret, s[index+1:]...)
}

func main() {
    all := []int{0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9}
    fmt.Println("all: ", all) //[0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9]
    removeIndex := RemoveIndex(all, 5)

    fmt.Println("all: ", all) //[0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9]
    fmt.Println("removeIndex: ", removeIndex) //[0 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9]

    removeIndex[0] = 999
    fmt.Println("all: ", all) //[0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 9]
    fmt.Println("removeIndex: ", removeIndex) //[999 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9]
}

几乎与原来的删除索引解决方案相同，但是我们在返回之前添加了一个新的切片。

也许你可以试试这个方法:

// DelEleInSlice delete an element from slice by index
//  - arr: the reference of slice
//  - index: the index of element will be deleted
func DelEleInSlice(arr interface{}, index int) {
    vField := reflect.ValueOf(arr)
    value := vField.Elem()
    if value.Kind() == reflect.Slice || value.Kind() == reflect.Array {
        result := reflect.AppendSlice(value.Slice(0, index), value.Slice(index+1, value.Len()))
        value.Set(result)
    }
}

用法:

arrInt := []int{0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5}
arrStr := []string{"0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5"}
DelEleInSlice(&arrInt, 3)
DelEleInSlice(&arrStr, 4)
fmt.Println(arrInt)
fmt.Println(arrStr)

结果:

0, 1, 2, 4, 5
"0", "1", "2", "3", "5"