你有一个只有1和0的特殊数组。一个技巧就是使用

np.mean(x)

也就是数组中1的百分比。另外,使用

np.sum(x)
np.sum(1-x)

会给出数组中1和0的绝对值。

就我个人而言，我认为: (y == 0).sum() and (y == 1).sum()

E.g.

import numpy as np
y = np.array([0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1])
num_zeros = (y == 0).sum()
num_ones = (y == 1).sum()

利用a系列提供的方法:

>>> import pandas as pd
>>> y = [0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1]
>>> pd.Series(y).value_counts()
0    8
1    4
dtype: int64

一个普遍而简单的答案是:

numpy.sum(MyArray==x)   # sum of a binary list of the occurence of x (=0 or 1) in MyArray

这将导致这完整的代码作为例子

import numpy
MyArray=numpy.array([0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1])  # array we want to search in
x=0   # the value I want to count (can be iterator, in a list, etc.)
numpy.sum(MyArray==0)   # sum of a binary list of the occurence of x in MyArray

现在，如果MyArray是多维的，你想要计算值在直线(= pattern以后)上分布的次数。

MyArray=numpy.array([[6, 1],[4, 5],[0, 7],[5, 1],[2, 5],[1, 2],[3, 2],[0, 2],[2, 5],[5, 1],[3, 0]])
x=numpy.array([5,1])   # the value I want to count (can be iterator, in a list, etc.)
temp = numpy.ascontiguousarray(MyArray).view(numpy.dtype((numpy.void, MyArray.dtype.itemsize * MyArray.shape[1])))  # convert the 2d-array into an array of analyzable patterns
xt=numpy.ascontiguousarray(x).view(numpy.dtype((numpy.void, x.dtype.itemsize * x.shape[0])))  # convert what you search into one analyzable pattern
numpy.sum(temp==xt)  # count of the searched pattern in the list of patterns

使用numpy.unique:

import numpy
a = numpy.array([0, 3, 0, 1, 0, 1, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 3, 4])
unique, counts = numpy.unique(a, return_counts=True)

>>> dict(zip(unique, counts))
{0: 7, 1: 4, 2: 1, 3: 2, 4: 1}

使用collections.Counter的非numpy方法;

import collections, numpy
a = numpy.array([0, 3, 0, 1, 0, 1, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 3, 4])
counter = collections.Counter(a)

>>> counter
Counter({0: 7, 1: 4, 3: 2, 2: 1, 4: 1})

没有人建议使用numpy。Bincount (input, minlength)与minlength = np.size(input)，但这似乎是一个很好的解决方案，而且绝对是最快的:

In [1]: choices = np.random.randint(0, 100, 10000)

In [2]: %timeit [ np.sum(choices == k) for k in range(min(choices), max(choices)+1) ]
100 loops, best of 3: 2.67 ms per loop

In [3]: %timeit np.unique(choices, return_counts=True)
1000 loops, best of 3: 388 µs per loop

In [4]: %timeit np.bincount(choices, minlength=np.size(choices))
100000 loops, best of 3: 16.3 µs per loop

numpy之间的加速太疯狂了。unique(x, return_counts=True)和numpy。Bincount (x, minlength=np.max(x)) !