根据我的经验，这最好是一个社会工程问题，而不是一个编程问题。与其专注于让作弊变得不可能，不如专注于通过消除作弊动机来让它变得无聊。例如，如果主要动机是公开可见的高分，那么简单地延迟高分的显示时间就可以通过消除作弊者的正反馈循环来显著减少作弊。

根据我的经验，这最好是一个社会工程问题，而不是一个编程问题。与其专注于让作弊变得不可能，不如专注于通过消除作弊动机来让它变得无聊。例如，如果主要动机是公开可见的高分，那么简单地延迟高分的显示时间就可以通过消除作弊者的正反馈循环来显著减少作弊。

It is only possible by keeping the all game logic at server-side which also stores the score internally without knowledge of the user. For economical and scientific reasons, mankind can not apply this theory to all game types excluding turn-based. For e.g. keeping physics at server-side is computationally expensive and hard to get responsive as speed of hand. Even possible, while playing chess anyone can match AI chess gameplay to opponent. Therefore, better multiplayer games should also contain on-demand creativity.

没有办法使它完全不可攻击，因为它很容易反编译swf，一个熟练的开发黑客可以跟踪您的代码，并找出如何绕过您可能使用的任何加密系统。

如果你只是想通过使用TamperData这样的简单工具来阻止孩子作弊，那么你可以生成一个加密密钥，在启动时传递给SWF。然后，在将高分传递回PHP代码之前，使用http://code.google.com/p/as3crypto/之类的东西对高分进行加密。然后在服务器端解密，然后将其存储到数据库中。

The way that a new popular arcade mod does it is that it sends data from the flash to php, back to flash (or reloads it), then back to php. This allows you to do anything you want to compare the data as well bypass post data/decryption hacks and the like. One way that it does this is by assigning 2 randomized values from php into the flash (which you cannot grab or see even if running a realtime flash data grabber), using a mathematical formula to add the score with the random values then checking it using the same formula to reverse it to see if the score matches it when it finally goes to the php at the end. These random values are never visible as well as it also times the transaction taking place and if it's any more than a couple seconds then it also flags it as cheating because it assumes you have stopped the send to try to figure out the randomized values or run the numbers through some type of cipher to return possible random values to compare with the score value.

如果你问我，这似乎是一个很好的解决方案，有人认为使用这种方法有什么问题吗?或者可能的解决方法?

I made kind of workaround... I had a gave where scores incremented ( you always get +1 score ). First, I started to count from random num (let's say 14 ) and when I display the scores, just showed the scores var minus 14. This was so if the crackers are looking for example for 20, they won't find it ( it will be 34 in the memory ). Second, since I know what the next point should be... I used adobe crypto library, to create the hash of what the next point should be. When I have to increment the scores, I check if the hash of the incremented scores is equal to the hash is should be. If the cracker have changed the points in the memory, the hashes are not equal. I perform some server-side verification and when I got different points from game and from the PHP, I know that cheating were involved. Here is snippet ot my code ( I'm using Adobe Crypto libraty MD5 class and random cryptography salt. callPhp() is my server side validation )

private function addPoint(event:Event = null):void{
            trace("expectedHash: " + expectedHash + "  || new hash: " + MD5.hash( Number(SCORES + POINT).toString() + expectedHashSalt) );
            if(expectedHash == MD5.hash( Number(SCORES + POINT).toString() + expectedHashSalt)){
                SCORES +=POINT;
                callPhp();
                expectedHash = MD5.hash( Number(SCORES + POINT).toString() + expectedHashSalt);
            } else {
                //trace("cheat engine usage");
            }
        }

使用这种技术+ SWF混淆，我能够阻止饼干。此外，当我将分数发送到服务器端时，我使用自己的小型加密/解密功能。类似这样的代码(服务器端代码不包括在内，但你可以看到算法并用PHP编写):

package  {

    import bassta.utils.Hash;

    public class ScoresEncoder {

        private static var ranChars:Array;
        private static var charsTable:Hash;

        public function ScoresEncoder() {

        }

        public static function init():void{

            ranChars = String("qwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnm").split("")

            charsTable = new Hash({
                "0": "x",
                "1": "f",
                "2": "q",
                "3": "z",
                "4": "a",
                "5": "o",
                "6": "n",
                "7": "p",
                "8": "w",
                "9": "y"

            });

        }

        public static function encodeScore(_s:Number):String{

            var _fin:String = "";

            var scores:String = addLeadingZeros(_s);
            for(var i:uint = 0; i< scores.length; i++){
                //trace( scores.charAt(i) + " - > " + charsTable[ scores.charAt(i) ] );
                _fin += charsTable[ scores.charAt(i) ];
            }

            return _fin;

        }

        public static function decodeScore(_s:String):String{

            var _fin:String = "";

            var decoded:String = _s;

            for(var i:uint = 0; i< decoded.length; i++){
                //trace( decoded.charAt(i) + " - > "  + charsTable.getKey( decoded.charAt(i) ) );
                _fin += charsTable.getKey( decoded.charAt(i) );
            }

            return _fin;

        }

        public static function encodeScoreRand(_s:Number):String{
            var _fin:String = "";

            _fin += generateRandomChars(10) + encodeScore(_s) + generateRandomChars(3)

            return _fin;
        }

        public static function decodeScoreRand(_s:String):Number{

            var decodedString:String = _s;
            var decoded:Number;

            decodedString = decodedString.substring(10,13);         
            decodedString = decodeScore(decodedString);

            decoded = Number(decodedString);

            return decoded;
        }

        public static function generateRandomChars(_length:Number):String{

            var newRandChars:String = "";

            for(var i:uint = 0; i< _length; i++){
                newRandChars+= ranChars[ Math.ceil( Math.random()*ranChars.length-1 )];
            }

            return newRandChars;
        }

        private static function addLeadingZeros(_s:Number):String{

            var _fin:String;

            if(_s < 10 ){
                 _fin = "00" + _s.toString();
            }

            if(_s >= 10 && _s < 99 ) {
                 _fin = "0" + _s.toString();
            }

            if(_s >= 100 ) {
                _fin = _s.toString();
            }           

            return _fin;
        }


    }//end
}

然后我把这个变量和其他的假变量一起发送，它就会迷失在其中…对于小型flash游戏来说，这是一项艰巨的任务，但当涉及到奖品时，有些人就会变得贪婪。如果你需要任何帮助，给我写个便条。

欢呼,图标