我在Android O操作系统上使用服务类。
我计划在后台使用服务。
Android文档指出
如果你的应用程序的API级别为26或更高，系统会对使用或创建后台服务施加限制，除非应用程序本身在前台。如果应用程序需要创建前台服务，应用程序应该调用startForegroundService()。
如果使用startForegroundService()，服务抛出以下错误。
Context.startForegroundService() did not then call
Service.startForeground()
这有什么问题?
当前回答
因为每个来这里的人都遭受着同样的痛苦，我想分享我的解决方法，之前没有人尝试过(在这个问题中)。我可以向您保证，它是工作的，甚至在一个停止的断点上确认这个方法。
问题是调用服务。start前台(id, notification)来自服务本身，对吧?不幸的是，Android框架不保证调用服务。Service.onCreate()中的start前台(id, notification)在5秒内，但无论如何都会抛出异常，所以我想出了这种方法。
Bind the service to a context with a binder from the service before calling Context.startForegroundService() If the bind is successful, call Context.startForegroundService() from the service connection and immediately call Service.startForeground() inside the service connection. IMPORTANT NOTE: Call the Context.bindService() method inside a try-catch because in some occasions the call can throw an exception, in which case you need to rely on calling Context.startForegroundService() directly and hope it will not fail. An example can be a broadcast receiver context, however getting application context does not throw an exception in that case, but using the context directly does.
这甚至可以在我绑定服务后和触发“startForeground”调用之前等待断点时工作。等待3-4秒不会触发异常，而5秒后会抛出异常。(如果设备不能在5秒内执行两行代码，那么就该把它扔进垃圾桶了。)
因此，首先创建一个服务连接。
// Create the service connection.
ServiceConnection connection = new ServiceConnection()
{
@Override
public void onServiceConnected(ComponentName name, IBinder service)
{
// The binder of the service that returns the instance that is created.
MyService.LocalBinder binder = (MyService.LocalBinder) service;
// The getter method to acquire the service.
MyService myService = binder.getService();
// getServiceIntent(context) returns the relative service intent
context.startForegroundService(getServiceIntent(context));
// This is the key: Without waiting Android Framework to call this method
// inside Service.onCreate(), immediately call here to post the notification.
myService.startForeground(myNotificationId, MyService.getNotification());
// Release the connection to prevent leaks.
context.unbindService(this);
}
@Override
public void onBindingDied(ComponentName name)
{
Log.w(TAG, "Binding has dead.");
}
@Override
public void onNullBinding(ComponentName name)
{
Log.w(TAG, "Bind was null.");
}
@Override
public void onServiceDisconnected(ComponentName name)
{
Log.w(TAG, "Service is disconnected..");
}
};
在服务内部，创建一个返回服务实例的绑定器。
public class MyService extends Service
{
public class LocalBinder extends Binder
{
public MyService getService()
{
return MyService.this;
}
}
// Create the instance on the service.
private final LocalBinder binder = new LocalBinder();
// Return this instance from onBind method.
// You may also return new LocalBinder() which is
// basically the same thing.
@Nullable
@Override
public IBinder onBind(Intent intent)
{
return binder;
}
}
然后，尝试从该上下文中绑定服务。如果成功，它将从您正在使用的服务连接调用serviceconnection . onserviceconnconnected()方法。然后，处理上面所示代码中的逻辑。示例代码如下所示:
// Try to bind the service
try
{
context.bindService(getServiceIntent(context), connection,
Context.BIND_AUTO_CREATE);
}
catch (RuntimeException ignored)
{
// This is probably a broadcast receiver context even though we are calling getApplicationContext().
