这是为初学者准备的，

在运行脚本之前，Python会自动将脚本编译为已编译的代码，即所谓的字节代码。

运行脚本不被认为是导入，也不会创建.pyc。

例如，如果你有一个脚本文件abc.py，它导入了另一个模块xyz.py，当你运行abc.py时，xyz.py, xyz.py。Pyc将被创建，因为xyz被导入，但没有abc。Pyc文件将被创建，因为abc.py没有被导入。

如果你需要为一个未导入的模块创建一个.pyc文件，你可以使用py_compile和compileall模块。

py_compile模块可以手动编译任何模块。一种方法是交互式地使用该模块中的py_compile.compile函数:

>>> import py_compile
>>> py_compile.compile('abc.py')

这将把.pyc写到与abc.py相同的位置(你可以用可选参数cfile重写它)。

您还可以使用compileall模块自动编译一个或多个目录中的所有文件。

python -m compileall

如果省略目录名(本例中的当前目录)，模块将编译sys.path上的所有内容

这是为初学者准备的，

在运行脚本之前，Python会自动将脚本编译为已编译的代码，即所谓的字节代码。

运行脚本不被认为是导入，也不会创建.pyc。

例如，如果你有一个脚本文件abc.py，它导入了另一个模块xyz.py，当你运行abc.py时，xyz.py, xyz.py。Pyc将被创建，因为xyz被导入，但没有abc。Pyc文件将被创建，因为abc.py没有被导入。

如果你需要为一个未导入的模块创建一个.pyc文件，你可以使用py_compile和compileall模块。

py_compile模块可以手动编译任何模块。一种方法是交互式地使用该模块中的py_compile.compile函数:

>>> import py_compile
>>> py_compile.compile('abc.py')

这将把.pyc写到与abc.py相同的位置(你可以用可选参数cfile重写它)。

您还可以使用compileall模块自动编译一个或多个目录中的所有文件。

python -m compileall

如果省略目录名(本例中的当前目录)，模块将编译sys.path上的所有内容

它们包含字节代码，Python解释器将源代码编译为字节代码。这段代码随后由Python的虚拟机执行。

Python的文档是这样解释定义的:

Python是一种解释性语言，例如 而不是编译的 区别可能是模糊的，因为 字节码编译器的存在。 这意味着源文件可以 直接运行而不显式地运行 创建一个可执行文件，然后 运行。

Python的*.py文件只是一个文本文件，您可以在其中编写一些代码行。当你试图使用"python filename。py"来执行这个文件时

该命令调用Python虚拟机。Python虚拟机有两个组件:“编译器”和“解释器”。解释器不能直接读取*.py文件中的文本，因此该文本首先被转换为面向PVM(不是硬件，而是PVM)的字节码。PVM执行这个字节代码。*。Pyc文件也会生成，作为运行它的一部分，它会对shell或其他文件中的文件执行导入操作。

如果这个*。Pyc文件已经生成，那么每次你运行/执行你的*.py文件时，系统直接加载你的*.py文件。pyc文件，不需要任何编译(这将节省一些处理器的机器周期)。

一旦*。生成Pyc文件，不需要*.py文件，除非你编辑它。

没有解释性语言这种东西。使用解释器还是编译器纯粹是实现的特性，与语言完全无关。

每种语言都可以由解释器或编译器实现。绝大多数语言都至少有每种类型的一个实现。(例如，C和c++有解释器，JavaScript、PHP、Perl、Python和Ruby有编译器。)此外，大多数现代语言实现实际上结合了解释器和编译器(甚至多个编译器)。

A language is just a set of abstract mathematical rules. An interpreter is one of several concrete implementation strategies for a language. Those two live on completely different abstraction levels. If English were a typed language, the term "interpreted language" would be a type error. The statement "Python is an interpreted language" is not just false (because being false would imply that the statement even makes sense, even if it is wrong), it just plain doesn't make sense, because a language can never be defined as "interpreted."

