有很多建议，但没有一个是使用并发的。期货，我认为这是最清晰的处理方式。

from concurrent.futures import ProcessPoolExecutor

# Warning: this does not terminate function if timeout
def timeout_five(fnc, *args, **kwargs):
    with ProcessPoolExecutor() as p:
        f = p.submit(fnc, *args, **kwargs)
        return f.result(timeout=5)

超级简单的阅读和维护。

我们创建一个池，提交一个进程，然后等待5秒，然后引发一个TimeoutError，你可以根据需要捕获和处理它。

本机为python 3.2+，并反向移植到2.7 (pip install futures)。

线程和进程之间的切换非常简单，只需将ProcessPoolExecutor替换为ThreadPoolExecutor。

如果您想在超时时终止进程，我建议您查看Pebble。

下面是对给定的基于线程的解决方案的轻微改进。

下面的代码支持异常:

def runFunctionCatchExceptions(func, *args, **kwargs):
    try:
        result = func(*args, **kwargs)
    except Exception, message:
        return ["exception", message]

    return ["RESULT", result]


def runFunctionWithTimeout(func, args=(), kwargs={}, timeout_duration=10, default=None):
    import threading
    class InterruptableThread(threading.Thread):
        def __init__(self):
            threading.Thread.__init__(self)
            self.result = default
        def run(self):
            self.result = runFunctionCatchExceptions(func, *args, **kwargs)
    it = InterruptableThread()
    it.start()
    it.join(timeout_duration)
    if it.isAlive():
        return default

    if it.result[0] == "exception":
        raise it.result[1]

    return it.result[1]

用5秒超时调用它:

result = timeout(remote_calculate, (myarg,), timeout_duration=5)

我也遇到过同样的问题，但我的情况是需要在子线程上工作，信号不适合我，所以我写了一个python包:timeout-timer来解决这个问题，支持用作上下文或装饰器，使用信号或子线程模块来触发超时中断:

from timeout_timer import timeout, TimeoutInterrupt

class TimeoutInterruptNested(TimeoutInterrupt):
    pass

def test_timeout_nested_loop_both_timeout(timer="thread"):
    cnt = 0
    try:
        with timeout(5, timer=timer):
            try:
                with timeout(2, timer=timer, exception=TimeoutInterruptNested):
                    sleep(2)
            except TimeoutInterruptNested:
                cnt += 1
            time.sleep(10)
    except TimeoutInterrupt:
        cnt += 1
    assert cnt == 2

查看更多信息:https://github.com/dozysun/timeout-timer

我需要一个不会被时间阻塞的可嵌套定时中断(SIGALARM不能做到)。Sleep(基于线程的方法不能做到)。我最终复制了这里的代码并对其进行了轻微修改:http://code.activestate.com/recipes/577600-queue-for-managing-multiple-sigalrm-alarms-concurr/

代码本身:

#!/usr/bin/python

# lightly modified version of http://code.activestate.com/recipes/577600-queue-for-managing-multiple-sigalrm-alarms-concurr/


"""alarm.py: Permits multiple SIGALRM events to be queued.

Uses a `heapq` to store the objects to be called when an alarm signal is
raised, so that the next alarm is always at the top of the heap.
"""

import heapq
import signal
from time import time

__version__ = '$Revision: 2539 $'.split()[1]

alarmlist = []

__new_alarm = lambda t, f, a, k: (t + time(), f, a, k)
__next_alarm = lambda: int(round(alarmlist[0][0] - time())) if alarmlist else None
__set_alarm = lambda: signal.alarm(max(__next_alarm(), 1))


class TimeoutError(Exception):
    def __init__(self, message, id_=None):
        self.message = message
        self.id_ = id_


class Timeout:
    ''' id_ allows for nested timeouts. '''
    def __init__(self, id_=None, seconds=1, error_message='Timeout'):
        self.seconds = seconds
        self.error_message = error_message
        self.id_ = id_
    def handle_timeout(self):
        raise TimeoutError(self.error_message, self.id_)
    def __enter__(self):
        self.this_alarm = alarm(self.seconds, self.handle_timeout)
    def __exit__(self, type, value, traceback):
        try:
            cancel(self.this_alarm) 
        except ValueError:
            pass


def __clear_alarm():
    """Clear an existing alarm.