// Just call startForegroundService instead since we cannot bind a service to a
// broadcast receiver context. The service also have to call startForeground in
// this case.
context.startForegroundService(getServiceIntent(context));
}
它似乎在我开发的应用程序上工作，所以当你尝试时它应该也能工作。
其他回答
我也面临着同样的问题，花时间找到了一个解决方案，你可以尝试下面的代码。如果你使用服务，然后把这段代码放在onCreate，否则你使用意图服务，然后把这段代码放在onHandleIntent。
if (Build.VERSION.SDK_INT >= 26) {
String CHANNEL_ID = "my_app";
NotificationChannel channel = new NotificationChannel(CHANNEL_ID,
"MyApp", NotificationManager.IMPORTANCE_DEFAULT);
((NotificationManager) getSystemService(Context.NOTIFICATION_SERVICE)).createNotificationChannel(channel);
Notification notification = new NotificationCompat.Builder(this, CHANNEL_ID)
.setContentTitle("")
.setContentText("").build();
startForeground(1, notification);
}
因为每个来这里的人都遭受着同样的痛苦，我想分享我的解决方法，之前没有人尝试过(在这个问题中)。我可以向您保证，它是工作的，甚至在一个停止的断点上确认这个方法。
问题是调用服务。start前台(id, notification)来自服务本身，对吧?不幸的是，Android框架不保证调用服务。Service.onCreate()中的start前台(id, notification)在5秒内，但无论如何都会抛出异常，所以我想出了这种方法。
Bind the service to a context with a binder from the service before calling Context.startForegroundService() If the bind is successful, call Context.startForegroundService() from the service connection and immediately call Service.startForeground() inside the service connection. IMPORTANT NOTE: Call the Context.bindService() method inside a try-catch because in some occasions the call can throw an exception, in which case you need to rely on calling Context.startForegroundService() directly and hope it will not fail. An example can be a broadcast receiver context, however getting application context does not throw an exception in that case, but using the context directly does.
这甚至可以在我绑定服务后和触发“startForeground”调用之前等待断点时工作。等待3-4秒不会触发异常，而5秒后会抛出异常。(如果设备不能在5秒内执行两行代码，那么就该把它扔进垃圾桶了。)
因此，首先创建一个服务连接。
// Create the service connection.
ServiceConnection connection = new ServiceConnection()
{
@Override
public void onServiceConnected(ComponentName name, IBinder service)
{
// The binder of the service that returns the instance that is created.
MyService.LocalBinder binder = (MyService.LocalBinder) service;
// The getter method to acquire the service.
MyService myService = binder.getService();
// getServiceIntent(context) returns the relative service intent
context.startForegroundService(getServiceIntent(context));
// This is the key: Without waiting Android Framework to call this method
// inside Service.onCreate(), immediately call here to post the notification.
myService.startForeground(myNotificationId, MyService.getNotification());
// Release the connection to prevent leaks.
context.unbindService(this);
}
@Override
public void onBindingDied(ComponentName name)
{
Log.w(TAG, "Binding has dead.");
}
@Override
public void onNullBinding(ComponentName name)
{
Log.w(TAG, "Bind was null.");
}
@Override
public void onServiceDisconnected(ComponentName name)
{
Log.w(TAG, "Service is disconnected..");
}
};
在服务内部，创建一个返回服务实例的绑定器。
public class MyService extends Service
{
public class LocalBinder extends Binder
{
public MyService getService()
{
return MyService.this;
}
}
// Create the instance on the service.
private final LocalBinder binder = new LocalBinder();
// Return this instance from onBind method.
// You may also return new LocalBinder() which is
// basically the same thing.
@Nullable
@Override
public IBinder onBind(Intent intent)
{
return binder;
}
}
然后，尝试从该上下文中绑定服务。如果成功，它将从您正在使用的服务连接调用serviceconnection . onserviceconnconnected()方法。然后，处理上面所示代码中的逻辑。示例代码如下所示:
// Try to bind the service
try
{
context.bindService(getServiceIntent(context), connection,
Context.BIND_AUTO_CREATE);
}
catch (RuntimeException ignored)
{
// This is probably a broadcast receiver context even though we are calling getApplicationContext().
