Get This hack!

在一行汇编代码中，在几页未注释的代码之后。

public GetRandomNumber()
{
    // Chosen by a fairly rolen dice
    return 12;
}

在一个名为“Bar”的类中(这是一个不具有描述性名称的UI控件)，类头文件:

/// <summary>I pity the "foo".</summary>

Remove()方法:

/// <summary>A "foo" and his money are soon parted.</summary>

更糟糕的是，业务合作伙伴从生成的文档中指出了这一点。更糟糕的是，这些可能是我们从那家伙那里得到的最接近有用文件的东西。

我想我有过这样的经历:

if (case1) { // trivial
...
}
else { // we are screwed
 /* fill in later */
}

好吧，我可能用了一个比搞砸更强烈的词

我刚刚在。net的自定义Linq提供程序中找到了这个:

//select is a royal pain in the ass where 
//the parameter passed to CreateQuery isn't actually the one that goes in the call
//requiring this workaround.  Not sure how straight Linq to Objects does it.

还有这个

//expressions have to be compiled in order to work with the method call on 
//straight Enumerable somehow, LINQ to objects itself magically does this.  
//Reflector shows a mess, so I (Aaron) invented my own way.  God love unit tests!

我刚刚也找到了这个…一切都会变得更好

  //ok, this is a hairy, dirty, and nasty piece of code
  //the alternatives are substantially worse than this though
  //i.e. when you do your own provider, LINQ assumes that
  //you are going to implement your own expression tree visitor and
  //do it all yourself.  Frankly, I still have xmas shopping to do
  //and I really don't want us to be foobared when we get
  //even more extension methods added to LINQ
  //therefore, we are pulling execute based on taking the calling the 
  //standard execute on enumerable, but using our own class
  //
  //optimization can occur from here on an as needed basis, that is
  //check for the value of mex.Method.Name, and write a handler for
  //that method
  //
  //also, it may not be a bad idea to rather than do this reflection 
  //each and every time somehow cache the reflected methodinfos and do 
  //lookups that way that said, we need a complete red/green/refactor 
  //cycle here before I am touching that one

还有这个

//Compile that mutherf-ker, invoke it, and get the resulting hash

我只是发表了这样的评论:

// this control (Resistance) is FUTILE!