大部分答案与循环有关。但我的问题不同。当我试图在同一范围内使用多个dbcontext.Savechanges()命令时，我多次得到错误。

在我的案例中使用ef core 3.1

dbcontext.Database.BeginTransaction () 而且 dbcontext.Database.CommitTransaction ();

已经解决了问题。以下是我的全部代码:

 public IActionResult ApplyForCourse()
    {

        var master = _userService.GetMasterFromCurrentUser();

            var trainee = new Trainee
            {
                CourseId = courseId,
                JobStatus = model.JobStatus,
                Gender = model.Gender,
                Name = model.Name,
                Surname = model.Surname,
                Telephone = model.Telephone,
                Email = model.Email,
                BirthDate = model.BirthDate,
                Description = model.Description,
                EducationStatus = EducationStatus.AppliedForEducation,
                TraineeType = TraineeType.SiteFirst

            };


            dbcontext.Trainees.Add(trainee);
            dbcontext.SaveChanges();

         
            dbcontext.Database.BeginTransaction();
            var user = userManager.GetUserAsync(User).Result;
            master.TraineeId = trainee.Id;
            master.DateOfBirth = model.BirthDate;
            master.EducationStatus = trainee.EducationStatus;
            user.Gender = model.Gender;
            user.Email = model.Email;
            dbcontext.Database.CommitTransaction();
            dbcontext.SaveChanges();
 
            return RedirectToAction("Index", "Home");

        }


    }

我迟到了很久，但今天我遇到了同样的错误，我解决的方法很简单。我的场景类似于这个给定的代码，我在嵌套的for-each循环中制作DB事务。

问题是，单个DB事务比for-each循环花费的时间要长一点，所以一旦之前的事务没有完成，那么新的牵引力就会抛出异常，所以解决方案是在for-each循环中创建一个新对象，在那里您正在进行DB事务。

对于上述场景，解决方案如下:

foreach (RivWorks.Model.Negotiation.AutoNegotiationDetails companyFeedDetail in companyFeedDetailList)
                {
private RivWorks.Model.Negotiation.RIV_Entities _dbRiv = RivWorks.Model.Stores.RivEntities(AppSettings.RivWorkEntities_connString);
                    if (companyFeedDetail.FeedSourceTable.ToUpper() == "AUTO")
                    {
                        var company = (from a in _dbRiv.Company.Include("Product") where a.CompanyId == companyFeedDetail.CompanyId select a).First();
                        foreach (RivWorks.Model.NegotiationAutos.Auto sourceProduct in client.Auto)
                        {
                            foreach (RivWorks.Model.Negotiation.Product targetProduct in company.Product)
                            {
                                if (targetProduct.alternateProductID == sourceProduct.AutoID)
                                {
                                    found = true;
                                    break;
                                }
                            }
                            if (!found)
                            {
                                var newProduct = new RivWorks.Model.Negotiation.Product();
                                newProduct.alternateProductID = sourceProduct.AutoID;
                                newProduct.isFromFeed = true;
                                newProduct.isDeleted = false;
                                newProduct.SKU = sourceProduct.StockNumber;
                                company.Product.Add(newProduct);
                            }
                        }
                        _dbRiv.SaveChanges();  // ### THIS BREAKS ### //
                    }
                }

I was getting this same issue but in a different situation. I had a list of items in a list box. The user can click an item and select delete but I am using a stored proc to delete the item because there is a lot of logic involved in deleting the item. When I call the stored proc the delete works fine but any future call to SaveChanges will cause the error. My solution was to call the stored proc outside of EF and this worked fine. For some reason when I call the stored proc using the EF way of doing things it leaves something open.

下面是另外两个选项，允许您在for每个循环中调用SaveChanges()。

第一个选项是使用一个DBContext来生成要遍历的列表对象，然后创建第二个DBContext来调用SaveChanges()。这里有一个例子:

//Get your IQueryable list of objects from your main DBContext(db)    
IQueryable<Object> objects = db.Object.Where(whatever where clause you desire);

//Create a new DBContext outside of the foreach loop    
using (DBContext dbMod = new DBContext())
{   
    //Loop through the IQueryable       
    foreach (Object object in objects)
    {
        //Get the same object you are operating on in the foreach loop from the new DBContext(dbMod) using the objects id           
        Object objectMod = dbMod.Object.Find(object.id);

        //Make whatever changes you need on objectMod
        objectMod.RightNow = DateTime.Now;

        //Invoke SaveChanges() on the dbMod context         
        dbMod.SaveChanges()
    }
}

第二个选项是从DBContext中获取一个数据库对象列表，但是只选择id。然后遍历id列表(假设是int类型)，获得与每个int类型对应的对象，并以这种方式调用SaveChanges()。这个方法背后的思想是获取一个大的整数列表，这比获取一个大的db对象列表并对整个对象调用. tolist()要有效得多。下面是这个方法的一个例子:

//Get the list of objects you want from your DBContext, and select just the Id's and create a list
List<int> Ids = db.Object.Where(enter where clause here)Select(m => m.Id).ToList();

var objects = Ids.Select(id => db.Objects.Find(id));

foreach (var object in objects)
{
    object.RightNow = DateTime.Now;
    db.SaveChanges()
}

我知道这是一个老问题，但我今天遇到了这个错误。

我发现，当数据库表触发器得到一个错误时，这个错误可以被抛出。

作为您的信息，当您遇到这个错误时，您也可以检查您的tables触发器。

我的情况和上面其他人差不多。我有一个IQueryable，我正在做一个foreach。这又调用了一个带有SaveChanges()的方法。此处出现boom异常，因为上面的查询已经打开了一个事务。

// Example:

var myList = _context.Table.Where(x => x.time == null);

foreach(var i in myList)
{
    MyFunction(i); // <<-- Has _context.SaveChanges() which throws exception
}

在我的案例中，将ToList()添加到查询的末尾是解决方案。

// Fix
var myList = _context.Table.Where(x => x.time == null).ToList();