Python是一种解释性语言。但是为什么我的源目录包含。pyc文件,这些文件被Windows识别为“编译过的Python文件”?
当前回答
它们是由Python解释器在导入.py文件时创建的,它们包含导入模块/程序的“已编译字节码”,其思想是,如果.pyc比相应的.py文件更新,则可以在后续导入时跳过从源代码到字节码的“翻译”(只需完成一次),从而略微加快启动速度。但它仍然是被解释的。
其他回答
Python的*.py文件只是一个文本文件,您可以在其中编写一些代码行。当你试图使用"python filename。py"来执行这个文件时
该命令调用Python虚拟机。Python虚拟机有两个组件:“编译器”和“解释器”。解释器不能直接读取*.py文件中的文本,因此该文本首先被转换为面向PVM(不是硬件,而是PVM)的字节码。PVM执行这个字节代码。*。Pyc文件也会生成,作为运行它的一部分,它会对shell或其他文件中的文件执行导入操作。
如果这个*。Pyc文件已经生成,那么每次你运行/执行你的*.py文件时,系统直接加载你的*.py文件。pyc文件,不需要任何编译(这将节省一些处理器的机器周期)。
一旦*。生成Pyc文件,不需要*.py文件,除非你编辑它。
我是这么理解的 Python是一种解释性语言…
这个流行的迷因是不正确的,或者,更确切地说,是建立在对(自然)语言水平的误解之上的:类似的错误会说“圣经是一本精装书”。让我来解释一下这个比喻……
"The Bible" is "a book" in the sense of being a class of (actual, physical objects identified as) books; the books identified as "copies of the Bible" are supposed to have something fundamental in common (the contents, although even those can be in different languages, with different acceptable translations, levels of footnotes and other annotations) -- however, those books are perfectly well allowed to differ in a myriad of aspects that are not considered fundamental -- kind of binding, color of binding, font(s) used in the printing, illustrations if any, wide writable margins or not, numbers and kinds of builtin bookmarks, and so on, and so forth.
It's quite possible that a typical printing of the Bible would indeed be in hardcover binding -- after all, it's a book that's typically meant to be read over and over, bookmarked at several places, thumbed through looking for given chapter-and-verse pointers, etc, etc, and a good hardcover binding can make a given copy last longer under such use. However, these are mundane (practical) issues that cannot be used to determine whether a given actual book object is a copy of the Bible or not: paperback printings are perfectly possible!
Similarly, Python is "a language" in the sense of defining a class of language implementations which must all be similar in some fundamental respects (syntax, most semantics except those parts of those where they're explicitly allowed to differ) but are fully allowed to differ in just about every "implementation" detail -- including how they deal with the source files they're given, whether they compile the sources to some lower level forms (and, if so, which form -- and whether they save such compiled forms, to disk or elsewhere), how they execute said forms, and so forth.
The classical implementation, CPython, is often called just "Python" for short -- but it's just one of several production-quality implementations, side by side with Microsoft's IronPython (which compiles to CLR codes, i.e., ".NET"), Jython (which compiles to JVM codes), PyPy (which is written in Python itself and can compile to a huge variety of "back-end" forms including "just-in-time" generated machine language). They're all Python (=="implementations of the Python language") just like many superficially different book objects can all be Bibles (=="copies of The Bible").
If you're interested in CPython specifically: it compiles the source files into a Python-specific lower-level form (known as "bytecode"), does so automatically when needed (when there is no bytecode file corresponding to a source file, or the bytecode file is older than the source or compiled by a different Python version), usually saves the bytecode files to disk (to avoid recompiling them in the future). OTOH IronPython will typically compile to CLR codes (saving them to disk or not, depending) and Jython to JVM codes (saving them to disk or not -- it will use the .class extension if it does save them).