// Just call startForegroundService instead since we cannot bind a service to a
// broadcast receiver context. The service also have to call startForeground in
// this case.
context.startForegroundService(getServiceIntent(context));
}
它似乎在我开发的应用程序上工作，所以当你尝试时它应该也能工作。
我在Pixel 3和Android 11中遇到了一个问题，当我的服务运行得很短时，前台通知没有被取消。
在stopForeground() stopSelf()之前添加100ms的延迟似乎有所帮助。
人们在这里写道，stopprospect()应该在stopSelf()之前被调用。我不能确认，但我猜它不会费心去做。
public class AService extends Service {
@Override
public void onCreate() {
if (Build.VERSION.SDK_INT >= Build.VERSION_CODES.Q) {
startForeground(
getForegroundNotificationId(),
channelManager.buildBackgroundInfoNotification(getNotificationTitle(), getNotificationText()),
ServiceInfo.FOREGROUND_SERVICE_TYPE_DATA_SYNC);
} else {
startForeground(getForegroundNotificationId(),
channelManager.buildBackgroundInfoNotification(getNotificationTitle(), getNotificationText())
);
}
@Override
public int onStartCommand(Intent intent, int flags, int startId) {
startForeground();
if (hasQueueMoreItems()) {
startWorkerThreads();
} else {
stopForeground(true);
stopSelf();
}
return START_STICKY;
}
private class WorkerRunnable implements Runnable {
@Override
public void run() {
while (getItem() != null && !isLoopInterrupted) {
doSomething(getItem())
}
waitALittle();
stopForeground(true);
stopSelf();
}
private void waitALittle() {
try {
Thread.sleep(100);
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
}
}
即使在Service中调用start前台之后，如果我们在onCreate调用之前调用stopService，它也会在某些设备上崩溃。 所以，我通过启动附加标志的服务来修复这个问题:
Intent intent = new Intent(context, YourService.class);
intent.putExtra("request_stop", true);
context.startService(intent);
并在onStartCommand中添加了一个检查，看看它是否已经开始停止:
@Override
public int onStartCommand(Intent intent, int flags, int startId) {
//call startForeground first
if (intent != null) {
boolean stopService = intent.getBooleanExtra("request_stop", false);
if (stopService) {
stopSelf();
}
}
//Continue with the background task
return START_STICKY;
}
附注:如果服务没有运行，它将首先启动服务，这是一种开销。
很多答案，但没有一个对我有用。
我已经开始这样服务了。
if (Build.VERSION.SDK_INT >= Build.VERSION_CODES.O) {
startForegroundService(intent);
} else {
startService(intent);
}
在我的服务在onStartCommand
if (Build.VERSION.SDK_INT >= Build.VERSION_CODES.O) {
Notification.Builder builder = new Notification.Builder(this, ANDROID_CHANNEL_ID)
.setContentTitle(getString(R.string.app_name))
.setContentText("SmartTracker Running")
.setAutoCancel(true);
Notification notification = builder.build();
startForeground(NOTIFICATION_ID, notification);
} else {
NotificationCompat.Builder builder = new NotificationCompat.Builder(this)
.setContentTitle(getString(R.string.app_name))
.setContentText("SmartTracker is Running...")
.setPriority(NotificationCompat.PRIORITY_DEFAULT)
.setAutoCancel(true);
Notification notification = builder.build();
startForeground(NOTIFICATION_ID, notification);
}
不要忘记将NOTIFICATION_ID设置为非零
private static final String ANDROID_CHANNEL_ID = "com.xxxx.Location.Channel";
private static final int NOTIFICATION_ID = 555;
所以一切都是完美的，但仍然崩溃在8.1，所以原因如下。
if (Build.VERSION.SDK_INT >= Build.VERSION_CODES.O) {
stopForeground(true);
} else {
stopForeground(true);
}
我已经调用停止前台删除通知，但一旦通知删除服务成为后台和后台服务不能从后台运行在android O。在收到推送后启动。
神奇的词是
stopSelf();
到目前为止，任何原因你的服务崩溃遵循以上所有步骤，并享受。