特别是，如果你看一下当前现有的Python实现，这些是他们正在使用的实现策略:

IronPython: compiles to DLR trees which the DLR then compiles to CIL bytecode. What happens to the CIL bytecode depends upon which CLI VES you are running on, but Microsoft .NET, GNU Portable.NET and Novell Mono will eventually compile it to native machine code. Jython: interprets Python sourcecode until it identifies the hot code paths, which it then compiles to JVML bytecode. What happens to the JVML bytecode depends upon which JVM you are running on. Maxine will directly compile it to un-optimized native code until it identifies the hot code paths, which it then recompiles to optimized native code. HotSpot will first interpret the JVML bytecode and then eventually compile the hot code paths to optimized machine code. PyPy: compiles to PyPy bytecode, which then gets interpreted by the PyPy VM until it identifies the hot code paths which it then compiles into native code, JVML bytecode or CIL bytecode depending on which platform you are running on. CPython: compiles to CPython bytecode which it then interprets. Stackless Python: compiles to CPython bytecode which it then interprets. Unladen Swallow: compiles to CPython bytecode which it then interprets until it identifies the hot code paths which it then compiles to LLVM IR which the LLVM compiler then compiles to native machine code. Cython: compiles Python code to portable C code, which is then compiled with a standard C compiler Nuitka: compiles Python code to machine-dependent C++ code, which is then compiled with a standard C compiler

您可能会注意到，该列表中的每一个实现(加上我没有提到的其他一些实现，如tinypy、Shedskin或Psyco)都有一个编译器。事实上，据我所知，目前还没有纯解释的Python实现，没有这样的实现计划，也从来没有这样的实现。

不仅术语“解释语言”没有意义，即使你将其理解为“带有解释实现的语言”，这显然是不正确的。不管是谁告诉你的，显然他不知道自己在说什么。

特别是，您看到的.pyc文件是由CPython、Stackless Python或Unladen Swallow生成的缓存字节码文件。

tldr;它是从源代码转换而来的代码，python虚拟机将其解释为执行。

自下而上的理解:任何程序的最后阶段都是在硬件/机器上运行/执行程序的指令。下面是执行前的几个阶段:

Executing/running on CPU Converting bytecode to machine code. Machine code is the final stage of conversion. Instructions to be executed on CPU are given in machine code. Machine code can be executed directly by CPU. Converting Bytecode to machine code. Bytecode is a medium stage. It could be skipped for efficiency, but sacrificing portability. Converting Source code to bytecode. Source code is a human readable code. This is what is used when working on IDEs (code editors) such as Pycharm.

现在来看实际的情节。在进行这些阶段的任何一个阶段时，有两种方法:一次性转换[或执行]代码(又名编译)和逐行转换[或执行]代码(又名解释)。

For example, we could compile a source code to bytecode, compile bytecode to machine code, interpret machine code for execution. Some implementations of languages skip stage 3 for efficiency, i.e. compile source code into machine code and then interpret machine code for execution. Some implementations skip all middle steps and interpret the source code directly for execution. Modern languages often involve both compiling an interpreting. JAVA for example, compiles source code to bytecode [that is how JAVA source is stored, as a bytecode, compile bytecode to machine code [using JVM], and interpret machine code for execution. [Thus JVM is implemented differently for different OSs, but the same JAVA source code could be executed on different OS that have JVM installed.] Python for example, compile source code to bytecode [usually found as .pyc files accompanying the .py source codes], compile bytecode to machine code [done by a virtual machine such as PVM and the result is an executable file], interpret the machine code/executable for execution. When can we say that a language is interpreted or compiled? The answer is by looking into the approach used in execution. If it executes the machine code all at once (== compile), then it's a compiled language. On the other hand, if it executes the machine code line-by-line (==interpret) then it's an interpreted language. Therefore, JAVA and Python are interpreted languages. A confusion might occur because of the third stage, that's converting bytecode to machine code. Often this is done using a software called a virtual machine. The confusion occurs because a virtual machine acts like a machine, but it's actually not! Virtual machines are introduced for portability, having a VM on any REAL machine will allow us to execute the same source code. The approach used in most VMs [that's the third stage] is compiling, thus some people would say it's a compiled language. For the importance of VMs, we often say that such languages are both compiled and interpreted.