这些较低级别的表单然后由适当的“虚拟机”(也称为“解释器”)执行——CPython VM、. net运行时、Java VM(又名JVM)。
因此,在这个意义上(典型的实现是做什么的),Python是一种“解释型语言”,当且仅当c#和Java是:它们都有一个典型的实现策略,首先产生字节码,然后通过VM/解释器执行它。
More likely the focus is on how "heavy", slow, and high-ceremony the compilation process is. CPython is designed to compile as fast as possible, as lightweight as possible, with as little ceremony as feasible -- the compiler does very little error checking and optimization, so it can run fast and in small amounts of memory, which in turns lets it be run automatically and transparently whenever needed, without the user even needing to be aware that there is a compilation going on, most of the time. Java and C# typically accept more work during compilation (and therefore don't perform automatic compilation) in order to check errors more thoroughly and perform more optimizations. It's a continuum of gray scales, not a black or white situation, and it would be utterly arbitrary to put a threshold at some given level and say that only above that level you call it "compilation"!-)
这是为初学者准备的,
在运行脚本之前,Python会自动将脚本编译为已编译的代码,即所谓的字节代码。
运行脚本不被认为是导入,也不会创建.pyc。
例如,如果你有一个脚本文件abc.py,它导入了另一个模块xyz.py,当你运行abc.py时,xyz.py, xyz.py。Pyc将被创建,因为xyz被导入,但没有abc。Pyc文件将被创建,因为abc.py没有被导入。
如果你需要为一个未导入的模块创建一个.pyc文件,你可以使用py_compile和compileall模块。
py_compile模块可以手动编译任何模块。一种方法是交互式地使用该模块中的py_compile.compile函数:
>>> import py_compile
>>> py_compile.compile('abc.py')
这将把.pyc写到与abc.py相同的位置(你可以用可选参数cfile重写它)。
您还可以使用compileall模块自动编译一个或多个目录中的所有文件。
python -m compileall
如果省略目录名(本例中的当前目录),模块将编译sys.path上的所有内容
语言规范与语言实现的重要区别是:
语言规范只是带有语言正式规范的文档,具有上下文无关的语法和语义规则定义(如指定基本类型和作用域动态)。 语言实现只是一个程序(编译器),它根据语言的规范实现语言的使用。
Any compiler consists of two independent parts: a frontend and backend. The frontend receives the source code, validate it and translate it into an intermediate code. After that, a backend translate it to machine code to run in a physical or a virtual machine. An interpreter is a compiler, but in this case it can produce a way of executing the intermediate code directly in a virtual machine. To execute python code, its necessary transform the code in a intermediate code, after that the code is then "assembled" as bytecode that can be stored in a file.pyc, so no need to compile modules of a program every time you run it. You can view this assembled python code using:
from dis import dis
def a(): pass
dis(a)
任何人都可以用Python语言构建静态二进制的编译器,就像可以构建C语言的解释器一样。有一些工具(lex/yacc)可以简化编译器的构建过程并使之自动化。
为了加速加载模块,Python将模块的编译内容缓存在.pyc中。
CPython将源代码编译为“字节码”,出于性能考虑,当源文件发生更改时,CPython会将此字节码缓存到文件系统中。这使得Python模块的加载速度更快,因为可以绕过编译阶段。当你的源文件是foo.py时,CPython将字节代码缓存在foo.py文件中。Pyc文件就在源代码旁边。
在python3中,Python的导入机制被扩展为在每个Python包目录中的单个目录中写入和搜索字节码缓存文件。这个目录将被称为__pycache__。
下面是一个描述如何加载模块的流程图:
欲了解更多信息:
裁判:PEP3147 参考:“编译”的Python文件
推荐文章
- 有没有办法在python中做HTTP PUT
- “foo Is None”和“foo == None”之间有什么区别吗?
- 类没有对象成员
- Django模型“没有显式声明app_label”
- 熊猫能自动从CSV文件中读取日期吗?
- 在python中zip的逆函数是什么?
- 有效的方法应用多个过滤器的熊猫数据框架或系列
- 如何检索插入id后插入行在SQLite使用Python?
- 我如何在Django中添加一个CharField占位符?
- 如何在Python中获取当前执行文件的路径?
- 我如何得到“id”后插入到MySQL数据库与Python?
- super()失败,错误:TypeError "参数1必须是类型,而不是classobj"当父不继承对象
- Python内存泄漏
- 实现嵌套字典的最佳方法是什么?
- 如何在tensorflow中获得当前可用的gpu ?