    If the alarm signal was set to a callable other than our own, queue the
    previous alarm settings.
    """
    oldsec = signal.alarm(0)
    oldfunc = signal.signal(signal.SIGALRM, __alarm_handler)
    if oldsec > 0 and oldfunc != __alarm_handler:
        heapq.heappush(alarmlist, (__new_alarm(oldsec, oldfunc, [], {})))


def __alarm_handler(*zargs):
    """Handle an alarm by calling any due heap entries and resetting the alarm.

    Note that multiple heap entries might get called, especially if calling an
    entry takes a lot of time.
    """
    try:
        nextt = __next_alarm()
        while nextt is not None and nextt <= 0:
            (tm, func, args, keys) = heapq.heappop(alarmlist)
            func(*args, **keys)
            nextt = __next_alarm()
    finally:
        if alarmlist: __set_alarm()


def alarm(sec, func, *args, **keys):
    """Set an alarm.

    When the alarm is raised in `sec` seconds, the handler will call `func`,
    passing `args` and `keys`. Return the heap entry (which is just a big
    tuple), so that it can be cancelled by calling `cancel()`.
    """
    __clear_alarm()
    try:
        newalarm = __new_alarm(sec, func, args, keys)
        heapq.heappush(alarmlist, newalarm)
        return newalarm
    finally:
        __set_alarm()


def cancel(alarm):
    """Cancel an alarm by passing the heap entry returned by `alarm()`.

    It is an error to try to cancel an alarm which has already occurred.
    """
    __clear_alarm()
    try:
        alarmlist.remove(alarm)
        heapq.heapify(alarmlist)
    finally:
        if alarmlist: __set_alarm()

还有一个用法示例:

import alarm
from time import sleep

try:
    with alarm.Timeout(id_='a', seconds=5):
        try:
            with alarm.Timeout(id_='b', seconds=2):
                sleep(3)
        except alarm.TimeoutError as e:
            print 'raised', e.id_
        sleep(30)
except alarm.TimeoutError as e:
    print 'raised', e.id_
else:
    print 'nope.'

你可以使用多处理。过程来做到这一点。

Code

import multiprocessing
import time

# bar
def bar():
    for i in range(100):
        print "Tick"
        time.sleep(1)

if __name__ == '__main__':
    # Start bar as a process
    p = multiprocessing.Process(target=bar)
    p.start()

    # Wait for 10 seconds or until process finishes
    p.join(10)

    # If thread is still active
    if p.is_alive():
        print "running... let's kill it..."

        # Terminate - may not work if process is stuck for good
        p.terminate()
        # OR Kill - will work for sure, no chance for process to finish nicely however
        # p.kill()

        p.join()

我是wrapt_timeout_decorator的作者。

这里介绍的大多数解决方案乍一看在Linux下都工作得很好——因为我们有fork()和signals()——但在windows上看起来有点不同。 当涉及到Linux上的子线程时，你不能再使用信号了。

为了在Windows下生成一个进程，它需要是可pickle的——许多装饰函数或Class方法都不是。

所以你需要使用一个更好的pickler像莳萝和multiprocess(不是pickle和multiprocessing) -这就是为什么你不能使用ProcessPoolExecutor(或只有有限的功能)。

For the timeout itself - You need to define what timeout means - because on Windows it will take considerable (and not determinable) time to spawn the process. This can be tricky on short timeouts. Lets assume, spawning the process takes about 0.5 seconds (easily !!!). If You give a timeout of 0.2 seconds what should happen? Should the function time out after 0.5 + 0.2 seconds (so let the method run for 0.2 seconds)? Or should the called process time out after 0.2 seconds (in that case, the decorated function will ALWAYS timeout, because in that time it is not even spawned)?

嵌套的装饰器也很讨厌，你不能在子线程中使用信号。如果你想要创建一个真正通用的、跨平台的装饰器，所有这些都需要考虑(并测试)。

其他问题是将异常传递回调用者，以及记录问题(如果在装饰函数中使用-不支持记录到另一个进程中的文件)

我试图涵盖所有的边缘情况，您可以查看包wrapt_timeout_decorator，或者至少测试您自己的解决方案，受到那里使用的单元测试的启发。

@Alexis Eggermont -不幸的是，我没有足够的分数来评论-也许其他人可以通知你-我认为我解决了你的进口问题。