即使在Service中调用start前台之后，如果我们在onCreate调用之前调用stopService，它也会在某些设备上崩溃。 所以，我通过启动附加标志的服务来修复这个问题:

Intent intent = new Intent(context, YourService.class);
intent.putExtra("request_stop", true);
context.startService(intent);

并在onStartCommand中添加了一个检查，看看它是否已经开始停止:

@Override
public int onStartCommand(Intent intent, int flags, int startId) {
    //call startForeground first
    if (intent != null) {
        boolean stopService = intent.getBooleanExtra("request_stop", false);
        if (stopService) {
            stopSelf();
        }
    }

    //Continue with the background task
    return START_STICKY;
}

附注:如果服务没有运行，它将首先启动服务，这是一种开销。

以下是谷歌在Android 8.0上的行为变化:

系统允许应用程序调用Context.startForegroundService()，即使应用程序处于后台。但是，应用程序必须在服务创建后的5秒内调用该服务的startForeground()方法。

解决方案: 在onCreate()中为你使用的服务调用start前台()

请参见:Android 8.0 (Oreo)的后台执行限制

我只是检查PendingIntent null或或不是之前调用 context.startForegroundService (service_intent)功能。

这对我很有用

PendingIntent pendingIntent=PendingIntent.getBroadcast(context,0,intent,PendingIntent.FLAG_NO_CREATE);

if (Build.VERSION.SDK_INT >= Build.VERSION_CODES.O && pendingIntent==null){
            context.startForegroundService(service_intent);
        }
        else
        {
            context.startService(service_intent);
        }
}

服务

class TestService : Service() {

    override fun onCreate() {
        super.onCreate()
        Log.d(TAG, "onCreate")

        val nBuilder = NotificationCompat.Builder(this, "all")
            .setSmallIcon(R.drawable.ic_launcher_foreground)
            .setContentTitle("TestService")
            .setPriority(NotificationCompat.PRIORITY_DEFAULT)
        startForeground(1337, nBuilder.build())
    }

    override fun onStartCommand(intent: Intent?, flags: Int, startId: Int): Int {
        val rtn = super.onStartCommand(intent, flags, startId)

        if (intent?.action == STOP_ACTION) {
            Log.d(TAG, "onStartCommand -> STOP")
            stopForeground(true)
            stopSelf()
        } else {
            Log.d(TAG, "onStartCommand -> START")
        }

        return rtn
    }

    override fun onDestroy() {
        Log.d(TAG, "onDestroy")
        super.onDestroy()
    }

    override fun onBind(intent: Intent?): IBinder? = null

    companion object {

        private val TAG = "TestService"
        private val STOP_ACTION = "ly.zen.test.TestService.ACTION_STOP"

        fun start(context: Context) {
            ContextCompat.startForegroundService(context, Intent(context, TestService::class.java))
        }

        fun stop(context: Context) {
            val intent = Intent(context, TestService::class.java)
            intent.action = STOP_ACTION
            ContextCompat.startForegroundService(context, intent)
        }

    }

}

测试人员

val nChannel = NotificationChannel("all", "All", NotificationManager.IMPORTANCE_NONE)
val nManager = getSystemService(Context.NOTIFICATION_SERVICE) as NotificationManager
nManager.createNotificationChannel(nChannel)

start_test_service.setOnClickListener {
    TestService.start(this@MainActivity)
    TestService.stop(this@MainActivity)
}

结果

D/TestService: onCreate
D/TestService: onStartCommand -> START
D/TestService: onStartCommand -> STOP
D/TestService: onDestroy

我已经修复了用startService(intent)而不是context . start前台()启动服务的问题，并在super.OnCreate()之后立即调用start前台()。此外，如果您在引导时启动服务，您可以启动在引导广播时启动服务的Activity。虽然这不是一个永久的解决方案，但它是有效的。

好吧，我注意到的一些东西可能也会对其他人有所帮助。这是严格的测试，看看我是否能找出如何解决我所看到的事件。为了简单起见，假设我有一个从演示者调用这个的方法。

context.startForegroundService(new Intent(context, TaskQueueExecutorService.class));

try {
    Thread.sleep(10000);
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
    e.printStackTrace();
}       

这将导致同样的错误。在方法完成之前，服务不会启动，因此服务中没有onCreate()。

So even if you update the UI off the main thread, IF you have anything that might hold up that method after it, it won't start on time and give you the dreaded Foreground Error. In my case we were loading some things onto a queue and each called startForegroundService, but some logic was involved with each in the background. So if the logic took too long to finish that method since they were called back to back, crash time. The old startService just ignored it and went on it's way and since we called it each time, the next round would finish up.

这让我想知道，如果我从后台线程调用服务，它是否可以在启动时完全绑定并立即运行，因此我开始试验。即使这样不会立即启动，它也不会崩溃。

new Handler(Looper.getMainLooper()).post(new Runnable() {
        public void run() {
               context.startForegroundService(new Intent(context, 
           TaskQueueExecutorService.class));
               try {
                   Thread.sleep(10000);
               } catch (InterruptedException e) {
                  e.printStackTrace();
              }       
        }
});

我不会假装知道为什么它没有崩溃，尽管我怀疑这迫使它等待，直到主线程能够及时处理它。我知道将它绑定到主线程并不理想，但由于我的使用是在后台调用它，所以我并不真正关心它是否等待完成而不是崩溃。